The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Utas e 2000

Manufactured by LKC Technologies
Sourced in United States

The UTAS E-2000 is a laboratory equipment designed for precise and accurate measurements. It features a high-resolution display, intuitive controls, and advanced data management capabilities. The core function of the UTAS E-2000 is to provide reliable and consistent performance in a variety of laboratory applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using utas e 2000

1

Electroretinography in Dark-Adapted Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were dark-adapted over 16 h. Mice were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of a mixture of tiletamine and zolazepam (1:1, 2.25 mg/kg body weight) and xylazine hydrochloride (0.7 mg/kg body weight). Pupils were dilated with an eye drop containing phenylephrine (0.5%) and tropicamide (0.5%). Contact lens electrodes were placed on both eyes with a drop of methylcellulose. Full-field ERGs were recorded46 (link) by using the universal testing and electrophysiologic system 2000 (UTAS E-2000, LKC Technologies). The responses were recorded at a gain of 2 k using a notch filter at 60 Hz, and were bandpass filtered between 0.1 and 1500 Hz. In the light-adapted photopic state, with a 30 cd/m2 background light to desensitize the rods and isolate cones, photopic cone responses were recorded in response to a single flash of 0 dB. The amplitude of the a-wave was measured from the baseline to the lowest negative-going voltage, whereas peak b-wave amplitudes were measured from the trough of the a-wave to the highest peak of the positive b-wave.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Measurement of Photopic Cone Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mice were dark-adapted over 16 h. Then the mice were anesthetized and their pupils were dilated. Contact lens electrodes were placed on both eyes with a drop of methylcellulose. Full-field electroretinographies (ERGs) were recorded by using the universal testing and electrophysiologic system 2000 (UTAS E-2000, LKC Technologies). The responses were recorded at a gain of 2 k using a notch filter at 60 Hz, and were bandpass filtered between 0.1 and 1500 Hz. In the light-adapted photopic state, with a −1.02 log cds/m2 background light (flash intensity) to desensitize the rods and isolate cones, photopic cone responses were recorded in response to a single flash of 0 dB. The amplitude of the a-wave was measured from the baseline to the lowest negative-going voltage, whereas peak b-wave amplitudes were measured from the trough of the a-wave to the highest peak of the positive b-wave.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Electroretinogram Recording in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were dark-adapted over 16 h. Mice were anaesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of a mixture of tiletamine and zolazepam (1:1, 2.25 mg per kg body weight) and xylazine hydrochloride (0.7 mg per kg body weight). Pupils were dilated with an eye drop containing phenylephrine (0.5%) and tropicamide (0.5%). Contact lens electrodes were placed on both eyes with a drop of methylcellose. Full-field ERGs were recorded as described35 (link) by using the universal testing and electrophysiologic system 2000 (UTAS E-2000, LKC Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). The responses were recorded at a gain of 2 k using a notch filter at 60 Hz, and were bandpass filtered between 0.1 and 1,500 Hz. In the light-adapted state (photopic), with a 30 cd/m2 background light to desensitize the rods and isolate cones, cone responses were recorded in response to single flashed of 0 dB for photopic response, and a flicker sequence of 30 Hz, averaging 20 responses. The amplitude of the a-wave was measured from the baseline to the lowest negative-going voltage, whereas peak b-wave amplitudes were measured from the trough of the a-wave to the highest peak of the positive b-wave.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Electroretinography in Dark-Adapted Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electroretinograms (ERGs) were recorded in response to full-field light flashes essentially as described previously20 (link). In brief, after overnight dark adaptation, rats were anesthetized with intraperitoneal ketamine (75 mg/kg) and xylazine (5 mg/kg) and their pupils were dilated with eye drops (Mydriacyl® (tropicamide ophthalmic solution, 1% USP); phenylephrine hydrochloride (2.5% ophthalmic solution, USP); cyclopentolate hydrocholoride (1% ophthalmic solution, USP)). Needle electrodes placed in the cheek and tail were used as reference and ground leads, respectively. A thin stainless steel wire active electrode contacted the corneal surface (anesthetized with proparacaine hydrochloride (0.5% ophthalmic solution, USP) eye drops) though a layer of 1% methylcellulose. Light-evoked responses were band-pass filtered (0.3–1000 Hz), differentially amplified, averaged and stored using a UTAS E-2000 (LKC Technologies; Gaithersburg MD, USA) signal averaging system. ERGs were recorded in response to strobe flash stimuli presented in darkness (to record rod-driven signals) and then against a steady rod-desensitizing adapting field (to record cone-driven signals).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Electroretinography Assessment of AAV1-Rz-SOD2 Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Visual function was assessed with electroretinography (ERG) performed at pretreatment as baseline, 1 month after AAV1-Rz-SOD2 injection, and 4 months after AAV1-Rz-SOD2 injection as previously described [33 (link)]. For the ERGs, the mice were dark-adapted overnight, and full-field ERGs were recorded with a visual electrodiagnostic system (UTAS-E 2000; LKC Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) using gold wire loop electrodes placed on each cornea and a reference electrode placed subcutaneously between the eyes. Scotopic rod recordings were performed with stimuli presented at intensities of 0.025, 0.25, and 2.5 log cd-s/m2 at 10-, 20-, and 30-s intervals, respectively. Ten responses were recorded and averaged at each light intensity. Photopic cone recordings were performed after the mice were light adapted to a white background light of 100 cds/m2 for 5 min. Recordings were performed with four-increasing flash intensities from 0, 5, 10, and 25 log cd-s/m2 in the presence of a constant 100 mcds/m2 rod suppressing background light. Fifty responses were recorded and averaged at each intensity. The a-waves were measured from the baseline to the peak in the negative direction, and the b-waves were measured from the negative peak to the major positive peak. The ERG data are presented as comparisons between treatment conditions for the mean of the maxima for a- and b-wave responses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Intravitreal BB-Cl-amidine Injection: Evaluating Retinal Function and Structure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice (6-week-old C57BL/6; Koatech) were intravitreally injected with 2 µM BB-Cl-amidine after general anesthesia. Optomotor response measurement (OptoMotry HD; CerebralMechanics) and electroretinography (cat. no. UTAS E-2000; LKC Technologies) were performed 1 week after injection according to previous guidelines (26 (link)). Enucleated eyes were prepared and analyzed using H&E staining and TUNEL assay. Structure and toxicity evaluations were performed according to a previously established protocol (22 (link)). The results of H&E staining were analyzed by measuring the a/b ratio, where ‘a’ is the length from the innermost ganglion cell layer to the outermost inner nuclear layer, while ‘b’ is the length from the innermost ganglion cell layer to the outermost outer nuclear layer. All mice were maintained in a specific-pathogen free facility as previously described, in accordance with the ARVO statement.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Scotopic Electroretinogram Recordings in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The entire procedure was carried out under dim red light. RCS rats were dark-adapted overnight before intraperitoneal injection of 100 mg/kg ketamine and 10 mg/kg xylazine to induce anesthesia. Scotopic responses were recorded exactly as described previously using a UTAS-E2000 visual electrodiagnostic system (LKC Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) (23 (link)). Stimuli were presented in order of increasing intensity as a series of white flashes of 1.5 cd-s/m2 attenuated with neutral density filters. For each flash intensity, three to six recordings were averaged. For all recordings, a-wave amplitudes were measured from the baseline to the trough of the a-wave, and b-wave amplitudes were measured from the trough of the a-wave to the peak of the b-wave.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Electroretinography in Dark-Adapted Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were dark adapted for over 16 hours. After deep anesthesia, pupils were dilated with an eye drop containing phenylephrine hydrochloride (5 mg/ml) and tropicamide (5 mg/ml). Full-field electroretinography was performed using the universal testing and electrophysiologic system 2000 (UTAS E-2000, LKC Technologies). The scotopic responses were recorded with a flash of 0 dB at a gain of 2 k using a notch filter at 60 Hz and were bandpass filtered between 0.1 and 1500 Hz. The amplitudes of the a-wave were measured from the baseline to the lowest negative-going voltage, whereas the peak b-wave amplitudes were estimated from the trough of the a-wave to the highest peak of the positive b-wave.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Scotopic Electroretinography in Dark-Adapted Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals were dark-adapted overnight before recording scotopic responses under anesthesia and under dim red light exactly as described previously using a UTAS-E2000 visual electrodiagnostic system (LKC Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD)26 (link). Stimuli were presented in order of increasing intensity as a series of white flashes of 1.5 cd-s/m2 attenuated to yield intensities from −1.8 to 0.2 log cd-s/m2. For each flash intensity, three to six recordings were averaged. For all recordings, a-wave amplitudes were measured from the baseline to the trough of the a-wave, and b-wave amplitudes were measured from the trough of the a-wave to the peak of the b-wave.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Electroretinogram Assessment of Retinal Function

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electroretinogram (ERG) was measured using an electrodiagnostic LKC system (UTAS-E 2000; LKC Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) to assess the function of the retina. Mice were dark adapted overnight before taking measurements for scotopic a-wave and b-wave responses.10 (link),16 (link) Scotopic rod measurements were recorded following white light flashes of increasing intensities of 0.025, 0.25, and 2.5 log cd·s/m2, at time intervals of 10, 20, and 30 seconds. For measurement of photopic cone responses, mice were light adapted to a white background for 10 minutes, followed by flashes of light stimulation at 0, 5, 10, and 25 log cd·s/m2 intensities. The trace amplitude between time 0 and the lowest point on the trace was considered the a-wave, and the amplitude between the lowest trace and the highest peak following oscillatory potentials was considered the b-wave.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!