The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Tecnai 12 transmission electron microscope

Manufactured by Philips
Sourced in Netherlands, United States, Japan

The Tecnai 12 is a transmission electron microscope manufactured by Philips. It is designed to provide high-resolution imaging of small-scale samples. The Tecnai 12 utilizes an electron beam to illuminate and magnify specimens, enabling the observation of fine structural details at the nanometer scale.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

27 protocols using tecnai 12 transmission electron microscope

1

Exosome Characterization by Electron Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified exosomes were washed by ultracentrifugation (100,000×g, 90 minutes, and 4°C) in 0.2 M hydroxyethyl piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) pH 7.25 solution. All supernatant was removed, and pellet was resuspended in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M HEPES pH 7.25 solution. Five microliters of fixed exosome solutions were absorbed on each glow-discharged carbon-coated nickel grid and allowed to air dry for 5 minutes. Uranyl formate solutions were prepared by dissolving 7.5 μg uranyl formate in 500 μl boiling water and subsequently adding 1.25 μl 10 N NaOH and vigorous shaking. Solutions were then centrifuged at 21,000×g for 5 minutes to remove debris, and supernatants were collected and used. The grids were negatively stained with 5 μl of uranyl formate solution and allowed to air-dry for 15 minutes. Exosomes were imaged using a Philips TECNAI 12 electron transmission microscope. Microscope tension was set to 120 kV, and grid was inserted to the sample holder. After ensuring that vacuum was maintained, the height of the beam was adjusted using the wobbler function. Intensity, focus, and magnification were adjusted accordingly, and AMT camera was used to capture images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Exosome Visualization Protocol by Electron Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified exosomes were washed by ultracentrifugation (100,000 × g, 90 min, 4°C) in 0.2 M hydroxyethyl piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) pH 7.25 solution. All supernatant was removed, and the pellet was resuspended in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M HEPES pH 7.25 solution. 5 µl of fixed exosome solutions were absorbed on each glow‐discharged carbon‐coated nickel grid and allowed to air dry for 5 minutes. Uranyl formate solutions were prepared by dissolving 7.5 µg uranyl formate in 500 µl boiling water and subsequently adding 1.25 µl 10 N NaOH and vigorous shaking. Solutions were then centrifuged at 21,000 × g for 5 minutes to remove debris and supernatants were collected and used. The grids were negatively stained with 5 µl of the prepared uranyl formate solution and allowed to air‐dry for 15 min. Exosomes were imaged using a Philips TECNAI 12 electron transmission microscope. Microscope tension was set to 120 kV and grid was inserted to the sample holder. After ensuring vacuum was maintained, the height of the beam was adjusted using the wobbler function. Intensity, focus, and magnification were adjusted accordingly, and AMT camera was used to capture images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Ultrastructural Analysis of Plant Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Root (8–10 cm from the tip), stem (3 cm from the base) and leaf (third leaf) samples were collected and then cut into small pieces (1–2 mm) and immersed in 2.5 % (v/v) glutaraldehyde and 3 % paraformaldehyde in 0.1 m sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) for 2.5 h. After three 15 min washes with the buffer, the samples were postfixed in 1 % osmium tetroxide, in the same buffer, for 2 h. After this, three washes with phosphate buffer were performed. All fixed tissues were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol (35, 50, 70, 96 and 100 %), then infiltrated, first with a propylene oxide and then with propylene oxide and Spurr’s resin mixture. The samples were then immersed in Spurr’s resin overnight at 4 °C. Finally, the samples were embedded in Spurr resin. Blocks were sectioned on a Leica EM UC6 ultramicrotome, collected on Formvar-coated copper grids and stained with uranyl acetate followed by lead citrate. Sections were examined using a Philips Tecnai 12 transmission electron microscope. For each treatment, an average of six samples from four different tissues was investigated. For each sample, 5–10 ultrathin sections were examined.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiscale scaffold characterization protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three steps were necessary to obtain the multiscale scaffold (Figure 9).
The topography of the electrospun scaffolds was observed using environmental scanning electron microscopy (Philips XL30 ESEM-FEG). Fiber diameter was measured after setting up the scale bar. Average fiber diameters (n = 100 fibers) were analyzed with ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, Maryland). The isotropy value of the scaffold (n = 6) was analyzed using Mountain™ version 8.0 software (with smoothing and maintaining the default frequency thresholds at 5% and 80% Str ISO 25178) and the main orientations of the fibers were analyzed using the Fourier Transformation method (n = 6). Gold deposits over the electrospun scaffold were investigated using Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) analysis with the detector present in the microscope. The measurement is based on the energy and intensity distribution of X-ray signals produced by the electron beam striking the surface of the target scaffold. Samples for transmission electron microscope (TEM) analysis were prepared by dropping a dilute suspension of gold nanoparticles on to copper grids covered by a carbon film. Grids were observed with a Philips Tecnai 12 transmission electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Ultrastructural Examination of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For studying cells ultrastructure, the samples were embedded in Spurr resin as described in Garcia de la Garma et al. (2015 (link)). Briefly, samples were fixed for 2.5 h at 4°C in a 0.1 M Na-phosphate buffered (pH 7.2) mixture of 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 4% paraformaldehyde. Tissue was post-fixed with 2% osmium tetroxide for 2 h. The samples were then dehydrated in a graded alcohol series and propylene oxide and embedded in Spurr's resin. Blocks were sectioned on a Leica EM UC6 ultramicrotome, collected on formvar-coated copper grids and stained with uranyl acetate followed by lead citrate. Ultra-thin sections were examined using a Philips Tecnai 12 transmission electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ultrastructural Analysis of MCAO-Induced Brain Damage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission electron microscopy was performed at 24 hours after MCAO. The cortex was cut into 1-mm3 cubes and fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde/2.5% glutaraldehyde for 24 hours. Samples were then fixed for 2 hours in 1% osmium tetroxide and dehydrated in a graded ethanol series and embedded in Araldite. The samples were cut into 50-nm-thick sections and stained with uranylacetate and lead citrate. The ultrastructure of pyramidal cells, astrocytes and blood-brain barrier (BBB) were observed with a Tecnai 12 transmission electron microscope (Philips, Eindhoven, Netherlands).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Viral Morphology and Purity by TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Viral morphotypes and purity (free of cell contamination) were determined using transmission electron microscopy. Briefly, one drop of the above purified and concentrated viral solution (approximately 1012 VLPs/ml) was loaded on a copper grid and dried at room temperature for 15 min. After excess liquid was drained off, the grid was stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid for 2 min. Excess phosphotungstic acid was removed and air-dried. The grids were then examined under a Philips TECNAI 12 transmission electron microscope at an acceleration voltage of 100 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Mitochondrial Ultrastructure Analysis in Hippocampal Slices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hippocampal slices were used for electron microscopy analysis according to standard procedures. Ultra-thin sections were examined using a Phillips Tecnai 12 transmission electron microscope at 80 kV at the Electron Microscope Facility of the Faculty of Biological Sciences, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. For each treatment, 40 to 50 digital images at 16,500X magnification were obtained, and they were manually analyzed with ImageJ in a blinded fashion by measuring the mitochondrial area [32 ,36 (link)]. Ultrastructural features of the mitochondria, such as the integrity of the membrane and cristae, were determined for each mitochondrion concomitantly with the measurement of morphological parameters [37 (link)]. Membranes or cristae were considered to be intact when the entire structure was preserved and organized and the mitochondria appeared normal, as previously described [38 (link)]. Quantitative analysis was performed with n = 3 using GraphPad Prism 5.01 software. For more details, see S1 File.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

PEDV Detection Using Gold Nanorods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PEDV CV777 strain was stored in our lab. Protein G-conjugated gold nanorods (120 nm in length and 40 nm in width, ~1.0 × 1012 particles/mL) were purchased from Creative Diagnostics. (New York, USA). Mouse anti-PEDV polyclonal antibodies were prepared as described in Section 2.2. BSA was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). PBS was supplied by Biyuntian Co. (Shanghai, China). Tween 20 was received from Aladdin (Los Angeles, CA, USA).
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained using a Tecnai 12 transmission electron microscope (Philips, AMS, The Netherlands). Dark field images were obtained using a Nikon DFM (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). SEM images were obtained using a GeminiSEM 300 (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with an acceleration voltage of 10.0 kV and 5 k of magnification. The zeta potential was measured using a Malvern Instrument (Zetasizer NanoES90, Worcs, UK). All fluorescence quantitative data were measured by a LightCycler480 II fluorescence quantitative PCR (qPCR) instrument (Roche, Basel, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Transmission Electron Microscopy of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TEM was performed using a Philips Tecnai 12 Transmission Electron Microscope (Philips/FEI, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) at the electronic imaging department of the Imachem imaging platform (France BioImaging) at the Institut de Biologie de l’Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris. The Gatan DigitalMicrograph software was used to acquire TEM images at various magnifications with a 4K CCD Orius 1000 camera (Gatan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!