The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using bu1 75 icr1

1

Comprehensive Immunohistochemistry Panel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following primary antibodies were used: anti–E-cadherin (1:100, cat. Asp155-Ile707; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), anti-BrdU (1:100, cat. BU1/75 [ICR1]; NOVUS Biologicals, Centennial, CO), anti–ZO-1 (1:100, cat. 61-7300; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), anti–claudin-1 (1:200, cat. ab15098; Abcam, Waltham, MA), anti–claudin-2 (1:200, cat. ab53032; Abcam), and anti–occludin-1 (1:50, cat. 40-4700; Thermo Fisher Scientific). The following secondary antibodies were used: anti-goat (1:500, A11058; Life Technology, Carlsbad, CA), anti-rat (1:500, cat. ab150160; Abcam), and anti-rabbit (1:500, cat. A-11037; Thermo Fisher Scientific). 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (cat. 0100-20; Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL) was used for counterstaining for immunofluorescence and FISH. Fluorophore-conjugated antibodies against CD4 (GK1.5, RM4-5), CD45 (30-F11), CD90.2 (53-2.1), CD127 (A7R34), IFN-gamma (XMG1.2), IL17A (TC11-18H10.1), and corresponding isotype controls were from BioLegend (San Diego, CA), and antibodies against FoxP3 (FJK-16s), IL22 (1H8PWSR), RORγt (B2D), Natural Killer Cell P46-Related Protein (29A1.4), hematopoietic lineage cocktail (88-7772-72), IL10 (JES5-16E3), and corresponding isotype controls were from Thermo Fisher Scientific.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

DNA Damage Response Pathway Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following reagents were used: Doxycycline (Sigma-Aldrich, D9891), MRE11 inhibitor [5-(4-hydroxybenzylidene)-2-iminothiazolidin-4-one, (Sigma-Aldrich, M9948)], IdU (Sigma-Aldrich, I7125), CldU (Sigma-Aldrich, C6891) and Histone deacetylase inhibitor, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (Tocris Biosciences, 4652). Mouse monoclonal anti-γH2AX (JBW301; EMD Millipore, 07-164), rabbit polyclonal anti-RAD51 (H-92; Santa Cruz, sc-8349), rabbit polyclonal anti-STING (Novus Biologicals, 2-24683), anti-phospho-STING (Ser366; Cell Signaling, 85735), rabbit monoclonal anti-phospho-TBK1 (Ser172; D52C2; Cell Signaling, 5483), rabbit polyclonal anti-phospho-STAT3 (Tyr705; Cell Signaling, 9131), rabbit monoclonal anti-CASPASE-3 (8G10; Cell Signaling, 9665), mouse monoclonal anti-PARP1 (F2; Santa Cruz, 8007), mouse monoclonal anti-γ-Tubulin (GTU-88; Sigma-Aldrich, T6557), mouse monoclonal anti-BrdU (B44; BD Biosciences, 347580) and rat monoclonal anti-BrdU (BU1/75-ICR1; Novus Biologicals, NB500-169) antibodies. Fluorescent conjugated secondary antibodies Alexa488, Alexa555, Alexa633, were purchased from Molecular Probes (Invitrogen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

DNA Fiber Analysis of Replication Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were pulse-labeled with 25 μM CldU (Sigma-Aldrich, C6891mg) and 250 μM IdU (Sigma-Aldrich, I7125-5g) at indicated times, with or without treatment, as reported in the experimental schemes. DNA fibers were prepared as previously reported (27 (link)). For the immunodetection of labeled tracks, the following primary antibodies were used: anti-CldU [rat monoclonal anti–5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU)/CldU; BU1/75 ICR1, Novus, 1:100] and anti-IdU (mouse monoclonal anti-BrdU/IdU; clone B44, Becton Dickinson, 1:50). The secondary antibodies were goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 594 (Abcam, ab150116, 1:200) or goat anti-rat Alexa Fluor 488 (Abcam, ab150157, 1:200). The incubation with antibodies was accomplished in a humidified chamber for 1 hour at room temperature. Images were acquired randomly from fields with untangled fibers using a Nikon Eclipse 80i fluorescence microscope, equipped with a video confocal system. The length of labeled tracks was measured using Fiji software, and values were converted into kilobases using the conversion factor of 1 μm = 2.59 kb. A minimum of 100 individual fibers was analyzed for each experiment, and the mean of at least three independent experiments is presented. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism Software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!