The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Confirm mouse anti er antibody clone 6f11

Manufactured by Roche

The CONFIRM™ mouse anti-ER antibody (clone 6F11) is a laboratory reagent designed for the detection of estrogen receptor (ER) in various research applications. The antibody is intended for use in immunohistochemical (IHC) and other immunoassay procedures.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 protocols using confirm mouse anti er antibody clone 6f11

1

Evaluating RAB6C Expression in Breast Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data on ER, PR and HER2 was available from previous studies. The status of ER and PR was assessed retrospectively with immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the VENTANA® automated slide stainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.). The primary monoclonal antibodies used were CONFIRM™ mouse anti-ER antibody (clone 6F11) and CONFIRM™ mouse anti-PR antibody (clone 16) (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.). The cut-off level was set to 10% positively stained tumor cells (9 (link)). HER2 was analyzed with IHC as previously described (10 (link)). The Nottingham Histological Grade (NHG) was analyzed retrospectively by the same investigator for all tumor samples.
The protein expression of RAB6C was analyzed with IHC, and the staining pattern was evaluated independently by two investigators (JS and TB). The polyclonal rabbit antibody ab200396 (Abcam) was used. The intensity of RAB6C in the nucleus was analyzed and scored as 0, 1, 2 or 3. If the nuclei had an intensity ≥2, the tumor was considered to have high expression of RAB6C (RAB6C+). Otherwise, it was considered to have low RAB6C expression (RAB6C-).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Hormone Receptor Determination Methods in Breast Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before 1988, ER and PgR were determined using isoelectric focusing on polyacrylamide gel as previously described [5 (link)]. After 1988, an enzyme immunoassay was used. For ER, studies have shown that results with these techniques correlate well with those obtained using methods based on dextran-coated charcoal and IHC [2 (link)]. The cytosol receptor values were normalized to DNA content, and a receptor content of ≥0.05 fmol/µg DNA was classified as positive. The IHC staining was performed using the Ventana HX automatic system BenchMark (Ventana Medical System, SA IllKirch, Cedex, France). Primary monoclonal antibodies were the CONFIRM™ mouse anti-ER antibody (clone 6F11) and the CONFIRM™ mouse anti-PR antibody (clone 16) from Ventana Medical Systems. Antigen retrieval and staining procedure were performed according to the instruction by the Ventana manufacture. Positive controls were run with each batch. Only the invasive part of the carcinoma was assessed, and for each case, all three cores of the TMA were reviewed. The receptor levels presented are based on an average of the three cores of the TMA. The proportion of stained nuclei was recorded as 0, 1–9 %, 10–24 %, 25–49 %, 50–74 %, 75–89 %, and ≥90 %. The scoring was done by two pathologists (B.L; L.S.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Biomarker Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ER and PR were detected by immunohistochemistry using CONFIRM™ mouse anti-ER antibody (clone 6F11) and CONFIRM™ mouse anti-PR antibody (clone 16) from Ventana Medical Systems. The staining was performed according to the manufacturer instructions using the Ventana® automated slide stainer (Ventana Medical Systems, S.A., Illkirch, France). HER2 was detected with the DAKO AO0485 polyclonal rabbit antibody also according to the guidelines provided by the manufacturer [35 (link)].
Ki67 was stained with the monoclonal mouse anti-human Ki67 clone MIB-1 (DAKO M7240) using the DAKO Link48 Auto Stainer protocol [36 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!