The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cup horn sonicator

Manufactured by Qsonica
Sourced in United States

The Cup Horn Sonicator is a laboratory equipment designed for sample processing and extraction. It utilizes ultrasonic waves to disrupt cells, disperse particles, and homogenize samples. The device features a cup-shaped sample holder that allows for efficient energy transfer and uniform sonication of the sample.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

19 protocols using cup horn sonicator

1

Preparation of Endotoxin-Free MWCNT Suspensions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Uncoated MWCNTs (U-MWCNT) and aluminum oxide coated (A-MWCNT) were weighed using a milligram scale (Mettler, Toledo, OH) suspended in a sterile, 0.1% pluronic F-68 (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in phosphate buffer solution to achieve the final concentration of 10 mg/mL. Vials containing the suspended nanomaterials were dispersed using a cuphorn sonicator (Qsonica, Newton CT) at room temperature for 1 min prior to dosing. A limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) chromogenic assay (Lonza Inc., Walkersville, MD) was used to test the nanomaterials for endotoxin contamination. All MWCNTs, both U-MWCNT and A-MWCNT, tested negative (<0.3 EU/mL) for endotoxin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Nickel Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NiNPs were purchased from Sun Innovations (Fremont, CA) and were characterized by the manufacturer as a sphere-shaped nanoparticle with a diameter of ~20 nm, metal purity of 99.9% and surface area of 40 to 60 m2/g. Moreover, these NiNPs have been previously described as insoluble in water and possess an oxidation state of zero (Glista-Baker et al., 2014 (link)). A more detailed independent characterization of NiNP size carried out in our laboratory using TEM showed an average mean (±SEM) particle diameter of 25.43 ±11.62 nm with agglomerates ranging from 250 – 600 nm when suspended in 0.1% pluronic F-68 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) diluted in Gibco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) (Glista-Baker et al., 2012 (link)). For pulmonary exposure of mice, NiNPs suspended in 0.1% pluronic/DPBS were sonicated in a cuphorn sonicator (Qsonica, Newton, CT) for 2 minutes and vortexed immediately before dosing as described below. A representative TEM image of the NiNPs is shown in Fig. 1A.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Profiling Histone Modifications by ChIP-qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatin immunoprecipitation-quantitative PCR (ChIP-qPCR) was performed using established protocols, with modifications. Cells were fixed with 1% formaldehyde, lysed, and sonicated (Qsonica cup horn sonicator, 100% amplitude). DNA fragments were in the 200–700 bp range. The following antibodies were then added to the pre-cleared sample and incubated overnight at 4°C: Anti-Trimethyl Histone H3Lys27 (Millipore 07-449, 2g) and Anti-Ubiquityl-Histone H2ALys119 D27C4 XP (Cell Signaling Technology #8240, 10l). The complexes were purified using protein-G dynabeads (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA) followed by elution and crosslink reversal. DNA was recovered using QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Valenica, CA, USA). Target sequences were amplified by PCR using iTaq SYBR green (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Primer sequences for the KCNA5 promoter were KCNA5 #1 (Forward: 5’-TCCAGCATCATCAGTTTCCA -3’ and Reverse: 5’-TGGCTCTCATTATGCACCAG-3’) and KCNA5 #2 (Forward: 5’-GCTGAAGGTTGCATCTGCT-3’ and Reverse: 5’- GGCCCTGACGTCAAGAAG-3’). Data were analyzed using the percent input method where Percent input = 100*2^(Average Ct Input – Average Ct IP).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Nanomaterial Suspension Preparation and Endotoxin Testing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Uncoated & coated MWCNTs, carbon black nanoparticles, and aluminum oxide nanoparticles were weighed using a milligram scale (Mettler, Toledo OH) suspended in a sterile, 0.1% pluronic F-68 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis MO) in phosphate buffer solution to achieve the final concentration of 10 mg/ml. Vials containing the suspended nanomaterials were either used as is (unsonicated) or dispersed using a cuphorn sonicator (Qsonica, Newton CT) at room temperature for 1 minute prior to dosing. A limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) chromogenic assay (Lonza Inc., Walkersville MD) was used to test the nanomaterials for endotoxin contamination as we have previously validated [15] (link) All MWCNTs, both uncoated and ALD-coated, as well as Al2O3 and CB nanoparticles, tested negative (<0.3 EU/ml) for endotoxin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genomic DNA Fragmentation and Library Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A. spirocauda genomic DNA was pulse-sonicated using a cup-horn sonicator (QSonica, Newton, CT) for 2.5 min to generate fragmented DNA. Fragmentation was confirmed using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. The resulting fragment sizes ranged between 200 and 1500 base pairs. Fragmented total genomic DNA was then prepared for sequencing using the NEBNext Ultra® II kit (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA) following the manufacturer's instructions. Total input DNA for library construction was 28 ng. Library quality was validated using the Agilent Bioanlyzer High Sensitivity DNA kit (#5076-4626, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) and was sequenced using MiSeq v2 500 cycle reagents (MS-102-2003, Illumina, San Diego, CA) and a 1% PhiX control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

ChIP-chip Profiling of Histone Marks

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ChIP-chip assay and initial bioinformatic analysis were performed essentially as described earlier [35 (link)]. Early passage DF, DP, PDL, AB, and CEM progenitors were used for the assay. Nuclei from formaldehyde-treated cells were lysed in cold lysis buffer and chromatin sonicated to a size of 300bp-1kb in a cup horn sonicator (Q Sonica, Newtown CT). Equal amounts of sheared chromatin were incubated overnight with 100 µL of DynaI beads (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) pre-bound to 10 µg of antibodies against H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 histone modifications (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA). An input fraction corresponding to 10% of the starting chromatin was kept aside for background normalization. The immunoprecipitated chromatin was washed five times with RIPA buffer and once with 1XTE, and the bound protein-DNA complexes were eluted by incubating with elution buffer at 65 °C, followed by crosslink reversal overnight at 65 °C. The DNA was purified by Proteinase K digestion, phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. The resulting pellet was resuspended in 50 µL of 10 mM Tris pH8.0. The ChIP experiments were performed as triplicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Sensitive Fibril Growth Assay for Parkinson's Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We developed a sensitive assay that uses the fluorescein arsenical dye FlAsH-EDT2 (Invitrogen TC-FlAsH in-cell tetracysteine tag detection kit, catalog no. T34561) to measure fibril growth rates in the presence of C2-WT and mutant C2-Asyn monomer. The SPARK assay was similar to FlAsH seed growth experiments demonstrated in our previous publication39 (link). Amplified fibril samples at 1.5 μM concentration in fibril buffer plus 0.1% Triton X-100 were sonicated for 5 min at amplitude 50 in the cup horn sonicator (Qsonica) and then mixed with 0.5 mg/ml of C2-Asyn monomer (C2-WT-Asyn and mutant C2-Asyn) in a total volume of 25 μl. The seeds plus monomer mixture were quiescently incubated for 3 h at 37 °C in Corning Black 96-well plates (Fisher, catalog no. 07-200-762). After 3 h, FlAsH assay mixture consisting of 3.5 mm tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine, 1 mm EDT, 1 mm EDTA, 25 nm FlAsH-EDT2, and 200 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0 was added and the mixture incubated for additional 1 h at room temperature. FlAsH fluorescence was detected in a BioTek plate reader using a 485/20-nm excitation filter, a 528/20-nm emission filter, top 510-nm optical setting, and gain setting 100. Data was normalized to fibril growth rates with WT-C2-Asyn monomer. We selected 6th cycle LBD and MSA amplified fibrils (case LBD1, LBD2, LBD3, LBD4, MSA1, MSA2, MSA3 and MSA4) for SPARK assays.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Reconstitution and Characterization of Fluc

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reconstitution of Fluc was carried out as described previously (14 (link)). Briefly, 25 mg/mL chloroform stocks of EPLs (Avanti Polar Lipids Inc. #100600C) were dried by evaporation under a stream of nitrogen gas until a thin dried film of lipids appeared. The film was washed with pentane (Sigma-Aldrich #236705-1L). Then, lipids were resolubilized in the required dialysis buffer with 35 mM CHAPS (Anatrace #C316S) for a final concentration of 20 mg/mL lipids. The lipid-detergent mixture was solubilized using a cup-horn sonicator (Qsonica, Newtown, CT) until the sample was transparent. Protein was added to the solubilized lipid-detergent mixture and placed into 3,500 MWCO dialysis cassettes (Thermo Scientific #66330), and then the samples were then dialyzed in the dark at room temperature in 1,000× sample volume with 4 buffer changes every 4 to 12 h. At the end of dialysis, the samples were freeze-thawed to form large paucilamellar vesicles. This involved 3 repetitions of freezing the samples at –80 °C and thawed in a room-temperature water bath. Samples were stored at room temperature, in the dark for the desired amount of time or frozen at –80 °C until used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Purification and Aggregation of α-Synuclein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human monomeric α-Syn (monomer) was purified using size-exclusion chromatography followed by anion exchange. The Pierce high-capacity endotoxin kit was used to remove endotoxins to < 0.1 EU/μg. α-Syn PFFs were generated as described (37 (link)). Monomer concentration was measured using A280 and the extinction coefficient of 5960 M−1cm−1. Monomer was diluted to 5 mg/ml in 150 mM KCl and 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer and shaken for seven days to generate PFFs. After seven days, PFF protein concentration was determined and previously noted buffer was used to bring concentration to 5 mg/ml. On the day of stereotaxic injections, PFFs were sonicated using a cup horn sonicator (QSonica) with a 15°C water bath. Dynamic light scattering (Wyatt Technology) confirmed < 50 nm fragmentation of PFFs. Immediately before injection, 5 mg/ml of monomer was spun at 20,000 × g, and only the supernatant was injected to prevent aggregate formation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cryo-EM Sample Preparation for Lipid Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the bulk of the sample have been transferred out for SAXS, 20 μL deionized water is added to the remaining residue lipids (diluted to an estimated 20 mM), and sonicated for 6 min (cycles of 5 s on, 5 s off, total time 12 min) in a cup horn sonicator (Qsonica L.L.C., Newton, CT) at 25% power for Cryo-EM. One sample (91 : 6: 3 GMO/DOTAP/DOPE-PEG) was subjected to five additional freeze-thaw-vortex cycles instead of sonication.3μL was applied onto a glow discharged (Fishione plasma cleaner, 25–40 s) 200 mesh lacey carbon-coated copper grid (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) at 90–100% humidity at 22 °C or 4 °C. Grids were blotted for 1–2 s and plunge frozen in liquid ethane using Vitrobot Mark II (FEI, Hillsboro, OR), and kept in liquid nitrogen until imaged. For imaging, the grids were transferred into a single tilt cryo holder (Gatan) for imaging on a 200 kV transmission electron microscope (JEOL 2100 cryoTEM) housed at the Frederick Seitz Materials Research Laboratory (Urbana-Champaign, IL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!