The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cyberknife robotic radiosurgery system

Manufactured by Accuray
Sourced in United States

The CyberKnife robotic radiosurgery system is a non-invasive medical device designed for the treatment of tumors and other medical conditions. It uses a robotic arm to deliver precisely targeted radiation beams to the affected area, while minimizing exposure to surrounding healthy tissue.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using cyberknife robotic radiosurgery system

1

Liver SBRT Fiducial Tracking with CyberKnife

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intrafraction kV images have been assessed for 12 patients (58 ± 12 years old, 6 males/6 females, typically 3 to 6 fractions) undergone liver SBRT with CyberKnife robotic radiosurgery system (Accuray, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) between 2015 and 2018. Before the treatment, three (8 patients) to four (4 patients) fiducials (golden seeds, ~0.7-1.2 mm diameter by ~3.0-6.0 mm length) are implanted inside or adjacent to the tumor in accordance with clinical requirements and fiducial tracking rules. Fiducial placement for soft tissues was expressed as follows:
Before the planning CT scan was executed, those implantation regulations were completed about one week in order to offer an adequate time interval for fiducial stabilization. CK Synchrony fiducial tracking method was used during the whole treatment without respiration restrained. As was shown in Figure 1A, the Two orthogonal X-ray sources equipped on the ceiling and two amorphous silicon panel detectors equipped on the floor are the main components of CK image guidance system. 495 pairs of orthogonal KV images of all patients were acquired during the first fraction. All data of patients were collected under the condition with all patients consent and Research Ethics Board (REB) approved local clinical trial.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cyberknife SBRT Protocols at EMC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The procedures and dose fractionation schedules of SBRT used at EMC have been previously reported in the literature [25 (link),26 (link),27 (link),28 (link)]. Patients were treated with a Cyberknife Robotic Radiosurgery System (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Dose prescriptions and fractionation schedules ranged from 45 to 60 Gy and from 5 to 7 fractions.
Dose calculations were performed using the Monte-Carlobased algorithm. Ray Tracing dose distributions were recalculated with the Monte-Carlo algorithm [29 (link)]. PTV was defined as gross tumor volume (GTV) plus 5 mm. Dose to PTV was prescribed to the 60–87% isodose line covering at least 95% of the PTV. We prioritized the Organ at Risk (OAR) dose constraints over PTV coverage. The patients underwent fiducial-tracking SBRT. If the placement of markers was not possible due to comorbidity or tumor location, we defined an internal-target-volume (ITV).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Robotic SBRT for Metastatic Gynecologic Cancers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Georgetown University Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved this single institution retrospective review. Consecutive patients treated per an institutional protocol who had single extracranial metastases and a controlled ovarian or uterine primary tumor were eligible for this study. Biopsy confirmation of the metastatic site and concordance with the patient’s original pathologic diagnosis were required for study inclusion. Vaginal cuff failures, multiple sites of metastases and re-irradiation were considered exclusion criteria. A single metastasis was defined as the only gross disease present following the last course of therapy. Extent and frequency of prior cytoreductive procedures or systemic agents were not exclusion criteria. Baseline PET/CT with IV contrast was performed for each patient when feasible. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of two or less was required for inclusion. Patients were stratified based on tumor volume (small tumors < 50 cc or large tumors ≥ 50 cc) and dose (low dose < 35 Gy or high dose ≥ 35 Gy). The decision to proceed with SBRT in lieu of surgery was reached in consultation with the gynecologic oncologist (WB). All patients included in this analysis were treated with robotic SBRT in five fractions using the CyberKnife Robotic Radiosurgery System (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

SBRT for Prostate Cancer with Fiducial Tracking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For treatment planning purposes, four gold fiducial markers were inserted into the prostate gland. One week later, a computed tomography (CT) scan was performed (slice thickness, 2 mm) followed by T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The CT and MRI images were then fused for treatment planning. The clinical target volume (CTV) was defined by the prostate capsule and the proximal seminal vesicles. The planning target volume (PTV) was created by expanding the CTV margins by 3 mm posteriorly and 5 mm in all other directions. The following structures were contoured as organs at risk (OAR): rectum, bladder, penile bulb, and both femurs. The prostatic urethra was not included as an OAR because the prescription isodose line was limited to ≥75% to restrict the maximum dose to 125% of the prescription dose. SBRT was delivered to patients using the CyberKnife robotic radiosurgery system (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Fiducial-based tracking was used to account for inter- and intra-fraction prostate motion.
A total dose of 35 or 36.25 Gy to the PTV was delivered in five fractions of 7.0 or 7.25 Gy. Before simulation (planning CT and MRI) and prior to each SBRT fraction, patients were instructed to drink approximately 500 mL of water 20–30 min before the session to fill their bladder to a comfortable level. They were also instructed to present with an empty rectum.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cyberknife-Guided HFSRT for Tumor Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HFSRT was performed using the CyberKnife Robotic Radiosurgery System (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). All patients were immobilized using a relocatable thermoplastic mask. The gross tumor volume (GTV) and the organs at risk were contoured on fused non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images with a 1.0-mm slice thickness. The planning target volume (PTV) was defined as the GTV expanded by 1.0 mm. Treatment planning was performed using the MultiPlan 4.6.0 treatment planning software (Accuracy Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Radiation doses were calculated using the ray-tracing algorithm. HFSRT consisted of a 6.0 MV radiation beam with one or two circular collimator cones. Total radiation doses (18–30 Gy) were delivered in 3 or 5 equal fractions. The radiation dose delivered to the PTV was prescribed to the 70–80% isodose line, covering ≥95% of the PTV. However, due to the constraints of the organs at risk, an underdosage of the PTV was permitted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Frameless Skull Base Radiosurgery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients were treated using the CyberKnife® Robotic Radiosurgery System (Accuray, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) with frameless skull base real time image-guided tracking. Pretreatment 1.25 mm thin-slice, high-resolution computer tomographic scans and matching gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans (MPRAGE sequence) were acquired and fused for treatment planning. Treatment plans were generated using an inverse planning method by the Accuray MultiPlan treatment software. An example of a treatment plan from patient #2 is shown in Fig. 1. Doses were prescribed to the isodose surface that encompassed the margin of the tumor. Patients received 4 mg of dexamethasone immediately after each treatment. For multisession treatments, the typical time interval between fractions was 24 h. The quality of treatment plans was assessed by evaluating target coverage, dose heterogeneity, and conformity. Digitally reconstructed radiograms were computationally synthesized to allow near real-time patient tracking throughout radiosurgery. Treatment safety and efficacy were determined by: 1) Quantifying changes in tumor volume on subsequent MRI scans at the end of each patient’s follow-up period, and 2) Assessment of preservation of optic and olfactory nerve functions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This retrospective study includes 20 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (11 women, 9 men) who were treated between December 2011 and August 2012. We used the CyberKnife® Robotic Radiosurgery System and Synchrony respiratory tracking system (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA). Plans were designed to cover 95% of PTV (CTV based on CT/MRI registration during relaxed exhale + 3-mm safety margin) with the prescribed dose. A total of 20 tumors were treated with three fractions of 10 Gy every other day. In total, 60 fractions were analyzed. Four gold markers (fiducials) were implanted percutaneously under the CT control (each fiducial within 30 mm from tumor center and fiducial constellation centroid within 10 mm of the tumor center). It is assumed that motion of the fiducial’s center of mass (COM) closely approximates to the motion of the tumor’s COM. Constrains for OARs were set: 10 ml < 21Gy, 5 ml < 15Gy, 700 ml < 17Gy and 0,25 ml < 18Gy for stomach, duodenum, liver and spinal cord respectively. Patients were asked to breathe normally during the irradiation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!