The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ts5136mm

Manufactured by TESCAN
Sourced in Czechia

The TS5136MM is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) designed for high-resolution imaging and analysis of a wide range of materials. It features a high-performance electron optical column and advanced detectors, enabling detailed examination of samples at the micro- and nano-scale.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using ts5136mm

1

Comprehensive Characterization of Artificial Rhino Horn

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation was performed with a TESCAN TS5136 MM at 20 kV of accelerating voltage to image both surface and cross-section after Au-coating for 30 s. Samples were cut by IsoMet slow saw with diamond wafer blade to create smooth surface. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) was performed at 10 K min−1 on DTG-60H under air gas with flow rate of 40 cm3 min−1 at a heating rate of 10 °C per minute from 50 °C to 800 °C. Dynamic Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) was performed on small slivers of real rhino horn (legally acquired) and our artificial rhino horn on a TA Q2000 instrument, with a heating rate of 5 °C per minute from −50 °C to 250 °C. For Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy the samples were powdered and mixed with KBr, then processed into pellets. The FTIR spectra were obtained with a Nicolet 6700 spectrometer (Thermofisher, the USA) in the range of 650–4000 cm−1 with a resolution of 2 cm−1 for 128 scans. Mechanical Properties were measured using Dynamic Mechanical Thermal Analysis (DMTA) performed on a TA Q800 under DMA multi-frequency strain mode. The constant parameters for all the DMTA tests are as follows: (i) in the frequency sweep, samples were tested from 100 Hz to 0.1 Hz, (ii) in the strain sweep, we applied the force with the frequency of 1 Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cell Morphology Characterization in Porous Scaffold

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pore morphology in the porous scaffold and cells on the pore walls were observed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM). After 7 days of culture, the cell-seeded scaffolds were analyzed under SEM (TS5136MM; TESCAN, Brno, Czech) and fluorescence microscopy (Olympus BX51, Tokyo, Japan). Before observations, we fixed the cells in the scaffolds in 2.5% glutaraldehyde at 4 °C for 24 h. Thereafter, the samples were sequentially dehydrated, critical point–dried, and sputter-coated with gold. The pretreated samples were then observed by SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM was used to examine the morphology of the ZnO-NPs (SEM, Vega Tescan TS5136MM). Using KBr pellets, the FTIR spectra were recorded with a Nicolet 6700 FTIR spectrometric analyzer. Furthermore, the BET technique was used to compute the specific surface area in the relative pressure range of 0.05–0.3. The Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method was used to compute the mesopore size and distribution from the desorption curves, whereas the t-plot approach was used to calculate the micropore area values. The porosity (using the DFT approach) and surface area were measured using a N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm analysis (Tristar 3000 apparatus, Micrometrics Instrument Corp., Norcross, GA, USA) (BET method). A UV-vis spectrophotometer was used to obtain the spectrophotometric readings (UV 4000, MRI, Stuttgart, Germany).
An XRD (D/Max 2550PC, Rigaku, Japan) diffractometer was used for X-ray diffractometry. The reflection-scanning mode was used to record the radical scan while changing 2 θ from 0° to 100°. A pH meter was used to determine the pH of the solution (Metrohm Herisau Digital E 532, Herisau, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Micromorphological Characterization of PET Sheets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For micromorphological observation, non-coated (PET) and coated (HPC/PET) PET sheets were washed twice with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and then immersed in PBS containing 1% glutaraldehyde solution. After 12 h, the sheets were dehydrated in a series of ethanol solutions, i.e. 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100%, followed by 24 h of air-drying. The PET and HPC/PET sheets were gold sputtered under vacuum and subjected to examination by SEM (TS5136MM; Tescan, Brno, Czech Republic).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Titanium-based Biomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All three samples, i.e., Ti, Ti + SF, and Ti + SF + HAP, were observed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Tescan TS5136MM, Brno, Czechia) at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV after gold spouting to examine the surface morphology. The crystallization patterns of the three samples were recorded using a wide-angle X-ray diffraction (XRD) instrument (D8 Advance, Bruker AXS, Germany) with CuKα radiation (λ = 0.154 nm). The XRD data were collected from 2θ = 5° to 70° at a scanning rate of 2°/min. Attenuated total reflection–Fourier transform infrared (ATR–FTIR) measurements were performed using a Nicolet Nexus 6,700 spectrometer (Saxena et al., 2017 (link)). Each spectrum was recorded with 64 scans and a resolution of 4.0 cm–1. The spectra of Ti + SF and Ti + SF + HAP were analyzed in the range of 650–4,000 cm–1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Lysostaphin-Loaded Cement Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lysostaphin-loaded cement samples “a” to “d” were freeze-dried and sputter-coated with gold. SEM was used to observe the fracture surface of the samples. When observed, samples were mounted to a standard holder using double-faced tape. All the samples were examined by SEM (TS 5136MM, TESCAN, Czech Republic).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!