To analyze the accuracy of amplitude indices in predicting a good FNF, receiver operating characteristics curves (ROC) were plotted and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated, using the Hanley and McNeil method. The best cut-off was defined as the value at which the Youden index, i.e., the difference between sensitivity and 1-specificity, had its maximum value. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses. Statistical analysis was performed using StaView ver 5.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and MedCalc ver 20.015 (MedCalc Software Ltd., Ostend, Belgium).
Ver 20
MedCalc ver 20.015 is a software application designed for medical and scientific calculations. It provides a range of mathematical and statistical tools to assist healthcare professionals and researchers in data analysis and decision-making processes.
10 protocols using ver 20
Accuracy of Amplitude Indices in Predicting FNF
To analyze the accuracy of amplitude indices in predicting a good FNF, receiver operating characteristics curves (ROC) were plotted and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated, using the Hanley and McNeil method. The best cut-off was defined as the value at which the Youden index, i.e., the difference between sensitivity and 1-specificity, had its maximum value. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses. Statistical analysis was performed using StaView ver 5.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and MedCalc ver 20.015 (MedCalc Software Ltd., Ostend, Belgium).
Evaluating GFR Estimation Equations
The study was approved by our ethics committee (approval no. 2018–43-K32), and all procedures adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent.
Perioperative VEP Variation and Visual Outcomes
Predicting Malignant IPNB-L Using SUVmax
Predicting HCC Recurrence After Transplant
Survival Analysis of Oncology Patients
Evaluating Thrombocytopenia in COVID-19
Comprehensive Analysis of Spine Deformity
Minimum Sample Size Determination
where Nmin, minimum sample size; NPNP, population from which the sample is selected n = 2,131, α—level of confidence for the results = 95%, f—fraction size = 0.5 e—maximum error assumed 5% = 0.05 (Zalewska and Niemiro, 2022 (link)).
The statistical analysis of the material was conducted using MedCalc ver.20.104 package. Distributions of the variables were determined by means of Shapiro–Wilk test. The results were presented as average and standard deviation completed with the median. The analysis of differences was performed using nonparametric tests (Mann–Whitney U-test). To analyze the qualitative variables, Chi-squared test was used. Relationships between the variables were investigated using Spearman’s rank correlation tests.
Premature Mortality Risk Assessment
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!