The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ver 20

Manufactured by MedCalc
Sourced in United States, Belgium

MedCalc ver 20.015 is a software application designed for medical and scientific calculations. It provides a range of mathematical and statistical tools to assist healthcare professionals and researchers in data analysis and decision-making processes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using ver 20

1

Accuracy of Amplitude Indices in Predicting FNF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive analysis was performed using mean (±SD) or median (range), and absolute and relative frequencies for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Chi-square test (using Fisher exact test when appropriate) was used for comparison of categorical variables, and Mann-Whitney U test for comparison of continuous variables between groups.
To analyze the accuracy of amplitude indices in predicting a good FNF, receiver operating characteristics curves (ROC) were plotted and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated, using the Hanley and McNeil method. The best cut-off was defined as the value at which the Youden index, i.e., the difference between sensitivity and 1-specificity, had its maximum value. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses. Statistical analysis was performed using StaView ver 5.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and MedCalc ver 20.015 (MedCalc Software Ltd., Ostend, Belgium).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating GFR Estimation Equations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS ver. 20.0 and MedCalc ver. 20.0.15 were used to perform the statistical analysis. Baseline characteristics are presented as medians (interquartile range) for continuous variables and as numbers or percentages for categorical variables. The performance of each equation in terms of assessing the GFR was evaluated by calculating the bias, precision, and accuracy. Bias was defined as the median difference (MD) between the mGFR and eGFR. Precision was defined as the interquartile range of bias. Accuracy was defined as the proportion of eGFR values within 30% of the mGFR (P30). The KDIGO guidelines state that the P30 should be > 90% [16 (link)]. We generated Bland–Altman plots to examine the consistency (precision and mean bias) of the mGFR and eGFR data. The significance level was set to P < 0.05. We analyzed the overall cohort and two subgroups (mGFR < 60 and mGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2).
The study was approved by our ethics committee (approval no. 2018–43-K32), and all procedures adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Perioperative VEP Variation and Visual Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We analyzed separately visual acuity, visual field, and iVEPs of each eye (n = 128). Continuous values were described using mean ± standard deviation (SD), categorical variables using absolute and relative frequencies. Correlation between continuous variables was performed by plotting regression lines and calculating the Spearman correlation coefficient. Comparison of continuous variables between groups was performed using the Mann–Whitney U test, and comparison of categorical variables was performed using the chi-square statistics adopting the Fisher exact test when appropriate. To assess the reliability of perioperative VEP variation in predicting visual change, we plotted ROC curves, calculated the area under the curve (AUC) and assessed the best cutoff. The latter was defined as the threshold value at which the Youden index (i.e., the difference between sensitivity and 1-specificity), has its maximum value. Analyses were performed using StatView ver 5.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and MedCalc ver 20.015 (MedCalc Software Ltd, Osted, Belgium).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Predicting Malignant IPNB-L Using SUVmax

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Continuous variables were expressed as a mean and standard deviation or median value with ranges, and analyzed with the Student t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, or analysis of variance, depending on the distribution of the values. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. The SUVmax cutoff for predicting malignant IPNB-L was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The optimal SUVmax cutoff, sensitivity, and specificity were determined using the Youden index. An internal validation study was performed after dividing the malignant IPNB-L group into 2 subgroups according to the operation period (before and after the year 2014). A P-value of <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and MedCalc ver. 20.010 (Ostend, Belgium).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Predicting HCC Recurrence After Transplant

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Numerical data were presented as the mean and standard deviation or median and range. Continuous variables were compared using the Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test depending on the distribution pattern, and incidence variables were compared using the chi-square test. The cutoffs of sPD-1 concentration and ADV score for predicting posttransplant HCC recurrence were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, with the optimal cutoff, sensitivity, and specificity determined using the Youden index. Tumor recurrence and overall patient survival rates were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazard regression was used for multivariate analysis, with the results presented as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). A P-value of <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS ver. 22 (IBM Corp., New York, NY, USA) and MedCalc ver. 20.010 (MedCalc, Ostend, Belgium).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Survival Analysis of Oncology Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Categorical variables are presented as numbers (percentages) and continuous variables as medians (interquartile ranges, IQRs). Fisher exact test or the chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables, while the Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare continuous variables. The 1-year overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis. The OS was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of death. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using MedCalc ver. 20 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium) and IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluating Thrombocytopenia in COVID-19

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data entry, processing, and statistical analysis were carried out using MedCalc Ver. 20 (MedCalc). For descriptive statistics, mean and SD were used for continuous variables, while frequencies and percentages were utilized for categorical variables. Student's t‐test was used as a significance test for continuous variables, and the Chi‐square test was used for categorical variables. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive value of thrombocytopenia for COVID‐19 outcomes. p Values less than 0.05 (5%) were considered statistically insignificant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Analysis of Spine Deformity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pearson correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationships between ODI, VAS for back and leg pain, HRQoL, CSA, and sagittal radiographic parameters (SVA, PT, PI, LL, and PI–LL). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to examine the relationships between variables such as age, sex, BMI, radiographic parameters, CSA, and functional scales (SF-36 PCS). All statistical analyses were performed using MedCalc ver. 20 (MedCalc, Mariakerke, Belgium), and p-values of < 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. We conducted linear mixed-model analyses in open-source PLINK/SEQ software (v0.10, released 14-July-2014) to test all associations. Plink/SEQ supports the -glm function for regression on every single variant and gene-based tests (low frequency and rare variants). Sex was used as a covariate in all statistical tests. The burden and SKAT-O (sequence kernel association test and the optimal unified test) were performed for low frequency and rare variants.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Minimum Sample Size Determination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The minimum size of the sample was determined based on the formula:
where Nmin, minimum sample size; NPNP, population from which the sample is selected n = 2,131, α—level of confidence for the results = 95%, f—fraction size = 0.5 e—maximum error assumed 5% = 0.05 (Zalewska and Niemiro, 2022 (link)).
The statistical analysis of the material was conducted using MedCalc ver.20.104 package. Distributions of the variables were determined by means of Shapiro–Wilk test. The results were presented as average and standard deviation completed with the median. The analysis of differences was performed using nonparametric tests (Mann–Whitney U-test). To analyze the qualitative variables, Chi-squared test was used. Relationships between the variables were investigated using Spearman’s rank correlation tests.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Premature Mortality Risk Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microsoft Office Excel 2016 (Los Angeles, CA, USA) in combination with XLSTAT (Version 2019) were used to process data. Statistical analysis was carried out using the STATISTICA 13 computer software (TIBCO Software, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) and MedCalc ver. 20.104 software. Power analysis was conducted in G*Power to determine a sufficient sample size using an α value of 0.05, a power of 0.80, and a large effect size. The normality of variable distribution was checked with Shapiro–Wilk test. A descriptive analysis was carried out using the mean ± standard deviation. To evaluate the relationship between variables we used Pearson r correlation and linear regression equations. Levels of statistical significance were determined at p < 0.05. With a one-factor variance analysis (ANOVA), we tested the differences between variables and compared using Fisher’s Post Hoc Test. The risk of premature death (ABSI z-score) was calculated according to the methodology of Krakauer and Krakauer [20 (link)]. Premature mortality risk was classified into five categories: very low (<−0.868); low (between −0.868 and −0.272); average (between −0.272 and 0.229); high (between 0.229 and 0.798); and very high (>0.798) [20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!