The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

482 protocols using rabbit anti iba1

1

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Mouse and Human Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were deeply anesthetized and perfused as previously described [11 (link)]. The brain was dissected, post-fixed in 4% PFA overnight, stored in PBS with 0.01% sodium azide, and sectioned at 50 μm using Leica vibratome (Leica VT1000S, Leica Inc., Nussloch, Germany). Floating sections were processed for immunocytochemistry [10 (link)]. All antibodies were obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA) unless otherwise stated. In this study, chicken anti-GFP (1:500), rat anti-GFAP (1:1000; Invitrogen), rabbit anti-Iba1 (1:500; Wako), TMEM 119 (1:500), mouse anti-CCR2 (1:500), and rabbit anti-CD31 (1:500) were used.
For postmortem human samples, slides were baked for 60 min at 60 °C, deparaffinized with xylene for 5 min, and rehydrated in ethanol (100, 95, 70, and 50%). Antigen retrieval was performed as previously reported [17 (link)]. In this study, chicken anti-Map 2 (1:200, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), rat anti-GFAP (1:1000; Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA), rabbit anti-Iba1 (1:500; Wako), TMEM 119 (1:1000), mouse anti-CCR2 (1:500), and rabbit anti-CD31 (1:500) were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Visualizing Microglia and Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To visualize microglia and neurons, sections (Bregma - 1.5 mm) were incubated with rabbit anti-Iba1 (1:1000; Wako) or rabbit anti-NeuN (1:1000; Millipore) primary antibody, respectively, followed by Alexa Fluor 647 donkey anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (1:500, Invitrogen). In order to visualize microglial lysosomes, sections were incubated with rabbit anti-Iba1 (1:1000; Wako) and rat anti-CD68 (1:500; Abcam) primary antibodies, Alexa Fluor 594 donkey anti-rabbit IgG and Alexa Fluor 647 donkey anti-rat IgG secondary antibodies (1:500, Invitrogen), and 0.1% Sudan Black B (Sigma-Aldrich) solution in 70% ethanol for 2 min prior to cover-slipping. Slides were then imaged using a Leica SP8 upright confocal microscope at 63X magnification and sequential optical sections captured using the Leica Application Suite X imaging software. Lipofuscin was imaged at 488 nm excitation and 495–545 nm emission. Sequential optical sections were analyzed using ImageJ software (NIH). For each animal, 2–4 images were quantified and averaged, and these values were used to calculate the mean and standard error for each experimental group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Hippocampal Immunohistochemistry in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were anesthetized with chloral hydrate (100 mg/kg) and transcardially perfused with ice-cold PBS/heparin (50 u/ml) solution followed by 10 % formalin. Brains were then post-fixed for 72 hrs at 4 °C in 10 % formalin and then sliced using a VT1000S vibratome (Leica). Forty-micron coronal sections were collected in 6 pools, each containing16-18 slices, spanning the entire rostral-caudal axis of the hippocampus. Morphological analysis was done by incubating one pool of slices with rabbit anti Iba1 1:1000 (Wako, Cat. #019-19741) overnight at 4 °C. To assess PSD95 and CD68 staining, a second pool of slices was incubated with rabbit anti Iba1 1:500 (Wako, Cat. #019-19741), PSD95 1:100 (Merck-Millipore, Cat. # MAB1596), and CD68 1:400 (BioRad, Cat. # MCA1957T), followed by fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies (ThermoFisher, 1:400). Stained slices were then mounted on glass slides with VECTASHIELD HardSet antifade mounting medium with DAPI (Vector laboratories Cat# 10955).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Hippocampal Immunohistochemistry in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were anesthetized with chloral hydrate (100 mg/kg) and transcardially perfused with ice-cold PBS/heparin (50 u/ml) solution followed by 10 % formalin. Brains were then post-fixed for 72 hrs at 4 °C in 10 % formalin and then sliced using a VT1000S vibratome (Leica). Forty-micron coronal sections were collected in 6 pools, each containing16-18 slices, spanning the entire rostral-caudal axis of the hippocampus. Morphological analysis was done by incubating one pool of slices with rabbit anti Iba1 1:1000 (Wako, Cat. #019-19741) overnight at 4 °C. To assess PSD95 and CD68 staining, a second pool of slices was incubated with rabbit anti Iba1 1:500 (Wako, Cat. #019-19741), PSD95 1:100 (Merck-Millipore, Cat. # MAB1596), and CD68 1:400 (BioRad, Cat. # MCA1957T), followed by fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies (ThermoFisher, 1:400). Stained slices were then mounted on glass slides with VECTASHIELD HardSet antifade mounting medium with DAPI (Vector laboratories Cat# 10955).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Hippocampal Amyloid Plaques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sections containing the hippocampal region were washed through free-oating (10 minutes for 3 times), incubated with blocking buffer solution for 30 minutes. and left overnight with the primary antibodies: Aβ plaques (mouse anti-6-E10; 1:1,000; Covance) and microglial cells (rabbit anti-Iba-1; 1:1000, Wako Chemicals). Sections were then washed and incubated in secondary antibodies (anti-mouse, 1:600, Vector BA9200 or anti-rabbit, 1:600, Vector, BA1000) for 2h at room temperature, followed by ABC (Avidin/Biotinylated enzyme Complex Vectastain Elite, Vector) kit incubation for 1h30 and DAB for 5 minutes right after.
The microglia around the plaques were identi ed by immuno uorescence using an anti-6E10 (mouse anti-6-E10; 1:1,000; Covance) and anti-Iba-1 (rabbit anti-Iba-1; 1:1000, Wako Chemicals) antibodies. Brie y, sections were washed and incubated in the primary antibody overnight. On the following day, sections were incubated for 2 h with a uorochrome-conjugated secondary antibody (Alexa 488 and Alexa 546) and washed in PBS. Slides were mounted and sealed with DPX and were subsequently analyzed by uorescence microscopy using the Neurolucida capture software (MBF Bioscience).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ultrastructural Analysis of DAI in Micro Pig Thalamus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the ultrastructural characteristics of DAI in the micro pig thalamus while verifying microglia process contacts on these axonal swellings, a subset of tissue was immunolabeled with either rabbit anti β-APP (1:700; Cat.# 51–2700, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) or rabbit anti Iba-1 (1:1000; Cat.# 019–19741, Wako, Osaka, Japan), followed by incubation with biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:1000; Cat.# BA-1000, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) secondary antibody. The reaction product was visualized with 0.05 % diaminobenzidine/0.01 % hydrogen peroxide/0.3 % imidazole in 0.1 M phosphate buffer and the tissue was prepared for EM analysis. In this approach, tissue sections were osmicated, dehydrated, and embedded in epoxy resin on plastic slides. After resin curing, the slides were studied with routine light microscopy to identify the precise thalamic areas for excision. Once identified, these sites were removed, mounted on plastic studs, and 70-nm sections were cut serially and mounted on Formvar-coated slotted grids. The grids were stained in 5 % uranyl acetate in 50 % methanol and 0.5 % lead citrate. Ultrastructural qualitative analysis was performed using a JEOL JEM 1230 transmission electron microscope (JEOL-USA, Peabody, MA, USA) equipped with Ultrascan 4000SP CCD and Orius SC1000 CCD cameras (Gatan, Pleasanton, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Chick and Mouse Spinal Cord Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spinal cords were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and then cry-protected in 20% sucrose. To detect effective knockdown of Daam2 and PIP5K in the chick, we generated mRNA probes and performed in situ hybridization (Lee and Deneen, 2012 (link)). For chick spinal cord immunohistochemistry, the following antibodies were used: mouse anti-Pax7 (DSHB), anti-Nkx2.2 (DSHB), anti-Myc (Sigma), and rat anti-HA (Sigma). Mouse spinal cord was analyzed using in situ hybridization: MBP, PLP, PDGFRα; and immunohistochemistry: chick anti-beta galactosidase (Abcam 1:1,000), mouse anti-MBP (Covance 1:500), mouse anti-PLP (1:500), rabbit anti-Olig2 (Abcam 1:1,000), rabbit anti-GFAP (Dako 1:1,000), rabbit anti-Iba-1 (Wako 1:1,000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Brain Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunohistochemistry, the following primary antibodies were used: rabbit anti-Iba1 (1:1,000, Wako, Japan) and mouse anti-CD68/ED1 (1:200, AbD Serotec, Germany). Sections were incubated with an appropriate primary antibody overnight at 4°C in blocking serum. This was followed by 2 h of incubation in secondary antibody at room temperature. For each immunohistochemical assessment, some brain sections went through the entire protocol without primary antibody incubation, to serve as the negative controls. The following secondary antibodies were used: Cy3-conjugated donkey anti-mouse/ rabbit (Jackson Immunoresearch, UK), or Alexa-488 conjugated streptavidin (1:200, Invitrogen, Sweden). The sections were mounted on gelatin-coated slides and coverslipped using a glycerol-based mounting medium (DABCO, Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunocytochemistry of Primary Neurons and Microglia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary neurons and N9 microglial cells were washed and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS. Cells were permeabilized with 0.25% Triton in PBS prior to blocking and overnight incubation at 4 °C with primary antibodies: mouse anti-β3-Tubulin (Biolegend) and rabbit anti-Iba1 (Wako) for neurons and microglia, respectively. Secondary antibodies anti-mouse Alexa 488 (Cell Signaling Technologies) and anti-rabbit Alexa 594 (Invitrogen) were incubated for 1 h at RT. Nuclear staining was performed by incubating cells with Hoechst (Sigma) for 5 min at RT. Coverslips were mounted in microscope slides with Fluoroshield (Sigma) and images randomly acquired in a Zeiss Axio Imager Z1 Apotome. Neuronal apoptosis was addressed by evaluating nuclei shape of ten images per condition27 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Microglial Cells in Brain Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen brain tissues were blocked with 10% goat serum in 0.01 M PBS for 1 h and then incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies (Abs). Brain sections (20 μm) were incubated with the following primary Abs: mouse anti-KCa3.1 (1:100; Alomone Labs, Ltd., Jerusalem, Israel) and rabbit anti-Iba1 (1:500; Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan). The brain sections were then washed with 0.01 M PBS and incubated with the respective Alexa Fluor® 488- or 568-conjugated secondary Abs (1:500; Invitrogen Corporation). Fluorescent images were acquired using a TCS SP8 confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). For imaging acquisition, a prescan of all samples was performed to ensure confocal settings below saturation. For each experiment, all images were obtained using the same confocal settings. Six slices at 120 μm intervals from each brain were used to examine Iba1-positive cells. Three microscopic fields (0.01 mm2) were randomly selected in each slice with the same reference position for quantification. The Iba1-positive cell number was counted in a blinded manner, and the area was measured by Leica LAS AF Lite software (Leica, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!