The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using ab186838

1

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Musculoskeletal Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Humeral head and supraspinatus tendon composite were harvested and fixed in the 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS overnight at room temperature. After decalcified and dehydrated, samples were embedded in Tissue-Tek O.C.T. Compound (SAKURA, Torrance, USA) and cut into 10 μm thickness of sagittal sections. Cell samples were fixed in the 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. Both the parts and cell samples were blocked in 5% BSA for 40 min at room temperature and incubated with the primary antibodies anti-DMP1 (Abcam, 1:400, ab13970), anti-GFP (Abcam, 1:400, ab13970 or 1:400, ab290), anti-Sox9 (Abcam, 1:400; ab185966), anti-TGF-βR2 (Abcam, 1:400, ab186838) at 4 °C overnight. After washing, the sections were then incubated with the respective secondary antibodies (1:500, Abcam) for 1 hr at room temperature and sealed with DAPI. The images were captured with a Leica TCS-SP8 confocal microscope (Leica, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Adipocyte TGF-β Signaling Pathway

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adipocyte lysates were prepared in a lysis buffer containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 10 mM EDTA, 50 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 0.1 M sodium fluoride, 10 mM sodium orthovanadate, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 μg/ml aprotinin, 10 μg/ml leupeptin, 2 mM benzamidine and 1% Triton X-100. After protein electrophoresis and transfer, immunoblots were performed using rabbit anti-serum as primary antibody at a 1:1000 dilution. This dilution was used for each of the primary antibodies used for the present study. After washing, the blot was incubated with a 1:10,000 dilution of goat anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase–conjugated secondary antibody followed by a chemiluminescent kit (Immobilon Western; EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) as previously described [56 (link)]. β-actin was used as a loading control. The maximum intensity of each band was quantified using ImageJ software. Ratios of TGF-β1, TGFBR1, TGFBR2, Smad3 and p-Smad3 were normalized to β-actin. Antibodies against TGF-β1 (ab9758). TGFBR1 (ab31013), TGFBR2 (ab186838), SMAD3 (ab227223) and p-Smad3 (ab118825) were products of Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Anti-rabbit IgG antisera were products of Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Danvers, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Chondrocyte Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After lysing in RIPA buffer (Solarbio), cell lysates were centrifuged for protein collection. The concentration of protein sample was tested using a BCA kit (Abcam). Twenty microgram samples were loaded on sodium dodecyl sulfate/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Solarbio). Next, the membranes were blocked in 5% non-fat milk, and then interacted with primary antibodies anti-Sry-type high-mobility-group box 9 (SOX9) (ab3697, 1:1000 dilution, Abcam), anti-collagen type II α 1 (COL2A1) (AB761, 1:100 dilution, Sigma–Aldrich), anti-Aggrecan (AB1031, 1:1000 dilution, Sigma–Aldrich), anti-TGFBR2 (ab186838, 1:500 dilution, Abcam) or anti-β-actin (ab227387, 1:5000 dilution, Abcam) and the secondary antibody conjugated by horseradish peroxidase (ab205718, 1:20000 dilution, Abcam). β-actin functioned as a loading control. Subsequently, the protein blots were developed via exposing to ECL reagent (Solarbio) and tested by ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, U.S.A.). Relative protein level was normalized to the control group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying TGFβ Receptor Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein was extracted from the AGS and MKN45 cells after the transfection for 48 h using a RIPA lysis buffer (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.). Protein determination was detected using a BCA Protein Assay kit (CWBio). A total of 20 µg protein of each group was loaded on a 10% gel, resolved using SDS-PAGE and subsequently transferred to a PVDF membrane. The membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat milk at room temperature for 1 h. The protein was incubated with primary antibodies for at 4°C overnight and secondary antibodies at room temperature for 1 h. The following antibodies were used in this research: Anti-TGFβ1 antibody (1:500; ab92486; Abcam), anti-TGFβR1 antibody (1:500; ab31013; Abcam), anti-TGFβR2 antibody (1:500; ab186838; Abcam), anti-TGFβR3 antibody (1:200; ab97459; Abcam) and goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:5000; ab6721; Abcam). An Enhanced ECL Chemiluminescent Substrate kit (Shanghai Maokang; maokangbio.com/index.action) was used for visualization. Protein level was analyzed using ImageJ version 1.41 (National Institutes of Health).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Fibroblast Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical stains were performed with an automated immunostainer (Autostainer 720, Labvision) according to standard heat-induced epitope retrieval and the avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex method. Antibodies used in the present study are α-SMA (Abcam CAT#ab32575, RRID: AB_722,538), TGFBR1 (Abcam CAT#ab31013, RRID: AB_778,352), TGFBR2 (Abcam CAT#ab186838, RRID: AB_2,728,775), which have been validated the pilot study beforehand. Sections were incubated overnight at 4°C and were counterstained with Hematoxylin (Thermo Electron Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, US). The scoring procedure was applied as the previous studies mentioned about [26] (link). Two pathologists evaluated independently without informed of the group information beforehand. About 100 fibroblasts stained positively filed were defined as target filed which the percentage of total cells were carefully inspected. The Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to determine the difference between these groups. In this study, we set p-value<0.05 as statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Protein Extraction and Western Blotting Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein was extracted from cells and tissues using RIPA lysis buffer (#P0013B, Beyotime). SDS-PAGE loading buffer (#MB2479, Meilunbio) was mixed with adsorbing protein onto the PVDF membrane by gel electrophoresis. Aggrecan (13880-1-AP, 1:1000, Proteintech), MMP13 (18165-1-AP, 1:800, Proteintech), TGFβR2 (ab186838, 1:1000, Abcam), Akt/mTOR pathway-related factors Akt (10176-1-AP, 1:1000, Proteintech), p-Akt (ab38449, 1:1000, Abcam), mTOR (66888-1-Ig, 1:10,000, Proteintech) and p-mTOR (67778-1-Ig, 1:10,000, Proteintech), and pyroptosis markers Cleaved caspase-1 (4199, 1:1000, CST), NLRP3 (19771-1-AP, 1:800, Proteintech), ASC-1 (PA5-90403, 1:1000, Invitrogen), and GSDMD (PA5-30823, 1:5000, Invitrogen) and autophagy markers LC3 (14600-1-AP, 1:2500, Proteintech), p62 (66184-1-Ig, 1:4000, Proteintech) primary antibodies, and β-actin (66009-1-IG, 1:1000, Proteintech) were incubated overnight at 4 ​°C. Then secondary antibodies were incubated. ECL chromogenic exposure was performed, protein bands were detected, and β-actin acted as the internal reference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Osteocyte Characteristics via Immunohistochemistry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunohistochemistry, paraffin embedded (7μm thick) sections were incubated with primary antibodies for anti-MMP13 (1:100; Abcam, ab39012); anti-MMP14 (1:100; Abcam, ab38971); anti-CTSK (1:75; Abcam, ab19027), or anti-TβRII (1:500; Abcam, ab186838). This was followed by incubation with corresponding biotinylated secondary antibody, avidin-conjugated peroxidase, and diaminobenzidine substrate chromogen system (Innovex Universal Animal IHC kit). Corresponding nonimmune IgGs were used as negative controls. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and TUNEL-DAPI staining were performed to visualize osteocyte number and apoptosis. Ploton silver staining (Jauregui et al., 2016 (link); Ploton et al., 1986 (link)) was performed for visualization of the osteocyte lacuno-canalicular network. Images were acquired using a Nikon Eclipse E800 bright-field microscope and analyzed with ImageJ. Sections were evaluated for one femur from each of n≥4 mice/group. Additional details of immunohistochemistry and image analysis are described in the Supplemental Data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Probing Intestinal Epithelial TGF-β Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sixty micrograms of protein extracted from the isolated rat intestinal epithelial tissues samples was separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane. Blots were blocked for 1 h in 5 % BSA and then incubated with primary antibodies for overnight at room temperature [4 (link)]. Primary antibodies were directed against TGFβ1 (1:500) (Ab64715, Abcam), TβR1 (1:750) (Ab31013, Abcam), TβR2 (1:500) (Ab186838, Abcam), smad3 (1:1000) (#9523, CST), Snail (1:1000) (Ab180714, Abcam), E-cadherin (1:1000) (Ab76055, Abcam), and Fibronectin (1:1500) (Ab6328, Abcam). The films were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence system (Pierce Company, Minneapolis, MN, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Protein Expression Analysis of TGF-β Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein was extracted from treated cells using RIPA buffer. Equal amounts of cell extracts were fractionated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blotting and visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence. The following primary antibodies were employed: antipro-COL1A1 (SC-8782, Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA), anti-TGF-β1 (ab92486, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-TGF-β receptor I antibody (ab31013, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-TGF-β receptor II (ab186838, Abcam, Cambridge, MA USA), antiphospho-Smad2/Smad3 (8828, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-Smad2/3 (3102, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-CTGF (SC-14939, Santa Cruz, California) and anti-GAPDH antibody (sc-47724, Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA) The quantification of protein bands was carried out using GelPro Analysis Software (Media Cybernetics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Protein Expression Analysis of Skin Cell Types

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein lysates were prepared from keratinocytes and fibroblasts using RIPA buffer containing Halt protease/phosphatase inhibitors in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). Twenty-five micrograms of protein was electrophoresed using 4–12% gradient SDS-polyacrylamide gels, transferred to PVDF membrane and blocked with 5% BSA. Primary antibodies for HGF (Abcam; cat #ab83760), TGFβ (Abcam; cat #ab92486), TGFβR1 (Abcam; ab31013), TGFβR2 (Abcam; ab186838), SMAD2 (Abcam; ab63576), SMAD4 (Abcam; ab236321) MET (Cell Signaling; cat #3127), p-MET (Abcam; ab5662), GAPDH (Cell Signaling, Cat #5174), B-actin (Cell Signaling; Cat #4970), tubulin (Cell Signaling, Cat #15115) were incubated with membranes at 1:1000. Anti-rabbit HRP secondary antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology), followed by West Dura Chemilluminescent substrate (Thermo, Rockland, IL) were used for signal detection. Bands were quantified using NIH Image J and normalized to the densitometry for the respective housekeeping gene. All Western blots used pooled protein from triplicate samples and were repeated a minimum of three times. Quantification of Western blots is displayed in Supplementary data A.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!