The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using igg2a

1

Comparative Analysis of CD161 Receptor Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ligand-binding domains were compared between CD161/TT and /CC receptors by studying binding of LLT1-Fc to 293-161/TT and /CC transfectants. The cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of LLT1-Fc and binding of the soluble ligand was monitored by staining with PE-conjugated goat anti-human IgG (Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA, USA). Furthermore, the “epitope landscape” of the ligand-binding loop was compared between CD161/TT and /CC by studying the affinity of the anti-CD161 mAb 191B8 (IgG2a, Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Characterization of this mAb and two additional anti-CD161 mAb (DX12, IgG1; B199.2 IgG1, AbD Serotec) revealed that only 191B8 blocks LLT1 binding, suggesting that the 191B8 epitope is part of the ligand-binding domain of CD161. 293-161/TT and /CC transfectants were incubated with an antibody mixture consisting of saturating concentrations (10 μg/ml) of PE-labelled B199.2 and increasing concentrations of unlabelled 191B8. Affinity of 191B8 to this epitope was assessed by studying its capacity to replace/compete with binding of mAb B199.2 which detects an epitope closely related to the 191B8 epitope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Isolation and Purification of CD14+ Monocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CD14+ monocytes were isolated as described before (ten Harkel et al., 2015). Briefly, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from human buffy coats from healthy donors (Sanquin, The Netherlands) using Ficoll‐Paque density gradient centrifugation. Subsequently, cells were incubated with CD14‐antibody tagged microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) and sorted using a manual MACS magnetic cell sorter (Miltenyi Biotec) according to the manufacturer's instructions (Davison et al., 2014). The purity of the cells was determined with flow cytometry (FACSverse; BD Biosciences, Piscataway). For analysis, cells were incubated with fluoresceine isothiocyanate (FITC) labeled anti‐human CD14 (Miltenyi Biotec) or its equivalent isotype control IgG2a (Miltenyi Biotec), and incubated for 30 min in the dark on ice. After incubation, cells were washed to remove unbound antibodies, recovered in FACS buffer and analyzed (30 s or 100,000 viable events) on a BD Bioscience FACSverse flow cytometer. Purity was confirmed to be at least 80%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation and Characterization of CD14+ Monocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the initial TRAcP staining and QPCR experiments CD14+ monocytes were isolated from the blood from 6 FOP patients and sex- and age- matched controls (20–40 ml blood per donor), for all other experiments human buffy coats (Sanquin, The Netherlands) or blood from healthy donors was used. The CD14+ cells were isolated as described before (23 (link)).
Briefly, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated using Ficoll-Paque density gradient centrifugation. Subsequently cells were incubated with CD14-antibody tagged microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) and sorted using a manual MACS magnetic cell sorter (Miltenyi Biotec) according to the manufacturer's instructions (24 (link)). The purity of the cells was determined with flow cytometry (FACSverse™, BD Biosciences, Piscataway, USA). For the analysis, cells were incubated with FITC labeled anti-human CD14 (Miltenyi Biotec) or its equivalent isotype control IgG2a (Miltenyi Biotec) for 30 min in the dark on ice. After incubation, cells were washed to remove unbound antibodies, recovered in FACS buffer and analyzed (30 s or 100,000 viable events) on a BD Bioscience FACSverse flow cytometer. Purity was confirmed to be at least 80%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunophenotyping of Cell Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following passage 1 × 105 cells were collected into 1.5 mL tubes, then centrifuged, and the supernatant removed. IgG1 (mouse monoclonal, 130-098-845, Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany), CD19 (130-098-168, Miltenyi Biotec), CD73 (130-097-943, Miltenyi Biotec), CD90 (130-097-932, Miltenyi Biotec), CD105 (130-098-906, Miltenyi Biotec), IgG2a (mouse monoclonal, 130-098-849, Miltenyi Biotec), CD14 (130-098-167, Miltenyi Biotec), CD34 (130-098-140, Miltenyi Biotec), CD45 (130-098-141, Miltenyi Biotec), and HLA-DR (130-098-177, Miltenyi Biotec) were diluted (1:1000) in FACS (PBS with 0.5% (w/v) BSA (Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK ) buffer and added to specific tubes for 15 min at 4 °C in the dark. After incubation, cells were washed with FACS buffer and 5 min centrifuged at 900 rpm. Pellets were then resuspended in 300 μL of FACS buffer. A total of 50,000 events were recorded for each sample using Beckman Coulter Cytomics FC 500.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!