The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using digidoc it

1

RAPD-PCR Amplification Protocol for DNA Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RAPD-PCR reactions were performed using the OLP 13 primer (5’-ACCGCCTGCT-3’) (Zare et al., 2019 (link)), and a 25μl reaction mix, containing 3mM MgCl2 (Bio Line, London, UK), 0.5 mM dNTPs (New England BioLabs, UK), 1 µM of primer, 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Bio Taq DNA polymerase, Meridian Bioscience, USA) in 1X PCR buffer (Meridian Bioscience, USA) and 3 μl of template dsDNA, was prepared. PCR was performed as follows: 1 cycle at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles at 93°C for 1 min, 37°C for 1.5 min, and 72°C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72°C for 7 min (Mastercycler pro, Eppendorf, Germany). Amplification products were solved by electrophoresis on 1% agarose-TBE gel, stained with 5µl of “Midori Green Advance DNA Stain” (Nippon Genetics Europe GmbH, Germany), visualized under UV transilluminator (UVP Inc., Cambridge) and photographed with DigiDoc-It (UVP, Cambridge) system. To guarantee the reproducibility of RAPD-PCR profiles, the reactions were carried out in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Species-Specific PCR for Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Species-specific PCR was performed as described elsewhere (Hogardt et al., 2007 (link)). Negative and positive control PCRs were employed for every experiment. PCR products were visualized by electrophoresis in a 2% agarose gel (Invitrogen Corporation, CA), stained with ethidium bromide (EtBr; Invitrogen Corporation), and captured with a DigiDoc-It (UVP, Cambridge, United Kingdom) photographic system. Bands of 163 bp were considered positive for A. xylosoxidans identification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RAPD Amplification and Gel Electrophoresis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The RAPD amplification mixture and cycling conditions were described elsewhere (Lambiase et al., 2006 (link)). The primer used was the 270 (5′-TGCGCGCGGG-3′). RAPD products were separated by electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel (Invitrogen Corporation, CA). Molecular size markers (Invitrogen Corporation) and negative control were included in all gels. Gels were stained with EtBr (at 0.5 μM) (Invitrogen Corporation) and captured with a DigiDoc-It (UVP) photographic system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Pfcrt Gene Amplification and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DNA from 1 mL blood samples was extracted using a QIAamp™ DNA Blood Midi Kit (QIAGEN), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCRs were performed to amplify the pfcrt fragment gene according to previously described protocols [25 (link)]. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gel and visualized under a UV transilluminator (DigiDoc-It, UVP, Upland, CA, USA). Each PCR product was purified using Wizard™ SV Gel and the PCR Clean-Up System (Promega, WI, USA), following the manufacturer’s procedure. Purified DNA sequencing was carried out through Big Dye™ Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction version 3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA), with 3.2 μM of forward and reverse PCR primers. DNA sequences to investigate C72S, M74I, N75E/D, and K76T were determined using an ABI Prism DNA Analyzer™ 3730 (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA), on the Fiocruz Genomic Platform PDTIS/Fiocruz RPT01A. Nucleotide sequences were aligned using the ClustalW multiple sequence aligner in the BioEdit software [26 ]. The PF3D7_1343700 strain was used as a reference sequence (from PlasmoDB: http://www.plasmoDB.org, accessed on 20 March 2023). DNA sequences were deposited in GenBank (the NIH’s genetic sequence database; www.ncbi/nlm/nih.gov/GenBank, accessed on 21 March 2023) with the accession numbers OQ672386-OQ672451.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Virulence Gene Detection in Bacillus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All strains were evaluated for the presence of sequences associated with virulence genes by PCR. Genes encoding for cereulide (ces) (Ehling-Schulz et al., 2005) , cytotoxin K (cytK) (Ehling-Schulz et al., 2006) , sphingomyelinase (sph) (Hsieh et al., 1999) ; the components of hemolysin BL (hblA, hblB, hblC, hblD) (Granum et al., 1996; Ryan et al., 1997 ) and the non-hemolytic complex (nheAB) (Guinebretière et al., 2010) were studied. Primers used and conditions of amplification are listed in Table 1. DNA amplifications were performed in a thermal cycler (Mastercycler personal; Eppendorf Hamburg, Germany). The amplification products were separated in 1.6% (W/V) agarose gel in 0.5× TBE buffer, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized with a UV transilluminator (UVP, Upland, California, USA). Gel images were digitalized by using a digital image capture gel documentation system (DigiDoc-It, UVP, v.1.1.25, Upland, California, US).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!