The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ge voluson e8

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in United States, Austria

The GE Voluson E8 is a high-performance ultrasound system designed for women's healthcare applications. It offers advanced imaging capabilities and features to support diagnostic procedures.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using ge voluson e8

1

Ultrasound and Doppler Evaluation of Fetal Growth

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ultrasound and Doppler evaluations were performed using General Electric (GE) Vivid 9 or GE Voluson E8 (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) ultrasound equipment with 2- to 5-MHz or 4- to 6-MHz probes. In normally grown fetuses, gestational age was confirmed prior to 11 weeks by the crown-rump length measurement; no complications were documented during pregnancy; delivery occurred between 37 and 42 weeks of gestation; and birth weight was normal83 (link). Estimated fetal weight was calculated using the Hadlock formula84 (link). For growth-restricted fetuses, gestational age was estimated in accordance with the earliest ultrasound scan.
Doppler evaluation was performed in the umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery, and ductus venosus85 (link). Recordings were obtained in the absence of maternal or fetal movement with an angle of insonation as close as possible to 0° and with a high-pass wall filter of 60 MHz. Three to five consecutive and regular waveforms were obtained and the pulsatility index (PI) was calculated86 (link). A PI value ≥2 SD for gestational age was considered abnormal87 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Midluteal Uterine Artery Blood Flow Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An ultrasound examination of uterine artery blood flow was performed using a 2.9-MHz (range, 2–5 MHz) transvaginal microconvex probe (GE Voluson E8; GE Healthcare Austria GmbH & Co OG, Zipf, Austria). The examiners were blinded to the history of all subjects.
Ultrasonic Doppler assessment was performed during the midluteal phase at 7 to 10 days after women’s ovulation, which was confirmed by follicular monitoring through an ultrasound examination. Serum progesterone levels were measured during the midluteal phase with an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (Beckman Coulter, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fetal Ultrasound Screening with GE Voluson E8

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The GE Voluson E8 color Doppler ultrasound system (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) was selected and operated with C-5-D and RA84-8-D probes. The pregnant woman was placed in the supine position and the fetus was screened according to routine early pregnancy ultrasound.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Standardized Uterine Artery Doppler Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UtA Doppler, including calculation of the left and right UtA-PI and -RI, was measured by trained sonographers using GE Voluson-E6 or GE Voluson-E8 ultrasound devices (GE Healthcare, Zipf, Austria) according to standardized protocols [14 (link)]. The ultrasonographers placed the probe on the lower quadrant of the abdomen after identification of the uterine artery at the intersection with the external iliac artery employing color Doppler. At insonation angles of < 30°, pulsed-wave Doppler was used to obtaining at least three similar flow velocity waveforms for each side. Measurements for both right and left UtA PI/RI were calculated. Intra- and inter-observer repeatability was examined by 95% limits of agreement (Bland–Altman method) [15 (link)] using the right UtA-PI data of 50 randomly selected pregnant women without preeclampsia. The result showed that the UtA Doppler measurement had good repeatability (Figure S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transvaginal Ultrasound Evaluation of Ovarian Masses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All participants underwent transvaginal ultrasonography whenever possible. If a mass was too large to be fully displayed on transvaginal ultrasonography, it could be supplemented with a transabdominal US. Transrectal or transabdominal ultrasonography could be performed if a patient was unsuitable for transvaginal ultrasonography. The following US equipment was used in the study: GE Voluson E10, GE Voluson E8, GE Healthcare (GE Medical Systems, Zipf, Austria), and Mindray Resona R9 (Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd., China), with RIC5-9-D, V11-3HU transvaginal US probes, and C1-5-D and SC6-1U abdominal US probes. Recorded US semantic features included: maximum diameter of the lesion (≤ 50, 50–100, and ≥ 100 mm), characteristics of the mass (cystic, cystic-solid mixed, solid), colour Doppler score (1, no blood flow signal; 2, low blood flow signal; 3, moderate blood flow signal; 4, rich blood flow signal), laterality of the mass (unilateral or bilateral), and ascites (present or absent). If a patient had more than one ovarian mass, we selected the mass with the most complex morphology or the largest for further assessment [12 (link), 29 (link), 30 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ultrasound Characterization of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). The study was approved by the ethics committee of Pudong New Area People’s Hospital (No. 2022-131), and individual consent for this retrospective analysis was waived. The images were consecutively collected between 1 August 2020 and 1 December 2021. A total of 557 benign and 506 malignant BLs from Pudong New Area People’s Hospital were screened, and 1,063 patients were enrolled in this work. For patients with multiple BLs, only the most suspicious or the largest diameter BL was selected. The exclusion criteria and enrollment process are shown in Figure 1. The patients were aged from 29 to 78 years. The size of each BL was measured as the largest diameter of each BL. All US images were obtained from Siemens S3000 (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany), Philips Epiq 7 (Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), Philips IU Elite (Philips Healthcare), GE Voluson E8 (GE Medical Systems, Chicago, IL, USA), and Toshiba Aplio 400 (Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan).
The US image data were reviewed by 2 radiologists with at least 5 years of experience in interpreting breast US images by consensus. The radiologists were blinded to the pathology results. In cases of disagreement, a senior radiologist with more than 20 years of experience in breast US imaging was consulted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive 3D Uterine Ultrasound Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used three-dimensional ultrasound instruments (GE Voluson E8 and E10, GE Healthcare, Tiefenbach, Zipf, Austria). All instruments were equipped with high frequency intracavitary probe (RIC5-9-D, 5–9 MHz). All patients underwent transvaginal (or transrectal) ultrasound scan in a lithotomy position with an empty bladder, combined with transabdominal scan if necessary.
Every assessment of the uterus should start with identification of the bladder and the cervix. The position of the uterus was noted and measurements taken. The uterus was scanned in the sagittal plane from cornu to cornu and in the (oblique) transverse plane from the cervix to the fundus. Having established an overview of the whole uterus, the image was magnified to contain only the uterine corpus. The magnification should be as large as possible, focusing on the area of interest (13 (link)). The probes collected grayscale images and color Doppler ultrasound or energy Doppler ultrasound images of the uterus and bilateral appendages from left to right in multiple sections, and the images or dynamic videos were stored in the hard disk of the machines or in the ultrasonic workstation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Ultrasound Imaging Instruments and Settings

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DDH-SUSC collaboration group used GE Voluson E8, GE Logic E9 (General Electric Company, Boston, MA), Philips IU 22, Philips IU Elite, Philips CX50, Philips Epiq5 (Royal Philips, Amsterdam, Netherlands), Mindray DC-7 (Mindray Medical International, Shenzhen, China), ESaote Mylab (ESaote Company, Genoa, Italy), Toshiba Aplio500, Toshiba AlokaF75 (Toshiba Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), Hitachi Vision Preirus (Hitachi Company, Tokyo, Japan), and other ultrasonic instruments with a high-frequency (6-12 MHz) linear array probe for ultrasound experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Placental Segmentation from Ultrasound Volumes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
This human study was approved by the University of Pennsylvania Institutional
Review Board - approval: 811129. All adult participants provided written
informed consent to participate in this study.
Ultrasound volume datasets were obtained at 11–14 weeks’
gestation using GE Voluson E8 (GE Healthcare, WI, USA) ultrasound machines. The
“max quality” setting was used during the acquisition of the
images, and sector width and sweep angle were increased to ensure inclusion of
the entire placenta within the 3D sweep. The resulting raw images are in various
dimensions, ranging from 245×265×173 to 714×726×488
voxels. The mean voxel dimensions were 0.49±0.04 mm, uniform in all 3
axes.
In addition to the N=442 SGA study set, we use two more datasets for
developing the segmentation pipeline, with the placenta manually labeled as
ground truth. The CNNs are trained on an N=99 training set, under a 4-fold
cross-validation scheme for tuning the models. After training and tuning is
complete, we use an N=25 test set to measure the segmentation performance. The
N=442 SGA study set, the N=99 train set, and the N=25 test set are all
independent from each other.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Ovarian Tumor Ultrasonography Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All participants underwent transvaginal ultrasonography whenever feasible. Transabdominal ultrasonography was performed in cases where the tumour size prevented complete visualisation using transvaginal ultrasonography. Transrectal or transabdominal ultrasonography was performed if the patient was unsuitable for a transvaginal ultrasound examination. Some ultrasound equipment, such as GE Voluson E10, GE Voluson E8, GE Healthcare (GE Medical Systems, Zipf, Austria), and Mindray Resona R9, was used for data collection. The transducers used in this study included the RIC5-9-D and V11-3HU transvaginal probes and the C1-5-D and SC6-1U transabdominal probes. Various ultrasound semantic features were recorded, such as the maximum diameter of the lesion and its classification (≤ 50 mm, 50–100 mm, and ≥ 100 mm), the characteristics of the mass (cystic, mixed cystic and solid, and solid), the colour flow score (1, no flow signal; 2, small amount of blood flow signal; 3, moderate blood flow signal; and 4, enriched blood flow signals), the side of the lesion (unilateral or bilateral), and the presence or absence of ascites. The mass with the most complex morphological structure or the largest volume was selected when multiple ovarian-adnexal masses were present [18 (link), 37 (link), 43 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!