The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Jsm 6510 scanning electron microscope

Manufactured by JEOL
Sourced in Japan, Germany

The JSM-6510 is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) manufactured by JEOL. It is designed to produce high-resolution images of small-scale samples by scanning the surface with a focused beam of electrons. The JSM-6510 SEM provides users with the capability to observe and analyze the microstructure of materials at the nanometer scale.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using jsm 6510 scanning electron microscope

1

Micro-CT and SEM Imaging of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples were scanned with the Skyscan 1072 Micro-CT (Bruker, Artselaar, Belgium), with a linear resolution of 3.50 µm at a magnification of 80, with an accelerating voltage of 80 kV and tube current of 122 µA. The projection images were acquired over 180° at angular increments of 0.23° with an exposure time of 2.57 seconds per frame, averaged over six frames. Three-dimensional images were reconstructed using the reconstruction software provided by the manufacturer (NRecon Version 1.6.4.1), where the ring artifact reduction was applied as needed.
The samples were sputtered using the Cressington 108 Auto Sputter Coater with an Au coating thickness of 13 nm and studied in the JSM 6510 Scanning Electron Microscope (JEOL, Freising, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Scanning electron microscopy of hAM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
hAM explants were washed in 1x PBS, then fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS (AppliChem, Germany) for 60 min at room temperature and afterwards dehydrated in an ascending ethanol series. After incubating in an ascending hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) series, the membranes were air dried under the fume hood overnight. Then the biopsies were mounted onto double-sided sticky tape on top of an aluminium stub and sputter coated with Pd-Au using a Polaron SC7620 sputter coater (Quorum Technologies Ltd, GB). Afterwards they were analysed using a JEOL JSM-6510 scanning electron microscope (Jeol GmbH, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

SEM Sample Preparation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For SEM, SSC were dried by a graded ethanol series (40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%, 15 min each) and by increasing ethanol–hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) series up to 100% (33%, 66%, 100%—1 h each). Subsequently, the specimens were sputter coated with Pd–Au using a Polaron SC7620 sputter coater (Quorum Technologies Ltd., East Grinstead, UK), and examined using a JEOL JSM-6510 scanning electron microscope (Jeol GmbH, Eching/Munich, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Micro-CT and SEM Analysis of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples were scanned with a Skyscan 1072 micro-CT (Bruker, Artselaar, Belgium) with a linear resolution of 3.50 µm at a magnification of 80 with an accelerating voltage of 80 kV and tube current of 122 µA. Projection images were acquired over 180° at angular increments of 0.23° with an exposure time of 2.57 seconds per frame, averaged over six frames. Three-dimensional images were reconstructed using the reconstruction software provided by the manufacturer (NRecon Version 1.6.4.1, Micro Photonics Inc., Allentown, PA, USA), where the ring artifact reduction was applied as needed.
Samples were sputtered using a Cressington 108 auto sputter coater with Au coating thickness of 13 nm and studied in a JEOL JSM 6510 scanning electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fibrin Clot Ultrastructure Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fibrin clot ultrastructure was assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Clots were prepared as described above. After fixation with 4% phosphate‐buffered formalin for 2 h, the samples were washed with ddH2O and subsequently dehydrated with an ascending EtOH series (15% EtOH/ddH2O to EtOH abs. in 15% increments). Samples were then chemically dried with hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS), mounted onto aluminium stubs and sputter coated with Pd‐Au using a Quorum Q 150 R sputter coater (Quorum Technologies Ltd.) with a gold target. Samples were then imaged with a JSM‐6510 scanning electron microscope (JEOL Ltd.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Physicochemical Characterization of Hot-Melt Extrudate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raman spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were performed to determine the physicochemical properties of the hot-melt extrudate, which was processed based on computational simulation. Raman analysis was performed using a portable Raman spectrometer (BWTEK BWS465-532S, Newark, NY, USA). The analytical time was 10 s, and the laser was injected five times. For XRD, the Bruker D8 Focus (Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) at 40 kV and 50 mA was used. The XRD data were collected in increments of 0.02° and the 2 range from 10–50° at 1 s/step. SEM was used to detect any physical changes in the matrix systems. The images were collected using a JSM-6510 scanning electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at 20 kV and magnification of 500 ×. To increase sensitivity, before sample detection, samples were coated with gold nanoparticles. The images were acquired under the same conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Visualizing Cardiac Scaffold-Embedded Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To confirm cATMSC-EV presence within scaffolds, cardiac scaffolds loaded with NIR815-labelled EV were maintained for 1 week at 37 °C, 5% CO2, after which they were washed with PBS and processed for SEM. Briefly, after fixation with 10% formalin (Sigma Aldrich) and washing with distilled water, scaffolds were dehydrated in ethanol solutions of increasing concentrations, and dried using a CO2 critical point dryer (EmiTech K850; Quorum Technologies), as detailed previously [26 (link)]. The scaffolds were then sputter-coated in gold using the JFC 1100 ion sputter (Jeol), and scanned under a JSM-6510 scanning electron microscope (Jeol) at 15 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of Chitosan-based Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The molecular structure and interaction of chitosan, TC, and STC composites were investigated by Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR). The FTIR samples were prepared as KBr pellets, and the spectrum was collected at a resolution of 4 cm−1 with 32 scans per run by using a Bruker Tensor 27 FTIR spectrometer (Ettlingen, Germany). The morphology of the samples was characterized by using a JEOL JSM-6510 scanning electron microscope (Tokyo, Japan). The dried samples were coated with gold before the characterization for better imaging. The surface of the samples was analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and Auger electron spectra (AES) in AXIS ULTRA DLD (Kratos Analytical Ltd., Manchester, UK) with Al Kα (1486.6 eV) radiation as the excitation source, the analysis was done in the pressures on the order of 10−8 Pa. The charges of the samples were corrected by setting the binding energy of the C1s peak at 284.8 eV. The bandgap of the samples was characterized with UV/Vis spectroscopy (SHIMADZU UV-2550 spectrophotometer, Kyoto, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Elemental Composition Analysis via EDX

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Energy‐dispersive X‐ray (EDX) microanalysis was used to qualitatively establish the presence of chemical elements in the samples. The samples of all brands were mounted on aluminium stubs and examined using a JSM‐6510 Scanning Electron Microscope (JEOL) fitted with an energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectrometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!