The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Xm10 digital camera system

Manufactured by Olympus
Sourced in Japan

The Olympus XM10 Digital Camera System is a compact and versatile camera designed for laboratory and scientific applications. It offers high-resolution image capture with a 10-megapixel sensor, providing detailed documentation of specimens and experimental setups. The XM10 features a range of connectivity options, including USB and HDMI ports, enabling seamless integration with various imaging software and analysis tools. The camera is designed to deliver consistent and reliable performance in controlled laboratory environments.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

4 protocols using xm10 digital camera system

1

In Vitro Scratch Wound Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded in 6 well plate at a density of 7.5 × 105 cell/well and allowed reach confluence at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Then, a “wound” was made by manual scratching with a 200 µL pipette tip and cells were gently washed with 1× PBS. The “wounded” areas were photographed in specific wound sites (two sites for each wound) at 40× magnification using an Olympus IX51 inverted microscope equipped with an Olympus XM10 Digital Camera System every 24 h until wound closure. The relative migration distance (5 measures by wound) was calculated with the following formula: relative migration distance (%) = (A–B)/C × 100, where A is the width of cell wound at 0 h incubation, B is the width of cell wound after specific h of incubation, and C is the width mean of cell wound for 0 h of incubation. For relative migration distance, the results were analyzed using the beWound-Cell Migration Tool (Version 1.5) [50 ]. At least three independent experiments were performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cell Migration Capacity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For migration capacities, cells were seeded (6‐well plate) in complete DMEM at an optimal density to obtain at least 95% of confluence in the next 24 h and incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2. The procedure and the calculation formula were performed as previously described [34 ].
The wound areas were photographed in two specific sites at 40× magnification using an Olympus IX51 inverted microscope equipped with an Olympus XM10 Digital Camera System (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). At least three independent experiments were performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

In Vitro Cell Migration Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UMUC3KD and UMUC3CTRL cells were seeded in 6-well plate at a density of 7.5x105 cell/well and allowed reach confluence at 37ºC, 5% CO2. Then, a “wound” was made by manual scratching with a 200 µL pipette tip and cells were gently washed with 1X PBS. The ''wounded'' areas were photographed in specific wound sites (two sites for each wound) at 40x magnification using an Olympus IX51 inverted microscope equipped with an Olympus XM10 Digital Camera System every 12h until wound closure. The relative migration distance (5 measures by wound) was calculated with the following formula: relative migration distance (%) = (A-B)/C x100, where A is the width of cell wound at 0h incubation, B is the width of cell wound after specific hours of incubation, and C is the width mean of cell wound for 0h of incubation. For relative migration distance, the results were analyzed using the beWound-Cell Migration Tool (Version 1.5) (developed by A.H.J. Moreira, S. Queirós and J.L. Vilaça, Biomedical Engineering Solutions Research Group, Life and Health Sciences Research Institute- University of Minho; available at http://www. besurg.com/sites/default/files/beWoundApp.zip). At least three independent experiments were performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Wound Healing Assay with Metabolic Supplements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded (6-well plate) in complete RPMI-1640 medium at an optimal density, and were cultured to obtain at least 95% of confluence. Then, “wounds” were made by manual scratching, and cells were washed with 1× PBS and incubated with complete cell medium (RPMI-1640 medium or Eagle’s MEM) supplemented with lactate, CM, NAM, or CHC. The wound areas were photographed at regular time points using an Olympus IX51 inverted microscope equipped with an Olympus XM10 Digital Camera System. The relative migration distance was calculated using the following formula: relative migration distance (%) = (A − B)/C × 100, in which A is the width of cell wound at 0 h incubation, B is the width of cell wound after specific hours of incubation, and C is the mean width of cell wound for 0 h of incubation. For relative migration distance, the results were analyzed using the beWound—Cell Migration Tool (Version 1.5) [28 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!