The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using gen5 1

1

MIF Tautomerase Activity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MIF tautomerase assay was performed as previously described51 (link). Briefly, the enzymatic reaction was initiated at 25 °C by adding 20 μl of dopachrome methyl ester substrate (2 mM L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine methyl ester and 4 mM sodium periodate) in a 96-well plate that contained 200 μl of either (i) rmMIF (83.3 nM, R&D systems), (ii) rmMIF preincubated for 1 h at 37 °C with 10 µM ISO-1 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), (iii) Q586B2 (83,3 nM), (iv) Q586B2 preincubated for 1 h at 37 °C with 10 µM ISO-1, or (v) BSA. All dilutions were made in tautomerase assay buffer (50 mM potassium phosphate, 1 mM EDTA, pH 6.0). Activity was determined by the semicontinuous reduction in signal that was measured at OD475nm for 5 min. The percentage tautomerase activity was compared to that of rmMIF alone (set at 100% activity). ELISA plates were read by using an ELX808 Absorbance Microplate Reader (BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA) and Gen5 1.08 software (BioTek Instruments).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Resazurin Assay for Cell Viability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the Resazurin assay, 600 cells of A431 and 1200 cells of CAL-39 per well were seeded in 96-well plates (Corning Life Sciences) in Dulbecco’s Minimum Essential Medium w/o phenol-red (DMEM; Thermo Fisher Scientific). A greater quantity of CAL-39 cells was utilized to ensure that the color change occurred simultaneously in both cell lines, enabling a simultaneous execution of the assay. The treatment with G1 or G36 was carried out 24 h later. After incubation for 72 h, 20 µL Resazurin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was added to every well. Ten hours later, the relative reduction in Resazurin was measured at 570 nm and 630 nm using a multidetection microplate reader (BioTek Instruments) and analyzed using GEN5 1.08 software (BioTek Instruments). The relative reduction was calculated with Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cell Viability Assay via Electrotransfection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electrotransfection was performed as described above. After electroporation, samples were transferred into 96-well flat-bottomed plates and incubated for 10 min on ice, followed by the addition of growth media to the final 200 μL volume in each well. After 24 h, wells were washed twice with PBS, and to each well, 90 µL of PBS and 10 µL of cell viability reagent (PrestoBlue, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) were added. The cells were kept in an incubator for 2 h, and the fluorescence was measured using a Synergy 2 microplate reader and the Gen5 1.04.5 software (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). The excitation wavelength was 540/20 nm, and the emission was evaluated at 620/40 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating Reactive Oxygen Species in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For ROS evaluation, the cells in an electroporation medium were incubated with H2DCFDA (DCF) (Sigma-Aldrich, Chemie GmbH, Steinheim, Germany) dye at a concentration of 10 μM for 30 min. Afterward, 50 μL (4 × 106 cells/mL) of cell/dye suspension with or without AuNPs was placed into the electroporation cuvette and treated by PEF. After the treatment, the samples were transferred to a black 96-well plate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and incubated for an additional 20 min at room temperature. Then 100 μL of 97% ethanol was added to each sample, and the samples were incubated for another 10 min. Then DCF fluorescence measurements were performed using Synergy 2 microplate reader and Gen5 1.04.5 software (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Establishing Luciferase-Expressing Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HepG2 and Huh7 cells were transfected with a plasmid coding for the luciferase gene (pCDNA3.1-Luc) using the jetPEI® reagent (Polyplus-transfection®, Illkirch, France) according to the protocol of the manufacturer. The plasmid coding for the luciferase gene (pCDNA3.1-Luc) was donated by Dr J. Massagué (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA). Positive transfected cells were obtained subsequent to selection with the appropriate antibiotic, 450 µg/ml hygromycin. Once the clones had been isolated they were independently harvested by cloning rings, grown in multiwell plates and expanded. Hygromycin positive clones were tested for the presence of the luciferase gene by adding 150 µg/ml luciferin to the culture media, and then reading the luminescence in triplicate wells using a Synergy4 multi-mode microplate reader with Gen5 1.05 software (BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). Each clone was analyzed at least twice and one of them, HepG2-Luc#22, was chosen for further experiments. In addition, a previously published MCF7-lucifesase expressing clone was established as previously described (22 (link)) and analyzed in parallel as a positive control. The correct behavior of these clones in terms of general aspect, proliferation (measured as MTT metabolization) and cell cycle profile was determined before further proceeding.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cell Cycle Analysis by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry, ethanol-fixed cells were stained with 5 μg/ml propidium iodide (PI) and 250 μg DNase-free RNAse. A total of 50,000 cells were acquired in the PI gate by using a BD Accuri™ C6 flow cytometer and the C6 (version 1.0.264.21) software (BD Biosciences).
To measure bromodeoxyuridine (BrDU) incorporation, the Cell Proliferation ELISA, BrdU (colorimetric) kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) was used following the manufacturer's instructions. Data were acquired using a BioTek Synergy 4 reader with Gen5 1.05 software (both from BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

BEZ235 Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
K562/A were cultured as aforementioned and treated with 200 nM BEZ235 for 24 h. Total protein was extracted from K562/A cells using lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100; 150 mM NaCl; 2 mM EDTA; 50 mM Tris-HCl) supplemented with phosphatase inhibitor cocktail. Total protein concentration was measured using Gen5 1.0 software (BioTek Instruments, Inc.) on a spectrophotometer microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, Inc.). A total of 20–50 µg protein was separated by SDS-PAGE using 10–15% gels and transferred onto a PVDF membrane. Following blocking non-specific binding sites with 5% non-fat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline with 0.05% Tween-20 at room temperature for 60 min, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. Next, the membranes were probed with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5,000) for 60 min at 37°C. Subsequently, the immunoreactive membranes were developed using Pierce™ Electrochemiluminescent Western Bloting Substrate (cat. no. UC280185, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) on ImageQuant™ LAS 4000 (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) and the density was quantified and normalized to β-actin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Investigating Rapamycin and Doxorubicin Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cell proteins were extracted from K562 cells treated with rapamycin and/or doxorubicin using lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris-HCl) supplemented with phosphatase inhibitor cocktail. After protein concentration was measured by Gen5 1.0 software (BioTek Instruments, Inc.) on a spectrophotometer microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, Inc.), 20–40 µg protein was run on a 10–15% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gel and transferred to a polyvinylidinedifluoride membrane. Following blocking non-specific binding sites with 5% nonfat dry milk in tris-buffered saline with 0.05% Tween at 37°C for 60 min, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies against mTOR, p-mTOR, p70S6K, p-p70S6K, Bcl-2, Bax, Bcl-xL, CDK4, CDK6, Cyclin B1 and CyclinD1at 4°C overnight. Next, the membranes were probed with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5,000) for 60 min at 37°C. Subsequently, the immunoreactive membranes were developed using Pierce™ ECL Western Blotting Substrate (cat. no. 32109; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. cat. no.32109) on Luminescent Image Analyzer (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Band density was quantified and normalized to β-actinby Image J software (version 2; National Institutes of Health).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Serum Cortisol and Melatonin Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cortisol and melatonin were quantified from serum samples by ELISA (IBL, Hamburg, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Standard curve and analysis were performed with Gen5.10 Software (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Cellular Oxidative Stress via DCFDA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ROS formation was detected using a cell permeable fluorescent compound, 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFDA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction (ab113851, Abcam). In brief, mBECs were seeded on a 96 well plate (clear bottom/black microplates, Nunc 165305, Thermo Fisher) and grown to 80%–85% confluence. After treatment with unconditioned medium or MCCM, the mBECs were washed twice with assay buffer and stained with 20 μM of DCFDA in assay buffer for 45 min at 37°C. Following staining with DCFDA, the cells were washed twice with PBS and the fluorescence was read immediately at 485 nm excitation and 535 nm emission on a fluorescent plate reader (Synergy HT, Biotek, Winooski, VT, USA) with Gen5™ 1.0 software (Biotek). Changes in ROS were determined as fold change in fluorescence as compared to vehicle treated control. All analyses and calibrations were performed at least in triplicate (Ye et al., 2015 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!