The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Bond max automated staining system

Manufactured by Leica
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom

The Bond Max automated staining system is a laboratory instrument designed for the automated processing and staining of tissue samples. It performs routine and specialized immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) procedures. The Bond Max automates the entire staining process, including deparaffinization, antigen retrieval, primary antibody incubation, and detection, providing consistent and reliable results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using bond max automated staining system

1

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Xenograft Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MDA-MB231-Luc xenograft tumors harvested from vehicle and ZER treated mice were fixed with formalin and embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections were cut and deparafinized in xylene, and dehydrated in graded alcohol and hydrated in water. Tissue sections (4 μm) were subjected to immunohistochemical staining using Ki67 rabbit polyclonal (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), FN rabbit monoclonal (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and TGF-β1 rabbit polyclonal antibodies (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) by a Bond-Max automated staining system (Leica). The Ki67 positivity of cells was analyzed using a Scanscope XT from Aperio (Vista, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiplex Staining of Tumor Antigens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Multiplex staining of TAs, using anti-clathrin (Abcam, Cat. No. ab21679), anti-caveolin-1 (Abcam, Cat. No. ab2910) and EGFR (Leica, NCL-EGFR) antibodies on the same TA section, was conducted using Bond Max automated staining system (Leica, UK) (Arthurs et al., 2020; (link)Symes et al., 2013) (link). Each antibody was optimized for pH and concentration dependence, antigen retrieval and temperature parameters; nuclei were counterstained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Antibodies were used at a dilution of 1:2000, 1:4000 and 1:500 for anti-clathrin, anti-caveolin-1 and EGFR, on TAs and labelled with Opal-650 (red), Opal-520 (green) and Opal-570 (yellow), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of p53 in ESCC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical staining in human ESCC samples was performed by using standard reagents and techniques on a Bond-Max Automated Staining System (Leica Biosystems Newcastle Ltd, Australia). The sections were incubated with primary antibodies followed by Bond Polymer Refine detection system (DS9800, Leica Biosystems, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK). The primary antibody used was p53 (clone DO7, 1:200; Leica Biosystems, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK). Positive and negative controls were performed according to manufacturer’s instruction.. The staining assessment was independently carried out by 2 pathologists (S.L.W. and W.T.H) without any information about clinicopathologic features or prognosis. The p53 expression in the tissue was scored in terms of the percentage of cells that exhibited positive nuclear staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

ALI Histology and Immunohistochemistry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ALI were harvested on day 14, then fixed in formalin, paraffin-embedded and serially sectioned. Slides were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated thru a series of ethanol washes. Histology slides were stained in hematoxylin, rinsed, then stained in eosin (Azer Scientific) on a Shandon Gemini automated stainer (ThermoFisher). Immunohistochemistry slides were incubated with E1 (Leica Biosystems) immunohistochemistry antigen retrieval solution for 20min. Claudin-1 (1:50; LS Bio LS-C415827; 1hour primary incubation) and ZO-1 (1:50; Sigma HPA001636; 1hour primary incubation) antibodies were used for staining with Bond Refine polymer staining kit on the Bond-Max automated staining system (Leica Biosystems).
All stained slides were dehydrated in ascending ethanol and xylene washes before coverslipping with cytoseal (Fisher Scientific, USA). Stained slides were digitally scanned at 20x magnification on an Aperio CS-O slide scanner (Leica Biosystems). ALI membrane thickness, number of basolateral nuclei per 100 μm, percent dilated intracellular space and percent strong 3,3′-Diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining intensity were calculated using Aperio imaging software algorithms.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Automated Immunohistochemical Staining for HIF-1α

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Methods for tissue microarray construction were previously described (Eustace et al, 2013a (link)). Immunohistochemistry was carried out for CAIX and GLUT1 as per a previous protocol (Hoskin et al, 2003 (link)). HIF-1α staining was carried out using the Bond-Max Automated staining system (Leica Biosystems, Newcastle, UK). Samples were de-waxed and rehydrated, followed by antigen retrieval at pH 9.0 for 40 min at 100 °C. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked using 3% hydrogen peroxide solution. Primary antibody (mouse monoclonal HIF-1α, BD Biosciences 610959, Oxford, UK) was diluted to a 1 : 20 solution with diluent and incubated with samples for 15 min at room temperature. A negative control of IgG1 (Dako X0931, Cambridge, UK) was also used. Post-primary rabbit anti-mouse link reagent was applied (Bond Polymer Refine Detection System, Leica DS9800, Newcastle, UK), and samples were incubated for 8 min at room temperature. The anti-rabbit polymer-HRP detection reagent (Bond Polymer Refine Detection System, Leica) was then added and samples were incubated at room temperature for a further 8 min. 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride was added, and after a further 10 min of incubation samples were counterstained with haematoxylin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Staining of Porcine Muscle Fibers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded porcine sling and clasp muscle fibers were prepared for IHC staining. The IHC stains were performed using standard reagents and techniques on a BOND-MAX Automated Staining System (Leica Microsystems). Briefly, the deparaffinized and rehydrated sections were subjected to heat-induced antigen restoration with bond epitope retrieval solution 1 (citrate-based pH 6.0 solution, Leica Microsystems). The staining procedure involved a peroxidase block with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 5 min, incubation with a 1:300 dilution of rabbit neuromedin B receptor polyclonal antibody, LS-A825 (Lifespan Biosciences, Seattle, WA, USA) for BB1, a 1:300 dilution of rabbit GRPR polyclonal antibody (Abnova, Taipei, Taiwan) for BB2, or a 1:200 dilution of rabbit anti-Brs3/bombesin receptor 3 polyclonal antibody (Bioss, MA, USA) for BB3 for 30 min at room temperature. Then, the samples were subsequently incubated with an anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase polymer for 10 min at room temperature. The samples were then treated with a chromogen, 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB), for 10 min at room temperature and counterstained with hematoxylin for 5 min. The sling and clasp muscle sections were stained with normal rabbit IgG at equimolar concentrations as negative controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multiplex Immunofluorescence Analysis of Tumor Immune Landscape

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following deparaffinization and rehydration, heat induced antigen retrieval was performed using Tris-EDTA buffer pH 9. Tissues were stained for S100A9 (Novus Biologicals), CD33 (Novocastra), CD8, Neutrophil Elastase, and CD163 (Abcam). PD-1 antibody was obtained from R&D Systems. The following fluorescently conjugated secondary mAb (Life technologies) were used: anti-rabbit IgG AF594 for S100A9 and Neutrophil Elastase, anti-mouse IgG AF647 for CD33 and anti-mouse IgG AF594 for CD163. Alexa-594 donkey anti-mouse IgG was used for CD8 and Alexa-647 donkey anti-goat antibody for PD1. Cell nuclei were stained using DAPI (Life technologies). Images were obtained using Leica TCS SP5 Confocal microscope. 16 frames at 63X magnification were used to calculate the cell count/mm2.
IHC Staining was performed on a Bond Max automated staining system (Leica Microsystems). The Bond Refine polymer staining kit (Leica Microsystems) was used. FoxP3 mAb (Biolegend), CD4 mAb (Leica microsystems) and CD8 mAb (DAKO) were used and antigen retrieval was performed with ER2 and ER1 (Leica Microsystems) retrieval solutions. Slides were rinsed, dehydrated through a series of ascending concentrations of ethanol and xylene and then mounted. Images were obtained using Nikon E600 Upright Microscope. 12 frames at 40X magnification were used to calculate the cell count/mm2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Analysis of CD8+ T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumors were embedded in OCT and then sectioned in 5um slices, fixed in acetone, and stained using a Bond Max automated staining system (Leica Microsystems), with the Bond Intense R staining kit (Leica Microsystems), using CD8 primary antibody (clone 53-6.7, Abcam). H&E stains were performed according to manufacturer’s directions (Sigma). The histopathological scoring is detailed in Supplemental Information.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

SLFN11 Immunohistochemical Scoring Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SLFN11 immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis was performed by an outcomes-blinded central laboratory as previously described (34) using unstained, FFPE sections from patient tumor biopsies. After rehydration, a steamer (pH ¼ 9) was used for antigen retrieval, 3% hydrogen peroxide for quenching intrinsic peroxidase activity, and 5% goat serum for blocking. Sections were then incubated with SLFN11 primary antibody (HPA023030, Sigma-Aldrich). IHC staining was performed with a Bond Max automated staining system (Leica Microsystems Inc.) using previously optimized IHC parameters. A thoracic pathologist then scored each slide for tumor intensity and extent of expression (i.e., proportion, 0%-100%) of cells staining positively for SLFN11 and the overall intensity of SLFN11 staining (0-3þ). An H-score was calculated by multiplying extent and intensity of staining (range, 0-300) wherein an H-score ≥1 was considered positive, as previously validated (34) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!