The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spe confocal microscopy

Manufactured by Leica
Sourced in United States

The Leica SPE confocal microscopy system is a high-performance microscope designed for advanced imaging applications. It uses laser-scanning technology to produce high-resolution, three-dimensional images of samples. The Leica SPE offers exceptional optical performance and image quality, making it a valuable tool for researchers and scientists working in various fields.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using spe confocal microscopy

1

CE1 Cell Attachment and Proliferation on ACMFPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine cell attachment, the same number of retinoic acid-treated CE1 cells were seeded on the 90 μm ACMFP microfibers or flat PLGA membrane (control) for 4 hr. The samples were stained with H33342 for 20 min to label nuclei and visualized via Leica SPE confocal microscopy. Nuclei were counted utilizing the Cell Counter plugin of ImageJ software (n = 8 samples per group, 1–2 images were randomly selected per sample).
To characterize cell proliferation, retinoic acid-treated CE1 spheres were cultured on ACMFPs or control flat PLGA membrane and fixed as above. Anti-Ki67 (1:200; ThermoFisher) with Dylight 549 conjugated donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibodies were used to label proliferating cells. The samples were observed and imaged by Leica SPE confocal microscopy. The number of Ki67 positive cells was counted as above, and (Ki67 positive cells)/(DAPI positive cells) × 100% was calculated (n = 8 samples per group, 1–2 images were randomly selected per sample).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

LDL Uptake in LDLR Mutants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293 cells carrying WT or mutated LDLR gene were incubated with 10μg/ml Dil-LDL for 4 hours. The cells were washed three times and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Leica SPE confocal microscopy and ImageJ software were used to analyze the fluorescence signal in all the samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Subcellular Localization of Mutant LDLR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hep G2 cells stably expressing wild-type and mutant LDLR grown on glass coverslips were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma Aldrich, Shanghai, China), permeabilized with 0.1% Triton-X 100, and blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA). Mouse anti-FLAG antibody (M2 antibody, Sigma) and rabbit anti-Calnexin (CST) antibody incubations were carried out in 5% BSA at a dilution of 1:200. After incubation, we washed the cells five times with PBS, followed by incubation with Cy5 conjugated anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) and cyanine dye 3 (Cy3) conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA). After six final washes with PBS, coverslips were mounted in 60% glycerol. All samples were imaged using a Leica SPE confocal microscopy (Buffalo Grove, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Neurite Outgrowth Alignment Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To characterize the alignment of neurite outgrowths, retinoic acid-treated CE1 cells were cultured on fibers or control PLGA membrane and fixed as above. Anti-neurofilament (1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) with Dylight 649 conjugated donkey anti-mouse secondary antibodies were used to define neurites outgrowth. The samples were observed and imaged by Leica SPE confocal microscopy. The alignment value was used to determine the alignment of neurite outgrowth, which was determined by the angle between the neurite outgrowth (neurofilament positive neurites) and the microfibers. The linear measurement tool of the ImageJ software was used to determine the alignment value of neurofilament-positive cells (n = 12 samples per group, 8–10 neurons were randomly selected per sample; Supplemental Fig. S1a).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Labeling Proliferating Cells in AC Spheres

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tertiary AC spheres were treated with 5-ethynyl-2-deoxyuridine (EdU, 200 ng/mL, Sigma) for 48 h as previously reported [28 (link),29 (link),34 (link)]. The spheres were fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 10 min, followed by incubation in Click-iT reaction buffer, CuSO4, Alexa Fluor 555, and reaction buffer additive (Invitrogen) for 30 min. All nuclei were labeled with Hoechst 33342 (nuclei marker). The sphere samples were observed and imaged using Leica SPE confocal microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Neural Lineage Differentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To characterize differentiation, retinoic acid-treated CE1 cells were cultured on either ACMFP fibers or flat PLGA membrane (control) for 6 days as described above. Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, blocked with donkey serum in 0.5% Triton X-100 for 30 min, incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight followed by secondary antibody treatment at room temperature for 2 hr. Primary antibodies used in this study included: Anti-Sox2 (1:200; Abcam), Anti-Nestin (1:200; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), Anti-TUJ1 (1:500; AVES), Anti-GFAP (1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and Anti-MOG (1:200; Millipore) antibodies. Secondary antibodies included Dylight 549 or Dylight 649 conjugated donkey anti-mouse, rabbit or chicken antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch). 4,6-Diamidino-2-Phenylindole (DAPI; 1:500; Invitrogen) was used to label all nuclei. Samples were observed and imaged by Leica SPE confocal microscopy and/or Leica DMI 3000B epifluorescence microscopy. Cells cultured on coverslips serve as controls. The number of Sox2 and Nestin-positive cells, TUJ1 positive cells, GFAP positive cells and MOG positive cells were quantified via the Cell Counter plugin of the ImageJ software), and (Sox2 and Nestin double-labeled cells)/(DAPI positive cells) × 100% were calculated (n = 12 samples per group, 1–2 images were randomly selected per sample).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunofluorescence Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde, cell samples were treated with PBS containing 5% donkey serum (Jackson ImmunoResearch) and 0.2% Triton X-100 (Sigma) for 30 min at room temperature. Samples were incubated in primary antibodies at 4°C overnight, followed by corresponding secondary antibodies incubation at room temperature for 2 hr. Primary and secondary antibodies are listed in Tables S4 and S5. DAPI (Invitrogen) was used to label all nuclei. Samples were observed and imaged by Leica 3000B epifluorescence microscopy and/or Leica SPE confocal microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunofluorescence of CD41+ Cells with Inhibitors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescence was performed on CD41+ cells cultured with or without inhibitors4 (link). In brief, cells were allowed to adhere on poly-l-lysine-coated slides for 1 h at 37 °C, fixed in 4% PFA, permeabilized with 0.2% of Triton, and blocked with 1% BSA before antibody labeling. Cells were examined under a Leica-SpE confocal microscopy with ×63/1.4NA oil objective. The following antibodies were used: mouse anti-ac-tubulin (1:300, Sigma T7451), mouse anti-Tubulin (1:100, Sigma T5293), rabbit anti-HDAC6 (1:100, Cell Signaling 7558), and rabbit anti-Cortactin (1:100, Millipore 05-180). FITC-conjugated phalloidin (1:500, Sigma P5282) was used to stain actin cytoskeleton, mouse anti-CD63 (1:100, Sigma SAB4700215, clone MEM 259), and rabbit anti-VWF (1:1000, Dako A0082). Appropriate secondary antibodies conjugated with Alexa 488, Alexa 546, or Alexa 633 (Molecular Probes) were used. DAPI (Molecular Probes) was applied for nucleus staining. Three-dimensional image analyses were performed with Zeiss Image Examiner software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunofluorescence and Western Blotting Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde, cell samples were treated with PBS containing 5% donkey serum and 0.2% Triton-X100 for 20–30 min at room temperature. Samples were incubated in the primary antibody at 4 °C overnight, followed by corresponding secondary antibody incubation at room temperature for 2 hr. Secondary antibodies included AMCA, Alexa Fluor 488, Cy3, and Alexa Fluor 647 conjugated donkey anti-mouse, goat, rabbit, or chicken antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch). 4,6-Diamidino-2-Phenylindole (DAPI; Invitrogen) was used to label all nuclei. Samples were observed and imaged by Leica 3000B epifluorescence microscopy and/or Leica SPE confocal microscopy.
For western blotting, purified TSP1 protein, ACM collected from wild type Swiss Webster mice, TSP1-ID-ACM, mock-ID-ACM, TSP1-KO-ACM, and DMEM/F12 were loaded to blotting gels. Antibodies used in western blotting included goat anti-TSP1 antibodies, donkey anti-goat HRP-conjugated antibodies, and HRP standard protein (all from Bio-Rad). SuperSignal West Femto Stable Peroxide Solution and SuperSignal West Femto Luminol/Enhancer Solution (ECL, all from Thermo scientific) were applied to blotting membrane for protein detection. Images were captured using a ChemiDoc-It 2 imaging system (UVP).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Cellular Uptake of DiI-LDL

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We incubated Hep G2 cells with 10 μg/ml DiI-LDL in medium for 2 h. After incubation, we washed the cells three times with DPBS+ 0.3% BSA and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma Aldrich). We analyzed all samples using the Leica SPE confocal microscopy and analyzed the fluorescence signal using ImageJ software (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!