The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Jem 1400 series 120 kv transmission electron microscope

Manufactured by JEOL
Sourced in Japan

The JEM-1400 series is a 120 kV Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) manufactured by JEOL. The core function of this TEM is to provide high-resolution imaging and analysis of samples at the nanoscale level.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using jem 1400 series 120 kv transmission electron microscope

1

Microscopic Examination of Fungal Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Germination of conidia was examined with a Nikon Optiphot 2 Microscope (Tokyo, Japan). Lipid bodies within fungal cells were stained with 2.5 μg/mL Nile red (Sigma-Aldrich) solution for 20 min at room temperature and examined by a ZOE Fluorescent Cell Imager (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) microscope equipped with the 530-nm excitation and 635-nm emission wavelength filters. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed using a JEOL JEM-1400 series 120 kV Transmission Electron Microscope (Jeol, Tokyo, Japan). Samples were treated with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) and 1% osmium tetraoxide, and immersed in LR White Resin after being dehydrated with an ethanol series. Samples were cut to thin slices, stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and examined. Photographs were taken with an Gatan Orius SC 1000B bottom mounted CCD-camera (Gatan Inc., Pleasanton, CA, USA). For penetration studies, leaf samples inoculated with fungal strains were sectioned to thin slices by hand using a sharp razor blade, stained with lactophenol cotton blue (Sigma-Aldrich), and examined by light microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transmission Electron Microscopy for MDV Visualization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed to observe MDV formation. Brain tissues were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Sigma) in phosphate buffer overnight at 4 °C. Next, the samples were fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 2 h, dehydrated with a graded series of acetone washes, infiltrated with propylene epoxide, and embedded in Epon 618. After sample preparation, 90–100-nm-thick sections were mounted onto a 200-mesh copper grid and imaged with a JEM-1400 series 120 kV transmission electron microscope (JEOL, Japan) with an integrated high-sensitivity complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fluorescent Microscopy Techniques for Fungal Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescence was examined by a ZOE Fluorescent Cell Imager (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, United States) microscope equipped with specific wavelength filters. Red fluorescence from mCherry was visualized using 543 nm excitation and 560–615 nm emission. Red fluorescence after staining with 1 μg/ml MM 4–64 (Enzo, New York, NY, United States) for 30 min was observed using 588 nm excitation and 734 nm emission to track endocytosis. Green fluorescence in hyphae after staining with 40 μM 2'-7'-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFHDA, Sigma-Aldrich) was examined using 504 nm excitation and 529 nm emission. Blue fluorescence in hyphae after staining with 100 μM monodansylcadaverine (MDC, Sigma-Aldrich) was examined using 335 nm excitation and 518 nm emission to identify autophagosomes, amphisomes, and autolysosomes. Fluorescence after staining with 20μM CellTracker Blue CMAC Dye (Molecular Probes C2110, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) was visualized using 353 nm excitation and 466 nm emission to detect the vacuoles. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a JEOL JEM-1400 series 120 kV Transmission Electron Microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) was conducted to examine hyphae/conidia, which were soaked in 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 1% osmium tetraoxide, embedded in LR White Resin, sliced, and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cryogenic Nanobubble Visualization in Xylem Sap

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nanoparticles in xylem sap from C. avellana extracted with the method described above in June 2016, were visualised based on Papahadjopoulos-Sternberg (2010).
Fresh sap was quenched using the sandwich technique and frozen with nitrogen-cooled propane, which avoided ice crystal formation and potential artefacts during the cryofixation process. The cryofixed sample was mounted on a standard Bal-Tec double replica holder, and inserted in a BAF 300 freeze-etching device (Balzers, Liechtenstein; Walther, 2003) . The temperature in this device was raised to -120°C, and the vacuum was ca. 2 x 10 -7 mbar. Fracturing was done by opening the double replica holder. The fractures were then coated with Pt for 30 s at an angle of ca. 30°. A second coating was done with carbon for 30 s at an angle of 0° (2kV per 60-70mA, 1x10 -5 Torr). Unlike Schenk et al. (2017) , the replicas were not cleaned by fuming concentrated HNO 3 over the samples. The cleaning step may allow more detailed observations of the lipid coating, but was not required for the identification of nanobubbles. Two samples of xylem sap were prepared, and pure water was taken as a control sample. Observation was done with a JEOL JEM-1400 series 120kV Transmission Electron Microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transmission Electron Microscopy of CiLV-C Virus-Like Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Carbon-coated copper negative stain grids were glow-discharged for 30 s (easiGlow) before adding 10-μl samples of total protein, incubating for 2 min and blotting away excess liquid. The grids were washed twice in Milli-Q water before applying two lots of 10 μl 2% (w/v) uranyl acetate, leaving the stain for 30 s each time before blotting. The grids were air dried and analyzed on a JEOL JEM-1400 series 120kV Transmission Electron Microscope. The size of the CiLV-C VLPs was determined analyzing three images at different magnifications (60,000×, 80,000× and 100,000×) and measuring the diameter of 100 particles from five random fields (20 particles/field) in each image. The diameter of the 300 particles in total was presented as a frequency–size distribution histogram and the polydispersity index (PDI) was calculated as follows:
PDI = (standard deviation / mean diameter size)2
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!