The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Stata intercooled version 12

Manufactured by StataCorp
Sourced in United States

STATA intercooled version 12.1 is a data analysis and statistical software package developed by StataCorp. It is designed to help users manage, analyze, and visualize data. The software includes a wide range of tools for data manipulation, regression analysis, and hypothesis testing, among other features.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

11 protocols using stata intercooled version 12

1

Statistical Analysis of Clinical Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using STATA intercooled version 12.1. Quantitative data are represented as the mean and standard deviation. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test to compare the means of two groups and paired t-tests to compare data at different time intervals to the preoperative data. Qualitative data are presented as the number and percentage and compared using the chi-squared test. Graphs were produced using Excel or STATA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using STATA intercooled version 12.1. Quantitative data were represented as mean, standard deviation, median, and range. Data were analyzed using Student's t-test to compare means of two. When the data were not normally distributed, the Mann-Whitney test was used to compare two groups. Qualitative data were presented as number and percentage and compared using the Chi square test. Correlation between different variable was done by using Spearman's rank correlation test. P value was considered significant if it was less than 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Eye Parameter Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data was analyzed using STATA intercooled version 12.1. Quantitative data was represented as mean and standard deviation. Data was analyzed using Student's t-test to compare the means of two groups. Qualitative data was presented as a number and percentage and compared using chi-square test. Multivariate regression analyses were done to determine different eye parameters. P value was considered significant if it was less than 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Trends in Sex Partner Meeting Places

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For descriptive analyses and hypothesis testing, all analyses were performed using Stata (Stata Intercooled, version 12.1, Stata Corp. LP, College Station, TX) and all statistical tests with p-values of < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Individuals reporting a sex partner meeting place were compared to those not reporting using chi-squared tests or t-tests, as appropriate. Summary statistics were generated to describe the frequency of report of sex partner meeting types over the study time period by unique venue report and by frequency of report in six-month intervals. We also compared the top five sex partner meeting places in the past five years and in the past year among the two most frequently reported types (bars/clubs and internet-based sites) and calculated the percent of reports these five places yielded as potentially stable sites for control strategies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Clinical Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Both clinical, laboratory and radiological data were analyzed using STATA intercooled version 12.1. Quantitative data were analyzed, using student t-test to compare means of two groups. When the data was not normally distributed Mann-Whitney test was used. Qualitative data were compared using Chi square test. P value was considered significant if it was less than 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comparative Analysis of Treatment Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data was analyzed by STATA intercooled version 12.1 using descriptive statistics and Independent-samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi square, and Fisher’s exact test. Graphs were produced by using Excel or STATA program. P value was considered significant if it was less than 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Analyzing Endocrine Disorder Risk Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using STATA intercooled version 12.1. Quantitative data were represented as mean, standard deviation, median, and range. Data were analyzed using a Mann–Whitney test as the distribution was not normal. Qualitative data were presented as number and percentage and compared using either a chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. A binary logistic regression model was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI), and P value of the risk factors of endocrine disorders. Results were considered significant at P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluating Disclosure Intervention Effectiveness

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transcripts were independently coded, reviewed by a second investigator, and coding disagreements resolved through discussion. Interview transcripts were analyzed using an inductive approach combining grounded theory and framework analysis.39 –41 The goal of analysis was to understand whether the intervention was successful in breaking down barriers to disclosure and effective in influencing children's behavior, and to clarify the intervention's most important “active ingredients.”42 (link)
Atlas.ti v.7 (Scientific Software Development GmbH, Berlin, Germany) was used to support coding, analysis, and data management. HCW self-efficacy surveys were analyzed using STATA Intercooled version 12 (StataCorp LP; College Station, TX) T-tests were used to compare HCW self-identified levels of confidence performing disclosure-related procedures between HCWs who had and had not received the formal Namibian training in the disclosure intervention.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Pediatric Drug Registration and Classification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The presence of the prescribed medicine on the WHO Children’s Medicines List was ascertained. Registration of the prescribed medicine for paediatric use by the Food and Drugs Authority (FDA) Ghana was also determined. The anatomical and therapeutic chemical (ATC) classification by the WHO [7 ] was also identified. Descriptive statistics of the data are presented using Stata intercooled version 12 (Stata Corp LP, College Station, TX, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Predicting 30-Day Hospital Readmission

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stata Intercooled, Version 12 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX) was used for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics comparing patients with and without 30-day readmission was analyzed by 2-sided Student’s t tests and χ2 tests for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. When necessary, the Fischer exact test and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney rank sum test were used for small cell counts with fewer than 10 observations. Multivariable parametric binary logistic regression models were constructed to test the association of combined predictors with readmission within 30 days. Risk factors from the univariate analysis with P < .1 and cell counts greater than 20 observations each were included into the multivariate regression model. Variables that would result in absolute readmission (ie, reoperation, sepsis, pulmonary embolism, etc) were excluded from final multivariable analysis. A forward and backward stepwise regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors associated with 30-day readmission. Odds ratios (ORs) are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The likelihood ratio (LR) test was implemented to compare the goodness of fit between final logistic regression models.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!