The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Db wax column

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States, Japan, Germany

The DB-WAX column is a capillary gas chromatography column designed for the separation and analysis of polar compounds. It features a polyethylene glycol stationary phase that provides excellent peak shape and resolution for a wide range of analytes, including alcohols, organic acids, and other polar molecules.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

169 protocols using db wax column

1

Fatty Acid Extraction and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extraction of fatty acids was performed as previously described [30 (link)]. Firstly, 2 g of frozen tissue powder was mixed with 15 ml of n-hexane:isopropanol (3:2, v/v) and 7.5 ml of 6.7% Na2SO4, followed by centrifugation for 10 minutes. The supernatant was evaporated to dryness with nitrogen. Methanol:toluene:H2SO4 (88:10:2, v/v/v) was added to produce fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs). After cooling, 1 ml of heptane with 0.5 g anhydrous Na2SO4 was added for FAME extraction. To detect fatty acids, an Agilent 6890 N gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector and a DB-WAX column (0.25 mm, 30 m, 0.25  m; J & W Scientific) was used. The injector and detector temperatures were 230°C. The initial oven temperature was 50°C, increased to 200°C at 25°C min−1, then increased to 230°C at 3°C min−1. Nitrogen was used as the carrier gas at 1 ml min−1. Exogenous heptadecanoic acid was added as internal standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Enzyme Kinetics Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Enzyme assays were carried out using previously published protocols (Ringer et al. 2003 (link), 2005 (link); Davis et al. 2005 (link)). Substrates and products for the assays were part of our chemical library. Kinetic assays of PulR were performed with 25 µg of purified, recombinant protein in phosphate-citrate buffer (pH 6), in the presence of 1 mM NADPH and with varying substrate concentration. The total volume of the assay was 200 µl. To speed up the detection of substrates and products, conditions for GC-FID (6890N, Agilent Technologies) using a DB-WAX column (60 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm; J&W Scientific) were modified as follows: front inlet and detector temperature 270°C, inlet mode splitless, injection volume 1 µl, carrier gas flow (He) 0.9 ml/min; initial oven temperature 85°C (hold for 4 min), then linear gradient to 130°C at 30°C/min (hold for 3 min), and a second linear gradient to 235°C at 20°C/min (hold for 10 min). Quantitation was achieved in the ChemStation B.03.02 software (Agilent Technologies) based upon calibration curves with known amounts of authentic standards and normalization to the sample weight and peak area of the internal standard (camphor). Prism 8 software (GraphPad) was used to calculate kinetic values from assay data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fatty Acid Profiling via GC-FID

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Culture volumes corresponding to 50 mg biomass were sampled on ice, centrifuged (10,000 g, 10 min at 4°C), washed twice, resuspended in 5 ml ice-cold water and stored at -20°C. Lipid extraction was performed as described previously 85 (link). Aliquots of 0.15 mL were added to 15 mL tubes and 1.5 mL of a mixture of concentrated HCl and 1-propanol (1:4) and 1.5 mL of dichlorethane were added. 400 μg of myristic acid (a 15:0 fatty acid) was included as internal standard. Samples were incubated at 100°C for 2 h. Subsequently, 3 mL of water was added to cooled samples. 1 mL of the organic phase was filtered over water-free sodium sulfate into GC vials. The fatty acid propyl esters in the organic phase were analyzed by gas chromatography (model 6890N, Agilent, U.S.A.) using a DB-wax column (length, 30 m; inside diameter, 0.25 mm; film thickness, 0.25 μm; J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA) and helium as the carrier gas. The sample volume was 1 μL, and the split was set to 1:20. The injection temperature was 230°C, and the following temperature gradient was used: 120°C at the start, increasing at a rate of 10°C/min up to 240°C, and then 240°C for 8 min. The fatty acid propyl esters were detected using a flame ionization detector at 250°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

GC-MS Analysis of Essential Oils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GC–MS was performed with a Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010 (Kyoto, Japan). GC columns used included a Rtx-5 column (5% diphenyl-dimethyl-polysiloxane, 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.1 μm film thickness, Restek, Bellefonte, PA, USA), and a DB-wax column (polyethylene glycol, 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm film thickness, J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA). Helium was used as the carrier gas with a constant flow rate of 1.0 mL/min on both columns. A scan range of m/z 45–400 and a solvent delay of 5 min were used with splitless injections of 1.0 µL for 1 min. The ion source was set to 230 °C, and the transfer line temperature to 250 °C. The oven temperature program was 40 °C, held for 1 min then ramped at 7 °C/min to 250 °C and held for 10 min. Retention indices (RI) were calculated on both columns using the same linear gradient method with comparison to an n-hydrocarbon mixture (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA, p/n 46827-U). The main peaks in the total ion chromatogram of each oil were then integrated using the MS software, and the relative percentage abundance of peaks was determined.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Volatile Analysis of Flowers and Butterflies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Separation and identification of the flower and butterfly volatiles were made by GC-MS using a Varian 3400 gas chromatograph (GC) (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) coupled with a Finnigan SSQ 7000 mass spectrometer (MS) (Thermo-Finnigan, San Jose, CA, USA). A DB-WAX column (length 30 m, inner diameter 0.25 mm, and film thickness 0.25 μm; J & W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA). The temperature programme started isothermal at 40 °C for 1 min, then was increased 5 °C/min to 220 °C and afterwards was held isothermal for 10 min. The injector temperature was kept isothermal at 225 °C and helium was used as the carrier gas at 69 kPa. The mass spectrometer was operated with full scan mode (mass range m/z 30–400 m/z) and mass spectra were obtained at 70 eV with the ion source at 150 °C. Identification of the compounds was made by comparison of their retention times and mass spectra with those of authentic reference standards as well as by comparing mass spectral data of natural products with those available from NIST mass spectral data base, version 2.0 (National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Analysis of Baijiu Flavors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As described previously [19 (link)], an Agilent (Santa Clara, CA, USA) 6890N gas chromatograph, fitted with a flame ionization detector, was employed to identify and quantify the major sweet compounds isolated (Tables S4 and S5). Baijiu samples (1 μL) with internal standard (IS5: amyl acetate, 174.24 mg·L−1) added were directly injected into the gas chromatograph in split mode (split ratio = 10:1). Nitrogen was used as the carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 2 mL/min, and a DB-Wax column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 μm film thickness, J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA) was used for separation. The column temperature was programmed as follows: initially 35 °C for 2 min; increased to 70 °C at 3.5 °C/min; increased to 180 °C at 5 °C/min; increased to 10 °C/min to 200 °C and held for 5 min. The injector and detector temperatures were set at 250 °C. A calibration curve was established for each standard compound, by injecting a dilution series, prepared in 50% (v/v) aqueous ethanol and diluted stepwise in a 1:1 ratio. All samples were tested in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

GC-MS Analysis of α-Dicarbonyl Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A GCMS system (GC-HRT 4D+, LECO Pegasus, US) equipped with a DB-Wax column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm, J &W Scientific, US) was adopted to separate the α-dicarbonyl compounds. Helium and nitrogen were used as the carrier gas (1.5 mL/min) and make-up gas (5 mL/min), respectively. The spitless injection mode was chosen at 250℃. The oven program was set as follows: the initial temperature was set to 40℃ and maintained for 2 min. The oven temperature was then raised to 230℃ at 20℃/min followed by maintaining the temperature for 6 min at 230℃ until the end of analysis. The GCMS transfer line temperature was 250℃. Electron-impact mass spectra were generated at 70 eV in an m/z scan range from 40 to 500. The mass spectrum source temperature was 210℃. The derivatized compounds were identified and compared their spectra with that in an MS library (mainlib NIST2014).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Analysis of Fermented Grains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ten grams of fermented grains were mixed with 90 mL of distilled water and ultrasonically treated at 0°C for 30 min. The suspension was centrifuged at 2,000 g for 5 min, and the supernatant was pipetted to analyzed the contents of reducing sugar and ethanol. Reducing sugar was analyzed using DNS method (Miller, 1959 (link)). Ethanol content analysis was carried out on an Agilent 7820A GC system equipped with a DB-Wax column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm, J&W Scientific, CA, United States). The oven temperature was held at 60°C for 5 min and then raised to 230°C at a rate of 10°C min–1 before being held at 230°C for 5 min. The carrier gas was helium with a flow-rate of 1 mL min–1. Ethanol contents were quantified by comparing the peak areas with authentic standards. Water content in the fermented grains was measured by drying the samples at 105°C for 24 h. The sampling site temperatures were measured using a thermometer at the time of sampling. Acidity and starch content were assayed using the method described by Wu et al. (2013) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Volatile Metabolite Profiling by HS-SPME-GC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Volatile metabolites were determined by a headspace solid-phase microextraction combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) (GC 6890N and MS 5975; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara) on a DB-Wax column (30 m × 0.25 mm inner diameter, 0.25-μm film thickness; J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA), based on the methods described in previous studies (58 (link), 59 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

GC-MS Analysis of Long-Chain Fatty Acid Esters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The instruments used in this research were Agilent Technologies 7890B GC System and Agilent Technologies 5977A MSD.
Each sample (1 μL) was injected in a splitless mode and analyzed on a DB-WAX column (60 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 μm film thickness, J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA), respectively, for a cross-check of their RIs. Helium was used as the carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 1.5 mL/min. The injector temperature was 250 °C. The temperature program of the oven was as follows: the oven temperature was held at 40 °C at first, then raised to 200 °C at a rate of 30 °C/min and held for 2 min, then raised at 2 °C/min up to 240 °C and held for 10 min. The MS was operated in an electron ionization (EI) mode at 70 eV. The activation voltage was 1.5 V. The solvent delay was 4–8 min. The temperatures of the interface and the ion source were set at 250 and 230 °C, respectively. The identification of LCFAEEs was conducted in full scan mode. The mass range was set from 45 to 350 amu. The quantification of LCFAEEs was performed in selected-ion-scan mode (SIM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!