The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Guava 8ht flow cytometer

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States, Morocco

The Guava 8HT flow cytometer is a compact, benchtop instrument designed for multiparameter cell analysis. It utilizes flow cytometry technology to measure and analyze various cellular characteristics, such as size, granularity, and fluorescence intensity. The Guava 8HT is capable of detecting up to 8 fluorescent parameters simultaneously, providing researchers with a versatile tool for a wide range of applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using guava 8ht flow cytometer

1

Lymph Node Immunophenotyping by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following extracellular, anti-human monoclonal antibodies were used for lymph node immunophenotyping: anti-CD3 PE-Cy 7, anti-CD8+PE-Cy 5, anti-CD4 FITC, anti-CD62L PE-Cy 5, anti-CD69 FITC, anti-CD152 (CTLA-4) PE, anti-CD11c PE-Cy 5, anti-CD86 PE-Cy 7, anti-HLA-DR PE, anti-CD3 FITC, anti-CD14 FITC, anti-CD16 FITC, anti-CD19 FITC, anti-CD123 PE-Cy 7, anti-CD141 PE, anti-CD68 PE-Cy 5, anti-CD20 PE, anti-CD56 PE, anti-CD279 (PD-1) APC, anti-CD11b PE, anti-CD64 FITC (BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA).
The human monoclonal antibodies, anti-CD4 PE-Cy 5 and anti-CD25 PE, were purchased from Biolegend (San Diego, CA) and used in conjunction with intracellular staining with anti-FoxP3 FITC for the quantification of regulatory T cells. Cell death was determined by propidium iodine staining (eBioscience, San Diego, CA USA). Four-color flow cytometry was performed on a Guava 8HT flow cytometer (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA USA) capturing 25,000 events for all samples. Results were analyzed using Guava Soft Incyte (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiplex miRNA Profiling in Cardiovascular Health

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The multiplex miRNA assay was carried out using FirePlex® particle technology (ABCAM, Cambridge, MA). The FirePlex® cardiology panel profiles 65 miRNAs differentially regulated in normal or abnormal cardiovascular health. Briefly, 40 μL plasma sample was prepared by mixing with Digest Buffer and Protease Mix to a final volume of 80 μL and then incubated at 60 °C for 45 min. In a 96-well filter plate, 25 μL of the prepared sample was incubated with 35 μL FirePlex Particles and 25 μL of hybridization buffer at 37 °C for 60 min. After rinsing to remove unbound RNA, 75 μL of labeling buffer was added to each well, and the plate was incubated for 60 min at room temperature. Adapted-modified miRNAs were eluted using 95 °C water and collected for PCR amplification using a PCR master mix. PCR product was then hybridized with hybridization buffer at 37 °C for 30 min. Particles were then rinsed and scanned using an EMD Millipore Guava 8HT flow cytometer. Raw output was background subtracted, normalized using the geometric mean of the three normalizer miRNAs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Plasma miRNA Profiling of Cardiovascular Health

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sodium citrate plasma samples were stored at −80 °C until assayed. The FirePlex® cardiology panel (ABCAM, Cambridge, MA, USA) was employed to measure the plasma levels of 65 miRNAs which have been associated with cardiovascular health. The method has been described previously [24 (link)]. Briefly, 40 μL plasma sample was mixed with Digest Buffer and Protease Mix to a final volume of 80 μL and then incubated at 60 °C for 45 min. A reaction mixture (25 μL of the prepared sample + 35 μL FirePlex Particles + 25 μL of hybridization buffer) was incubated at 37 °C for 60 min in a 96-well plate. After rinsing to remove unbound RNA, 75 μL of labeling buffer was added to each well and incubated for 60 min at room temperature. Adapted-modified miRNAs were eluted using 95 °C water and collected for PCR amplification using a PCR master mix. PCR product was then hybridized with hybridization buffer at 37 °C for 30 min. Particles were then rinsed and scanned on an EMD Millipore Guava 8HT flow cytometer. Raw output was background subtracted, normalized using the geometric mean of three normalizer miRNAs (miR-15b-5p, miR-17-5p, and miR-93-5p).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Urine miRNA Profiling via uEVs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A panel of 68 miRNAs (listed in Table S1) was used for profiling 40 μL of urine or 15 μL of RNA samples of uEVs isolated by the different methods. For each sample run, Firefly Particles (35 μL) were added to a well of a 96-well filter plate and filtered. Next, 25 μL of Hybe Buffer and 25 μL of sample was added to each well. The plate was incubated at 37 °C for 60 min with shaking. After rinsing, 75 μL of 1× Labeling Buffer was added to each well. The plate was incubated at room temperature for 60 min with shaking. After additional rinses, 65 μL of 95 °C RNAse-free water was added twice to each well to elute the ligated sample. Thirty microliters of this meltoff was mixed with 20 μL PCR master mix. The mixture underwent 27 cycles of PCR amplification followed by six cycles of asymmetric amplification. Next, 60 μL of Hybe Buffer was added back to each well of the original particles, followed by 20 μL of the PCR product, and the plate was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min with shaking. After rinsing, 75 μL of 1× Reporting Buffer was added to each well, and the plate incubated at room temperature for 15 min with shaking. After final rinses, 175 μL of Run Buffer was added to each well. Particles were scanned on an EMD Millipore Guava 8HT flow cytometer. Raw output was background subtracted and subsequently employed in statistical calculations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Circulating miRNA Profiling in Metabolic Disorders

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eighty-eight miRNA candidates were generated from a PubMed literature
review with search terms including “miRNA” and “Type I and
Type 2 diabetes, GDM, preeclampsia, adipogenesis, obesity, and nonalcoholic
fatty liver disease” 13 (link),
18 (link)–33 (link)
(Supplemental Table 1). Individual
candidate miRNA abundance was measured via Multiplex Circulating miRNA assay
(Abcam, FirePlex, Cambridge, MA). Samples were digested and hybridized to miRNA
specific hydrogel particles with a universal biotinylated adapter labeled with a
fluorescent reporter, and quantified with EMD Millipore Guava 8HT flow
cytometer. Positive and negative controls were included to reduce inter-plate
and inter-well variability. MiRNA spike-in target probes measured hybridization
success. Blank hydrogel particles were run to define background fluorescence.
Abcam FirePlex Analysis Workbench software was used for data analysis (https://www.abcam.com/kits/multiplex-immunoassays-firefly-analysis-workbench-software).
Normalization was performed via geNorm algorithm using the three most stable
miRNAs across all samples (hsa-let-7d-5p, hsa-mir-107, and hsa-mir-342-3p)
34 35 . Data was log converted to
eliminate directional bias. Geometric mean and fold changes were calculated for
each miRNA based on normalized expression data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Circulating miRNA Profiling in Metabolic Disorders

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eighty-eight miRNA candidates were generated from a PubMed literature
review with search terms including “miRNA” and “Type I and
Type 2 diabetes, GDM, preeclampsia, adipogenesis, obesity, and nonalcoholic
fatty liver disease” 13 (link),
18 (link)–33 (link)
(Supplemental Table 1). Individual
candidate miRNA abundance was measured via Multiplex Circulating miRNA assay
(Abcam, FirePlex, Cambridge, MA). Samples were digested and hybridized to miRNA
specific hydrogel particles with a universal biotinylated adapter labeled with a
fluorescent reporter, and quantified with EMD Millipore Guava 8HT flow
cytometer. Positive and negative controls were included to reduce inter-plate
and inter-well variability. MiRNA spike-in target probes measured hybridization
success. Blank hydrogel particles were run to define background fluorescence.
Abcam FirePlex Analysis Workbench software was used for data analysis (https://www.abcam.com/kits/multiplex-immunoassays-firefly-analysis-workbench-software).
Normalization was performed via geNorm algorithm using the three most stable
miRNAs across all samples (hsa-let-7d-5p, hsa-mir-107, and hsa-mir-342-3p)
34 35 . Data was log converted to
eliminate directional bias. Geometric mean and fold changes were calculated for
each miRNA based on normalized expression data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multiplexed miRNA Profiling Using Firefly Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A panel of 16 differentially expressed miRNAs with moderate to high expression (miR-10b-5p, miR-194-5p, miR-223-3p, miR-132-3p, miR-144-5p, miR-148a-3p, miR-486-5p, miR-363-3p, miR-199a-5p, miR-16-2-3p, miR-142-3p, miR-34c-5p, miR-129-5p, miR-433-3p, miR-885-5p, miR-346) and six stably expressed miRNAs in sequencing (miR-9-5p, miR-92a-3p, miR-98-5p, miR-101-3p, miR-151a-3p, miR-338-3p) was used for validation. In a 96-well filter plate, Firefly Multimix (Firefly BioWorks, www.fireflybio.com) was incubated with 25ul Hybridization Buffer and 25ul total RNA at a concentration of 1 ng/ul at 37°C for 60 minutes. After rinsing to removing unbound RNA, 75ul of Labeling Buffer was added to each well, and the plate was incubated for 60 minutes at room temperature. Adapted-modified miRNAs were released from the particles using 90°C water, and PCR amplified using a fluorescently-label primer set. PCR product was hybridized to fresh Firefly Multimix for 30 minutes at 37°C and re-suspended in Run Buffer for readout. Particles were scanned on an EMD Millipore Guava 8HT flow cytometer. Raw output was background subtracted, normalized using the geometric mean of the six normalizer miRNAs and log-transformed. LIMMA version 3.20.8 [54 ] was used to calculate significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Endothelial Activation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPAEC grown in 6 well plates were exposed to the un-concentrated conditioned media mixed with EGM2-MV (1:1) for 72 h; media were changed to EBM2 1 h prior to the beginning of the experiment. 4 h after TNFα/vehicle control stimulation, cells were harvested and incubated with fluorescently labeled IgG against CD54/ICAM-1 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA), CD62E/E-selectin (Biolegend, San Diego, CA), and CD106/VCAM (BD) on ice for 30 minutes. Labeled cells were analyzed with Guava 8HT flow cytometer ((EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Breast and Hematological Cancer Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The breast cancer cell lines, MDA‐MB‐231, MDA‐MB‐361, MDA‐MB‐415, MDA‐MB‐453, MCF7, HCC 1395, HCC 1806, and HCC 1954, were obtained from the ATCC Breast Cancer Cell panel (ATCC 30‐4500K, LGC Standards). Multiple myeloma cell line RPMI 8226 was obtained from LGC Standards and melanoma cell line ESTDAB‐056 was a gift from Prof Federico Garrido, (University of Granada, Spain). All cell lines were cultured in DMEM or RPMI‐1640 supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 50 μg/ml kanamycin (all ThermoFisher Scientific). For flow cytometry, cells were harvested from culture flasks with a 1–2 min incubation with trypsin (0.025%)‐EDTA (0.01%) solution at 37° celsius. Cells were then resuspended in culture medium to inactivate trypsin and centrifuged at 300g for 10 min at 4° celsius, then resuspended in PFN buffer (PBS, 2% FBS, 0.1% sodium azide). Cells were stained with primary mouse IgG anti‐HLA‐A, ‐B, and ‐C monoclonal antibody W6/32 [19 (link)] for 20 min at 4° celsius, followed by two washes with centrifugation steps as above in PFN. Cells were then stained with FITC‐anti‐mouse IgG (Sigma‐Aldrich UK, F2012) at a dilution of 1/100 for 20 min, and washed as above. Control cells received second stage FITC anti‐mouse IgG alone. Cells resuspended in PFN and were analysed on a Merck‐Millipore Guava 8HT flow cytometer with a 488‐nm laser using Guavasoft 2.7 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fluorochrome-labeled monoclonal antibodies used in this study included: antibodies against CD3-Peridinin Chlorophyll (Percp, Miltenyi Biotec), CD8-APCcy (Biolegend), CD4-phycoerytherin (PE, BD Pharmingen), CD27-APCcy7 (BD Pharmingen), IgD-PEcy7 (Biolegend, San Diego, CA), CD40L-PE (BD Pharmingen), CD19- fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC, BD Pharmingen), CD80-allophycocyanin (APC, BD Pharmingen), PD1-PE (BD Pharmingen), CD45RO-PEcy7 (BD Pharmingen), ki67-FITC (BD Pharmingen), IFN-γ-FITC (BD Pharmingen), CD38-APC, annexin V-FITC, and isotype control Abs (BD Pharmingen). No annexin V staining was used as a control for gating strategy. All others were gated based on isotypes. Cells were identified by their forward (FSC) and side scatter (SSC) characteristics and were analyzed with a Guava 8HT flow cytometer (Millipore, Billerica, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!