The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Genemapper version 4

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom

GeneMapper version 4.0 is a software tool developed by Thermo Fisher Scientific for the analysis of genetic data. It provides a platform for the visualization, editing, and interpretation of DNA fragment analysis data generated from various genetic analysis instruments.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

60 protocols using genemapper version 4

1

Mosquito Genotyping via Microsatellite Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer instructions, with an additional RNAse A (Qiagen) step. DNA samples were stored at -20°C until further analysis. Individual mosquitoes were genotyped as described in Brown et al. [13 (link)] for twelve previously published [2 (link),13 (link),14 ] microsatellite loci [A1, B2, B3, A9 (tri-nucleotide repeats), and AC2, CT2, AG2, AC4, AC1, AC5, AG1, and AG4 (di-nucleotide repeats)]. Microsatellite alleles were scored using GENEMAPPER version 4.0 (Applied Biosystems). Raw allele frequencies are available at VectorBase.org, Project ID VBP0000176 and are also available as Supporting Information (S1 Appendix).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genotyping APOE and TOMM40 Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For APOE, DNA was isolated from whole blood, and the target sequences for rs7412 and rs429358 were genotyped with TaqMan technology (Invitrogen website, 2012 ). These 2 SNPs form the APOE ε2/ε3/ε4 haplotype (commonly and herein simply “genotype”).
TOMM40 523 poly-T repeat length was genotyped by the laboratory of Dr. Ornit Chiba-Falek (Duke University, NC, USA) using a method described previously (Linnertz et al., 2012 ). Briefly, each genomic DNA sample was amplified by the polymerase chain reaction using fluorescently labeled forward 5′FAM-TGCTGACCTCAAGCTGTCCTG-3′ and reverse 5′-GAGGCTGAGAAGGGAGGATT-3′primers. Genotypes were determined on an ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer, using GeneMapper version 4.0 software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA) for fragment analysis by the amplified fragment length polymorphism method validated for research studies and commercially available.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

STR Profiling for Fibroblast and iPSC Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fibroblasts and iPSCs DNA was extracted by Dneasy blood and tissue kit (QIAGEN). PCR amplification of 19 distinct STRs (D13S252, D13S305, D13S634, D13S800, D13S628, D18S819, D18S535, D18S978, D18S386, D18S390, D21S11, D21S1437, D21S1409, D21S1442, D21S1435, D21S1446, DXS6803, XHPRT, DXS1187) was carried out using the QST*Rplusv2 kit (Elucigene Diagnostics), PCR products were separated on an ABI Prism 3130 DNA sequencer and analyzed by GeneMapper version 4.0 (Applied Biosystems).
The following are the supplementary data related to this article.

Mycoplasma test

Supplementary Fig. 1
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Microsatellite Genotyping of Callicarpa communis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genomic DNA was extracted from dried leaves of C. communis using the DNA extraction Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The quality of extracted DNA was measured by NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA).
Polymorphism was assayed on each DNA sample with 12 microsatellite markers developed in our previous study (Supplementary Table S1; Li et al., 2015b (link)). The amplification reaction was carried out in 20 μL reaction mixture, containing 30–50 ng genomic DNA, 7.5 μL of 2×Taq PCR MasterMix (Tiangen, Beijing, China), 0.6 μM of each primer. Three fluorescent compounds (HEX, ROX or 6-FAM, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were used to label the forward primers for the automated sequencers analysis (Supplementary Table S1). Amplification were carried out with an Eppendorf Mastercycler pro vapo protect thermocycler (AG, Hamburg, Germany), using the following thermocycling condition: initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of 30 s denaturation at 94°C, 30 s annealing at the optimal temperature (depending on each locus) and 1 min extension at 72°C, then 7 min at 72°C for the final extension. The ABI PRISM 3730XL DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosystems) and GeneMapper version 4.0 (Applied Biosystems) were used to separate the amplified products and determine the allele sizes, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fluorescence-based Polymorphism Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The loci that generated PCR products with expected sizes on agarose gel were assessed for polymorphisms by high-resolution capillary electrophoresis. PCR products were generated by Touchdown PCR with fluorescently labeled M13 (–21) (5′-TGTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3′) sequence-tag method [42] (link). Touchdown PCR was carried out using the following program: 95°C for 5 min; 30 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 45 s at 56°C and 45 s at 72°C; 10 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 45 s at 53°C and 45 s at 72°C; and a final extension of 5 min at 72°C. Fluorescently labeled PCR products were initially evaluated by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and then analyzed by capillary electrophoresis with the GeneScan-500 LIZ Size Standard on an ABI 3730XL sequencer and their sizes were determined with GeneMapper version 4.0 (Applied Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Microsatellite Genotyping of Hibbertia oldfieldii

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from 120 mg of leaf material per plant using a scaled‐down version of the CTAB method (Elliott and Byrne 2005) and genotyped at seven microsatellite loci (HoA102, HoB103, HoB126, HoB010, HoB105, HoA116, and HoB125) using primers and conditions developed for H. oldfieldii by Byrne and Hankinson (2009).
Amplification products were separated on a 3730 capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using a LIZ 500 (‐250) size standard. Bins were set and genotypes were scored using GENEMAPPER version 4.0 (Applied Biosystems) and checked manually. Samples were repeated for loci that failed to amplify or where seed genotypes were inconsistent with maternal genotypes. In addition, approximately 5% of samples were reamplified and rescored to check scoring accuracy.
To validate the microsatellite data, genotypes were tested for large allele dropout and stuttering artifacts, and the occurrence of null alleles using MICROCHECKER V. 2.2.3 (van Oosterhout et al. 2004). Tests for linkage disequilibrium were performed with global and exact tests for each locus/population combination using GENEPOP 4.2 (Rousset 2008).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Microsatellite Genotyping of M. persicae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five aphids from each iso‐female line from the Osborne population were genotyped across ten microsatellite loci: M35, M37, M40, M49, M55, M63, M86, myz2, myz9 and myz2516 following the DNA extraction and genotyping methods outlined in Umina et al.9 Loci were labelled with unique fluorophores and co‐amplified in three separate multiplex polymerase chain reactions (PCR) using a Qiagen multiplex kit and an Eppendorf Mastercycler S gradient PCR machine as described in Blacket et al.17 PCR products were analysed using a 3730 capillary analyser (Applied Biosystems) and genotyping was conducted using GeneMapper version 4.0 (Applied Biosystems).
Additionally, using the same approach described above, we identified the clonal type of aphids from all other M. persicae populations phenotypically screened for resistance via laboratory bioassays.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Validating Sex QTL Interval in Mozambique Admixture

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The significant sites in the Mozambique sex QTL interval were validated in another population. One hundred individuals were randomly collected from our breeding population, which is an admixture population. The DNA was extracted using a HiPure Tissue and Blood DNA Kit (Magen, Guangzhou, China), and the quality was tested with 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. Primers were designed using Primer-BLAST to cover the SNPs. PCRs were performed using a PCR amplification Kit (PrimeSTAR®HS, Takara, Dalian, China) with a program of 5 min at 94°C, 35 cycles of 45 s at 94°C, 45 s at 60°C, 45 s at 72°C, and 10 min at 72°C. Finally, PCR products were genotyped and sequenced on a 3130xl capillary DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, United States), and the allele sizes were analyzed using GeneMapper version 4.0 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, United States) and sequences were viewed using the Seqman software package (Lasergene Version 7.1; DNA Star Inc., Madison, WI, United States). The sites that contained the target SNPs in the mapping population were genotyped in the validation population as SNP or Indel (insertion or deletion). A genotypic (2 df) test was performed to test the relationship between genotype and sex (Purcell et al., 2007 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Microsatellite Genotyping and Error Estimation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Methods for DNA extraction and microsatellite typing follow Garg et al., [21 (link)]. We used Ampli-Taq Gold (Applied Biosystems) for PCR amplification for samples from seasons one to six and PCR Multiplex mastermix (MM; Qiagen) for the rest of the samples. We scored all microsatellite alleles twice with GENEMAPPER version 4.0 (Applied Biosystems) and standardized the entire dataset using TANDEM [23 (link)]. We determined the error rate for microsatellite typing by regenotyping 5% of samples from seasons one to six (for Ampli-Taq Gold) and seasons seven to ten (for MM) respectively. We also regenotyped 5% of samples from season one to six with MM to test for consistency between Ampli-Taq Gold and MM. Overall 12% of the samples were regenotyped.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genetic profiling of ALS and PLS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Of the 100 ALS patients, C9orf72 repeat expansion status was determined in 97 patients (Byrne et al., 2012 (link)). DNA samples from patients were tested for the presence of the pathogenic GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9orf72 by repeat-primed PCR using the Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA, USA) 3130xl Genetic Analyser and visualised using GeneMapper version 4.0 as described previously (Byrne et al., 2012 (link); Bede et al., 2013b (link)). Patients carrying more than 30 hexanucleotide repeats were considered positive for the expansion. Whole-genome sequence data were available for 44 ALS patients (Project Min, 2018 (link)) and targeted DNA sequence data for a further 27 ALS patients (Kenna et al., 2013 (link)). Whole exome sequence data were available for 29 of the 33 PLS patients (Finegan et al., 2019a (link)). Putative variants were defined as protein altering variants in the exons and splice sites of 33 genes linked to ALS on the ALS online database (Abel et al., 2013 (link)) and 70 genes linked to HSP (Klebe et al., 2015 (link)). C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion status in the PLS cohort was also determined using repeat-primed polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!