The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mab555

Manufactured by R&D Systems
Sourced in United States

MAB555 is an antibody product manufactured by R&D Systems. It is a monoclonal antibody specific for a particular target. The core function of this product is to bind to and detect the presence of this target in research and laboratory applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using mab555

1

TSLP Blockade Intranasal Delivery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For TSLP blockade experiments an anti-TSLP antibody (#MAB555 from R&D, Inc., 20μg/20μL in saline intranasally) was delivered for 3 consecutive days, 3 days prior to analysis in week 10. An isotype rat IgG2a (#MAB006) antibody was used as a control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antagonist-Mediated TSLP Inhibition in Allergic Skin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BQ123, SB, Ket, cetirizine, and L733060 were from Tocris. Mouse monoclonal TSLP-neutralizing Ab (MAB555) was from R&D Systems. The antagonists and Ab dosages were based on previous studies (16 (link), 42 (link), 43 (link)). Antagonists were prepared in stock solution, diluted in PBS, and injected in 5 mL/kg volume (i.p.) 45 minutes before the test. TSLP-neutralizing Ab or isotype control IgG (rat IgG, Sigma-Aldrich) was administered at 7 sites in the inflamed skin (15 μL/site) by intradermal injection via Hamilton syringe under sevoflurane anesthesia.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Airway Resistance and Compliance in HDM-Induced Asthma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were sensitized intranasally (i.n.) with 50 μg of HDM (Dermatophagoides. pteronyssinus; Greer Laboratories, XPB82D3A2.5) on day 1, followed by 10 μg of HDM (i.n.) on days 8 and 13. In some experiments, mice were treated with 3-MA (i.p., 300 mg; Sigma-Aldrich, M9281), dexamethasone (i.p., 1 mg/kg; Sigma-Aldrich, D4902) or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Gibco, 14,190), anti-mouse IL33 antibody (i.n., 6 μg/mice, clone 396,118; R&D, AF3626) or Goat IgG isotype controls (R&D, AB-108-C), and anti-mouse TSLP antibody (i.n., 20 μg/mice, clone 152,614; R&D, MAB555) or Rat IgG2A isotype control antibody (R&D, MAB006), one day before each HDM challenge. Two days after the last HDM challenge, mice were anesthetized using 300 μl i.p. injection of ketamine (10 mg/ml) and xylazine (1 mg/ml). Measurements of airway resistance and dynamic compliance were conducted using the Fine Pointe RC system (Buxco Research Systems), in which mice were mechanically ventilated using a modified version as described previously [18 (link),68 (link)]. Mice were sequentially challenged with aerosolized PBS (baseline), followed by increasing doses of methacholine (2.5 mg/ml, 5.0 mg/ml, 10 mg/ml, 20 mg/ml and 40 mg/ml); Sigma-Aldrich, A2251. RL and Cdyn values were recorded during a 3-min period after each methacholine challenge.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Allergic Airway Inflammation Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were sensitized by a subcutaneous injection of 25 μg of OVA (grade V, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) adsorbed in 1 mg of aluminum hydroxide (Aldrich, Milwaukee, WI, USA) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) on days 0 and 7. They were challenged four times by intranasal administration of OVA (20 μg/50 μL in PBS), beginning on day 21. On each day of OVA challenge, mice were given either 1mg/kg of anti-TSLP Ab (MAB555, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) intranasally or 7 mg/kg CRTH2 antagonist (TM30089, ChemieTek, Indianapolis, IN, USA) orally 2 hours before the challenge. Anti-TSLP Ab and TM30089 were dissolved in PBS. The control group was treated in the same way, with PBS without OVA. Animals were sacrificed 24 hours after the last OVA challenge.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!