The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Analytical profile index

Manufactured by bioMérieux
Sourced in France, United States

The Analytical Profile Index is a laboratory test kit used for the identification and classification of microorganisms. It provides a standardized system for the biochemical characterization of a wide range of bacterial and yeast species. The product enables accurate and consistent identification of microorganisms through a series of standardized biochemical reactions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using analytical profile index

1

Urine Culture and Bacterial Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Well-mixed urine was inoculated on Cystine-Lactose-Electrolyte-Deficient and blood agar (Oxoid, LTD, UK) using a wire loop having a capacity of containing 0.001 ml of urine. After incubation at 37°C for 24 h, the phenotypic characterization of bacteria was done using colony characteristics. The colonies were counted (a single colony represents one organism) and multiplied by 1000 to determine the number of bacteria per milliliter of the original urine sample. A count of 105 colony-forming units per milliliter of urine was considered significant bacteriuria, which indicates the presence of UTI.4
Differentiation of the isolates to the species level was performed using the analytical profile index (bioMérieux® SA, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) biochemical reactions strips. In brief, a 0.5 McFarland bacterial suspension was prepared and dispensed to rehydrate each of the wells and the strips were incubated according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. All reactive and nonreactive reactions were compiled to obtain a profile number, which was then compared with profile numbers in the APIWEB™ database to determine the bacterial species.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Microbial Enumeration in Cheese Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total microbial count was determined according to the methodology described by Şengül [22 (link)] with modifications. Briefly, a 20 g cheese in 100 mL (2.0%) sodium citrate solution was homogenized (5 min) using a Lab-Blender with a stainless steel cup (Waring Lab Co., Maple St, Carrollton, TX, USA; Model number 7010HS). Serial dilutions were prepared using 0.1% sterile peptone water. The following analyses were made on cheese samples: total colony counts (PCA; 37 °C/48 h); coliforms on violet red bile agar (VRBA; at 32 °C/24 h) [23 (link)]; Staphylococcus aureus on Baird–Parker egg yolk–tellurite medium (BPM; at 37 °C/48 h) [23 (link)]; total LAB on the Elliker agar at 37 °C/24 h; molds and yeasts on yeast extract sucrose agar (YESA; at 25 °C/5 days) [24 (link)].
Biochemical identification insurance for gifted strains was made for the bacterial strains using the API-strip test (Analytical Profile Index, bioMérieux-Boston, MA, Cambridge, USA) to emphasize the purity, where the techniques used have been described in detail previously by Funke et al. [25 (link)]. The commercial API kits (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and reading was performed after incubation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation and Identification of Enteric Bacteria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each sample was inoculated on four media: MacConkey agar (ThermoScientific, United States) for isolation of non-lactose fermenters and E. coli, Thiosulphate Citrate Bile Salt agar, TCBS (Park Scientific, United Kingdom) for isolation of Vibrio spp., Alkaline Peptone Water, APW (Himedia, India), an enrichment medium for isolation of Vibrio spp. and Selenite Faecal Broth, SFB (Himedia, India) an enrichment medium for isolation of Salmonella and Shigella spp. and then incubated aerobically at 37°C for 18–24 h for isolation of enteric bacteria (Bolinches et al., 1988 (link); Akuffo et al., 2017 (link)). A loopful of SFB and APW broth cultures were sub-cultured onto Salmonella Shigella Agar (SS) and TCBS respectively and incubated as previously. Suspected colonies of Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., E. coli, and Vibrio spp. were purified and identified by colonial characteristics, Gram staining reaction (Park Scientific, United Kingdom), standard biochemical methods-Analytical Profile Index (Biomerieux, United States), and Microscan Autoscan4 (Beckman Coulter, United States), and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight, MALDI-TOF (Bruker, United States). Shigella, E. coli, Salmonella, and Vibrio cholerae isolates were antigenically characterized using serological kits from Denka Seiken, Japan (Nath et al., 2013 (link); Pun, 2014 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Standardized Microbiological Sample Processing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood, lung aspirate, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), pleural fluid, and other microbiological samples were processed at the MRC Basse Field Station using standard methods [23 (link)]. Aerobic and anaerobic blood cultures were taken for each adult patient, with 5 mL of blood added to each bottle. Children had 2–3 mL added to a single pediatric blood culture bottle. Bottles were weighed before and after blood was added to ensure adequate filling, with weights reported to clinicians. Biochemical tests, including the Analytical Profile Index (bioMérieux, UK), and serological tests were used to confirm suspected pathogens. Latex agglutination tests were used on all CSF samples to identify Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis, and group B streptococci. Results were aggregated with culture-positive cases. Pneumococcal isolates were serotyped at the MRC Fajara laboratory using a latex agglutination assay employing factor and group-specific antisera (Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark) and polymerase chain reaction [24 (link)]. The laboratories in Basse and Fajara submitted to external quality assurance throughout the study (UK National External Quality Assessment Service, World Health Organization [WHO] reference laboratory in Denmark, and the Royal Australasian College of Pathologists).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Urine Microscopy and Bacteriuria Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Urine microscopy was done using uncentrifuged urine and urine sediment.[16 ] The specimen was inoculated on cysteine lactose electrolyte deficient and blood media and incubated aerobically at 35–37°C for 18–24 h. Significant bacteriuria count was performed on blood agar using a calibrated wire loop. Secondary Gram stain was done using discrete colonies from the blood agar plate. Further identification was performed using conventional technique such as oxidase, motility, triple sugar iron agar, indole, urease, and citrate tests.[16 ] Analytical profile index Biomerieux was used for some of the difficult to identify isolates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance in Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At each study visit, sterile swabs (BactiSwab, Remel, Lenexa, KS) were used to obtain samples from 5 anatomical sites (ie, perirectal area, groin, nares, oropharynx, and dominant hand), as well as any wounds, indwelling urinary catheters, or feeding tubes. All patients provided consent. Swabs from the hand were enriched overnight in brain–heart infusion broth at 36°C to improve culture sensitivity, considering lower bacterial burden from hands compared to anatomical sites. All swabs were plated on MacConkey agar. Genus and species of colonies were identified using bioMerieux analytical profile index (API, bioMerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disk diffusion was performed according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (M100-S23). Gram-negative bacilli were considered antimicrobial resistant (R-GNB) if nonsusceptible to ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, or imipenem for all species except Proteus mirabilis. P. mirabilis isolates were considered R-GNB if they were nonsusceptible to ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, or meropenem.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Identification of Bacterial and Fungal Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Positive blood cultures were sub-cultured on sheep-blood, MacConkey, chocolate, and Sabouraud Dextrose agar (SDA) plates. Standard microbiological methods such as conventional biochemical tests and analytical profile index (API) (bioMérieux SA, Marcy l’Etoile, France) were used for identifying bacterial isolates. Fungal isolates that grew on SDA were Gram stained, and for yeast cells germ-tube test was performed. Final identification of both bacterial and fungal isolates was done with MALDI-TOF MS using the Microflex LT instrument and MALDI Biotyper 3.1 software (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cerebrospinal Fluid Bacterial Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All CSF samples were processed in the microbiology laboratory according to the standard operating procedure [20 ]. Briefly, CSF samples were inoculated on sheep blood agar, chocolate agar, and MacConkey agar. Bacterial identification was performed by analytical profile index (API) (Biomerieux) [20 ]. Antibiotic susceptibility was determined by the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [13 ] The laboratory deployed antibacterial testing of the drugs per the CLSI criteria for each bacterium and the laboratory's availability of antibiotic discs for the given years. Agents administered by oral routes only, first and second-generation cephalosporins and cephamycins, doripenem, ertapenem, imipenem and lefamulin, clindamycin, macrolides, tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones were excluded for the CSF isolates as per CLSI recommendation [13 ]. Based on a review of clinical practice in PINS throughout the study, the following antibiotics were tested, amikacin, gentamicin, cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole), ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefoperazone, cefotaxime, cefepime, piperacillin, ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, piperacillin-tazobactam, ampicillin-sulbactam, meropenem, oxacillin, penicillin, vancomycin, and linezolid.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Physiological-Biochemical Characterization of Isolate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Physiological-biochemical characterization of isolate CH-KOV3 was conducted using Analytical Profile Index (API) (BioMérieux, France) kits: 20 NE, 20 E, CORYNE, and API ZYM. All API tests were performed according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Identification of Blood Culture Pathogens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Selective and non-selective culture media were used for the primary cultures (culture study) of the positive blood cultures including 5% blood-sheep agar, Levin agar (Eosin-methylene blue), CHROMagar Candida, and enriching liquid medium -thioglycolate broth. The cultivation was performed in an aerobic environment. The incubation of the primary cultures was performed at 35°C ± 2°C for 24 h, after which the sample was read. With a positive culture finding, the pathogen was identified by routine biochemical tests (plasma coagulase test, catalase test, optochin test, oxidase test, indole, methyl red, Voges-Proskauer, Urea, Citrate, etc.), semiautomated (Analytical Profile Index -API, bioMerieux, France), and automated systems (VITEK-2 Compact System and VITEK MS PLUS, bioMerieux, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!