The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using ab16956

1

Western Blot Analysis of Cellular Biomolecules

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood inside organs were removed by rinsing tissues with PBS. Tissues were snap-frozen under liquid nitrogen. Tissues were homogenized in RIPA buffer (Sigma) with protease (Roche), deacetylase (nicotinamide, Tricostatin A) and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche)7 (link). Protein concentrations of samples were determined by Lowry assay and each amount of protein (30–50 ug per sample) were loaded for SDS-PAGE. Antibodies from the following companies were used for Western blot analysis: Phospho-H2Ax (1:500, NBP1-19255-Novus Biological), PAR (1:500, AM80100UG-Millipore), actin (1:5000, sc-8432-Santa Cruz), nitrotyrosine (1:500, 06-284-Millipore) acetyl-lysine (1:1000, 9441-Cell signaling), HIF1a (1:400, 14179-Cell Signaling), GLUT1 (1:500, ab652-Abcam), PDK4 (1:1000, 3820-Cell Signaling), LDHA (1:1000, 3582-Cell Signaling), SDHA (1:10000, ab14715-Abcam), Ndufs4 (1:1000, ab87399-Abcam,), SOD2 (1:1000, ab16956-Abcam) SOD2-Ac (1:1000, ab137037-Abcam), GDH (1:1000, 12793-Cell Signaling). Blots were blocked in 5% BSA-TBST. Antibodies were diluted in 5% BSA-TBST. Protein bands were visualized with chemiluminescence assay (Pierce) with secondary antibodies coupled with HRP. The protein abundance was analyzed by densitometry with ImageJ. SDHA or actin were used as a loading control for quantification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunoblotting of Mitochondrial Proteins from Mouse Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Synaptic mitochondrial lysates were prepared as described above from mouse brain tissue. Immunoblotting was completed as previously described [58 (link)]. Briefly, equal amounts of protein (10 μg) were loaded onto 4-12% Bis-Tris gels, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, blocked, and incubated with the following antibodies overnight at 4°C: the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) panel (1:5000) (MS604; Mitoscences), SOD2 (1:10,000) (ab16956; Abcam), VDAC1 (1:10,000) (4661; Cell Signaling), ATP5H (1:10,000) (MS504; Mitosciences), MFN1 (1:2,000) (ab57602; Abcam), TFAM (1:4,000) (LS-C30495; LifeSpan Biosciences), DRP1 (1:2000) (D8H5, Cell Signaling), and SQSTM1 (1:8000) (PM045, MBL). The OXPHOS antibody panel is a mix of antibodies that include: NDUFB8, SDHB, UQCRC2, MTCO1, and ATP5A1. Since commonly used mitochondrial protein loading controls (VDAC1 and GAPDH) change during aging according to our proteomics and under different conditions [59 (link), 60 (link)], we performed Coomassie staining to confirm equal protein loading (Supplemental Figure 1). Ponceau staining was done to confirm equal protein loading for each membrane. Chemiluminescent bands were visualized with an Image Station 4000MM Pro and analyzed using Carestream Molecular Imaging software (both from Carestream Health, Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Protein Expression Analysis in HepG2 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After treatment for 48 h, HepG2 cells were lysed with RIPA buffer containing complete Mini protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). After centrifugation, the supernatant was collected and stored at -80°C. Proteins were resolved by SDS–PAGE using commercially available 4–12% NuPAGE Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen, Basel, Switzerland) and transferred using the Trans-Blot Turbo Blotting System (Bio-Rad, Cressier, Switzerland). The membranes were incubated with PARP (46D11) rabbit mAb (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, United States), Anti-active Caspase-3 antibody (ab32042, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom), Anti-pro Caspase 3 antibody (ab32150, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom), Anti-SOD1 (ab20926, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) or Anti-SOD2 (ab16956, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) antibodies. After washing, membranes were exposed to secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, United States). Immunoblots were developed using enhanced chemiluminescence (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom). Band intensities of the scanned images were quantified using the National Institutes of Health Image J program, version 1.48.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Osteoclast Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from osteoclasts using peqGOLD TriFast (PeqLab, Erlangen, Germany) at the indicated time points, reverse transcribed into cDNA and analyzed with SYBR Green-based quantitative Real-Time PCR in triplicates. mRNA expression level was normalized to GAPDH, β-actin or RNA polymerase II Polr2a. GAPDH is commonly used as a reference gene in osteoclast studies and indeed was stable in our experiments. To confirm that it does not affect the results when analyzing genes involved in energy metabolism we also used the mentioned above genes.
Antibodies to the following proteins were used for western blotting: NFATc1 (sc-7294, Santa Cruz), DC-STAMP (MABF39, Millipore), Sirt1 (07–131, Millipore), Sirt3 (#5490, Cell signaling), acetylated Sod2 (acetyl-superoxide dismutase K68, ab137037, Abcam), Sod2 (ab16956, Abcam), phosphorylated AMPKα (AMP-activated protein kinase, #2535, Cell Signaling), AMPKα (#2793, Cell Signaling), phosphorylated ACC (Acetyl CoA Carboxylase, #3661, Cell Signaling), ACC (#3662, Cell Signaling), acetylated p65 (Acetyl-NF-κB p65(Lys310) #3045, Cell signaling), p65 (#3987, Cell signaling), IκBα (#4814, Cell signaling), HSP90 (610419, BD Transduction laboratories) and GAPDH (ab8245, Abcam, UK) were used as reference proteins.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunoblot Analysis of Mitochondrial Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoblot analysis was performed as we described previously30 (link). Rabbit polyclonal anti-ANT-1 antibody and rabbit monoclonal anti-β-actin antibody were from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA, SAB2105530, 1:1,000) and Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA, USA, 4970, 1:5,000), respectively. Rabbit polyclonal anti-ANT2 antibody was generated by immunization with KLH-conjugated N-terminus ANT2 peptide (NH-TDAAVSFAKDFLAG-COOH) at Lampire Biological Laboratories (Ottsville, PA, USA) and purified with protein G (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) and antigen-conjugated columns. The ANT2 antibody was diluted to 1:200 as being used. COX IV (4850, 1:1,000) and VDAC (4866, 1:1,000) antibodies were from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA, USA). Tom20 antibody was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (sc-11415, 1:500), Catalase and SOD2 antibodies were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA, C0979, 1:1,000) and Abcam (Cambridge, UK, ab16956, 1:1,000), respectively. Uncropped scans of the critical immunoblots are shown in Supplementary Fig. 6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Antioxidant Enzymes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The slides were dewaxed, rehydrated, and rinsed twice in phosphate-buffered saline. Antigen retrieval with HistoReveal (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) was performed as a pretreatment. Slides were incubated with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 min and then with Protein Block (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) for 30 min. Sections were incubated with anti-NOS-3 mouse monoclonal antibodies (sc-376751, 1:50, Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA), anti-MnSOD mouse monoclonal antibodies (ab16956, 1:300, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and anti-MMP-9 mouse antibodies (DuoSet Human MMP-9/TIMP-1 Complex, DY1449, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) at 4 °C for 18 h. The color reaction was performed using biotinylated goat anti-polyvalent, streptavidin peroxidase, and DAB substrate (ab64264, Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Nucleic and other basophilic proteins were counterstained with hematoxylin (ab220365, Abcam, Cambridge, UK). The negative control consisted of samples incubated without the primary antibody. Slides were dehydrated, closed with a glass coverslip using DPX (Avantor Performance Materials Poland S.A, Gliwice, Poland), and examined using an Olympus BX51 microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot Analysis of Cellular Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were separated by SDS‐PAGE, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and blocked in BSA. Primary antibodies were diluted as follows: NFE2L2 (H300) 1:2500 (sc‐13032; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX), PGAM5 1:3000, CS 1:5000 and SOD2 1:10000 (ab126534, ab16956, ab96600; Abcam plc, Cambridge, UK). IR dye‐coupled secondary antibodies were detected in a fluorescence scanner (Odyssey Scanner; LI‐COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE). Quantitative analysis was performed using ImageJ software (Schneider et al., 2012).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein Extraction from FFPE Cerebellum

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were isolated from microdissected formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) cerebellum sections using the Qproteome FFPE Tissue kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturers' instructions. Subsequent Western blotting of protein lysates and densitometric analysis were carried out as previously described.29 Primary antibodies used were anti‐β actin (ab8227, 1:5,000, Abcam), anti‐catalase (C0979, 1:2,000, Sigma‐Aldrich), anti‐human frataxin (ab110328, 1:2,000, Abcam), anti‐frataxin (ab113691, 1:2,000, Abcam), anti–glutathione peroxidase‐1 (ab22604, 1:1,000, Abcam), anti‐NeuN (ab177487, 1:5,000, Abcam), anti–nuclear factor (erythroid‐derived 2)‐like 2 (Nrf2; sc‐722, 1:3,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), anti‐peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor gamma coactivator 1‐alpha (PGC‐1alpha) (sc‐13067, 1:3,000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti‐SOD1 (ab16831, 1:5,000, Abcam), and anti‐SOD2 (ab16956, 1:5,000, Abcam). (Of note, increases in total frataxin are likely to be underestimated when compared to human frataxin due to differences in antibody (ab113691, Abcam) species reactivity; the human protein reactivity of the antibody is approximately 50% of mouse protein reactivity at the same concentration. Commercial mouse‐specific frataxin antibodies are not available.)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!