The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sas proc glm

Manufactured by SAS Institute
Sourced in United States

SAS PROC GLM is a statistical procedure within the SAS software suite that performs general linear model analysis. It provides functionality for analyzing data using techniques such as linear regression, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The procedure offers a flexible framework for model specification and hypothesis testing.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

35 protocols using sas proc glm

1

Determinants of Depression in Graves' Disease

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All analyses were performed with SAS 9.1. Sample characterization was performed using the procedures SAS PROC FREQ, PROC MEANS, PROC TTEST and PROC NPAR1WAY. Mean levels of depression and anxiety symptoms, as measured by the 0-21 scored scales in the two patient groups, were compared using multiple linear regression (SAS PROC GLM). The analyses were also controlled for age, sex, educational level, comorbidity, cohabitation and time since diagnosis (covariates). Clinical and socio-demographic determinants of symptom severity in patients with Graves' disease were evaluated by multiple linear regression (SAS PROC GLM). The covariates were: age, gender, education, comorbidity, cohabitation, time since diagnosis, TRAb, TPOAb, and thyroid function (represented by fT4) levels. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by entering the covariates fT3, TSH, current thyroid dysfunction (mild/overt hypo/hyperthyroidism, cf. table 1) and being untreated, both separately and simultaneously in the regression model.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Investigating Antimalarial Sugar Impacts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The details of statistical methods are listed in the figure legends. Data were analyzed in GraphPad Prism 8 unless otherwise indicated. The unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test or Mann-Whitney test were used to compare two groups depending on the normality of the data. The one-way ANOVA with different multiple comparisons tests were used to compare the difference among more than two groups depending on the normality of the data. The statistical analysis of metabolomics data and transcriptome data are described in the corresponding methods. For correlation analysis, we divided the sugar content into groups by their medians. Then ANOVA analysis was applied to evaluate the impact of the different sugar and their combination on A. bogorensis load and P. berghei load. The ANOVA analysis was performed by using SAS proc glm (SAS Institute, USA). The number of biological replicates and the significant differences were shown in the corresponding figure legends.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

ANOVA-based Association Analysis of Yield Traits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The single-factor ANOVA method of association analysis was used to test the association between constructed SNPLBD markers and GCA effect values of 11 yield-related traits. The linear model is calculated as follows:
where yij is the jth observation of the ith allele at the SNPLDB under testing, μ is population mean, ai is the effect of i-th allele and εij is random error.
All the computations of association analysis were performed using SAS PROC GLM (Release 9.1.3; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). The significant SNPLDBs on the chromosomal region were selected based on the least P-value (α = 0.01 probability level). The coefficient of determination (R2) was estimated to determine the percentage of phenotypic variation explained by each associated SNPLDB marker. Further, the genes that lie within the intervals of associated SNPLDBs were searched and annotated using the Rice Genome Annotation Project (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/) database for a detailed investigation of their biological and molecular functions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analyzing Recombinant Inbred Line Traits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Least square means (lsmeans) were calculated for each RIL over all 3 environments in SAS PROC GLM (SAS Institute, 2004), using RIL and environment (three environments: the two replications from Arlington were considered as distinct environments) as fixed effects. Least square means for each RIL were used as phenotypic data for correlation and QTL analysis. Phenotypic correlations were calculated as Pearson product-moment coefficients using SAS PROC CORR. Coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated by dividing square root of the mean square error by mean (multiplied by 100). Phenotypic data for B73 and Mo17 were compared against each other using SAS PROC GLM, with genotype and environment as fixed effects.
Heritabilities were calculated according to Holland et al. [30 ] on an entry mean basis using SAS PROC MIXED by fitting lines, locations, lines x locations (G x E), and field replications as random effects.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Analyzing Objective Quality and Volatiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance. Using SAS PROC GLM
(SAS Institute, USA), we assessed the main effects of the variables in the two
experiments and injection treatments in regard to their objective quality traits
and volatiles. The means of the measurements were compared using Duncan’s
multiple-range test at a significance level of 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Regression Diagnostics for Warmth Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thorough regression diagnostics were performed on the warmth and dominance scores to check for outliers, leverage, influential data, heteroscedasticity, and multicollinearity of residuals, and confirmed that our data met the assumptions for linear regression analysis. Mixed effects general linear models (SAS Proc Mixed) were used to analyze group differences in change from premorbid to current warmth. The threshold for statistical significance was set at p < .013, Benjamini-Yekutieli (B-Y) corrected (Narum, 2006 ) for n = 25 multiple comparisons. General linear models (SAS Proc GLM) were performed to examine group differences in RCIwarmth score, and Dunnett-Hsu post-hoc tests were used to compare patient groups' least-square RCIwarmth score to the NC group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis Methods for Biological Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 7.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc, CA) and SAS Proc GLM (SAS 9.4). All the data were assessed for normality and equal variance using GraphPad Prism and SAS Proc GLM. Continuous data were examined by Shapiro-Wilk test for normality. Unpaired 2-tailed Student t test was used to determine statistical difference between 2 groups for normally distributed continuous variables. For comparison of multiple groups, ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparison analysis or 2-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc tests were used. For data without normal distribution, nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test were applied. In data that revealed unequal variance, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was applied. For incidence of AAA, Fisher exact test was performed. In the case of blood pressure, repeated measure 2-way ANOVA was used to determine between and within group differences, with time as the repeating factor. All data are presented as mean±SEM. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant for all tests.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Seed Germination and Vigor Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis of variance and T-tests for germination and vigor testing were conducted using SAS PROC GLM (SAS Institute Inc., 2012) to analyze seed treatment effects. Two-sample T-tests were conducted to compare treated versus untreated samples in disease control experiments, and polymer film drying using SAS PROC GLM. Equal variance was determined using Hartley’s F-max test, thus a pooled variance was used. Data was log transformed for disease control and polymer film t-tests and transformed back for presentation. Statistical analysis of storage stability studies was done using SAS PROC GLM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Ecogeographical Analysis of Teosinte Races

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differences among races and species for the various environmental variables were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance using SAS proc GLM [40 ] with race treated as a class variable. It should be noted that there was high collinearity within groups of variables, therefore F values among races and correlation coefficients were used to select variables for further analysis. At this stage, variable selection for clustering and classification (VSCC) technique was used; it is intended to find the variables that simultaneously minimize the ‘within-group’ variance and maximize the ‘between-group’ variance [41 ]. Principal components analysis was conducted to synthetically analyze ecogeographical data; using the first two principal components, a biplot graph was built and visualized with NTSyS 2.2 [42 ]. In addition, linear discriminant analysis was used to verify if the recorded sites of teosinte were correctly assigned to “geographic races” and species.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Analyzing Group Differences in Neuropsychological Measures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Group differences on potentially confounding covariates (age, sex, education, MMSE) were analyzed using general linear models in SAS (SAS Proc GLM). GLMs were also used to analyze group differences in RSMS and BFD scores, controlling for age, sex, education, and MMSE score (as a proxy for disease severity). Prior to GLM analysis, RSMS and BDF scores were evaluated in order to determine the presence of outliers. Data points considered inappropriately influential were removed after statistical examination of leverage, distance, influence, and collinearity, resulting in exclusion of one aberrant observation from the original data set. Dunnett-Hsu post-hoc tests were performed to compare each patient group’s least-square mean RSMS and BFD scores to those of NCs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!