The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Operant conditioning chamber

Manufactured by Harvard Apparatus
Sourced in United States

Operant conditioning chambers, also known as Skinner boxes, are lab equipment designed to study and train animal behavior. These chambers provide a controlled environment where animals can perform specific actions, such as pressing a lever or pecking a key, to receive a reward or avoid a consequence. The core function of these chambers is to enable researchers to observe and analyze the behavioral patterns that emerge from this type of operant conditioning.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using operant conditioning chamber

1

Contextual Fear Conditioning Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experimental manipulations (fear conditioning, retrieval, extinction, reinstatement, reinstatement probe) were administered in the same context (operant conditioning chambers; Coulbourn Instruments, Whitehall, PA). Each chamber was equipped with a stainless-steel rod flooring connected to a shock generator (Model H10-11R-TC-SF; Coulbourn Instruments, Whitehall, PA) and individually enclosed in a sound-insulated box (Isolation Cubicle, Model H10-24T; Coulbourn Instruments, Whitehall, PA). Chambers were illuminated with a red light. Behavior was recorded by infrared digital cameras (Panasonic, model wvBP334, Osaka, Japan) mounted on the ceiling of each unit. Stimulus presentation was automated using FreezeFrame2 software (Coulbourn Instruments, Whitehall, PA). Equipment was cleaned with Windex (SC Johnson, Racine, WI) between each session.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Operant Conditioning in Soundproof Chambers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Training and tests were conducted in operant conditioning chambers (Coulbourn Instruments) housed in sound isolation chambers as previously described23 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fear Conditioning and Long-Term Memory

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experimental manipulations (fear conditioning, extinction, long-term memory) were administered in the same context (operant conditioning chambers; Coulbourn Instruments, Whitehall, PA). Each chamber was equipped with a stainless-steel rod flooring connected to a shock generator (Model H10–11R-TC-SF; Coulbourn Instruments, Whitehall, PA) and individually enclosed in a sound-insulated box (Isolation Cubicle, Model H10–24T; Coulbourn Instruments, Whitehall, PA). Chambers were illuminated with a red light. Behavior was recorded by infrared digital cameras (Panasonic, model wvBP334, Osaka, Japan) mounted on the ceiling of each unit. Stimulus presentation was automated using FreezeFrame2 software (Coulbourn Instruments, Whitehall, PA). Equipment was cleaned with Windex (SC Johnson, Racine, WI) between each session.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Rodent Fear Conditioning Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experimental manipulations (fear conditioning, extinction, fear expression) were administered in the same context (operant conditioning chambers; Coulbourn Instruments, Whitehall, PA, USA). Chambers were equipped with stainless-steel rod floor bottoms connected to a shock generator (Model H10-11R-TC-SF; Coulbourn Instruments). All chambers were illuminated under red light. Behavior was recorded by infrared digital cameras (Panasonic, model wvBP344, Osaka, Japan), mounted on the ceiling of each unit. An automated stimulus presentation was elicited using Freezeframe2 software (Coulbourn Instruments, Whitehall, PA, USA). Between each session, chambers were cleaned with Windex (SC Johnson, Racine, WI, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Operant Conditioning of Rats for Food Reward

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sprague-Dawley rats were first food trained in a 20hr overnight session to lever press on a fixed ratio (FR) 1 for 45mg grain pellets (Bioserv) in operant conditioning chambers (Coulbourn Instruments). The chambers were placed in sound attenuating isolation cubicles (Coulbourn Instruments) and were equipped with two retractable levers and a food dispenser positioned between the levers. Pressing the lever positioned to the right of the dispenser (active lever) resulted in delivery of a food pellet, whereas pressing the left (inactive) lever had no programmed consequences. Surgery was performed 48hrs after reaching a criteria of 100 lever presses during a single food training session.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Autoshaping and Self-Administration in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rats received seven autoshaping sessions in which were trained to self-administer food pellets under a FR-1 schedule 30 minutes sessions (4 before and 3 after catheter implantation (Fig 1). Food was not restricted during autoshaping sessions. At the age of 52 ± 1 days, the rats underwent 24 self-administration sessions (120 min, FR-1) in operant conditioning chambers (Coulbourn Instruments, Allentown, PA, USA) according to the scheme in Fig 1. Every three days the infusion pump parameters were adjusted to the weight of each animal (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA, USA) and an ad-hoc program (Med-PC software) was used to control the effects of two levers: active (infusion of the corresponding treatment) or inactive (no effect). A light was on above the active lever to indicate the availability of the reinforcement, staying off for 20 seconds (Time-off) after each valid response or permanently when the maximum number of 15 infusions had been reached.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Operant Conditioning Chamber Setup

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each operant conditioning chamber (29 cm × 26 cm × 33 cm; Coulbourn Instruments, Allentown, PA) was made of aluminum and Plexiglas walls, an aluminum ceiling, and a stainless steel grid floor. Two response levers were located on the front wall 10 cm above the chamber floor on either side of an aperture for delivery of food pellets (not used in this study) located 2 cm above the floor. LED stimulus lights were located 2 cm above each response lever. Water was continuously available via a spout mounted on the back wall of the chamber. Each chamber was placed inside a sound-attenuating cubicle equipped with an exhaust fan that provided masking noise. Infusion pumps (Model RHSY, Fluid Metering, Syosset, NY) placed outside each cubicle delivered infusions through Tygon tubing connected to a fluid swivel mounted above the chamber, and from the swivel through a spring leash connected to a guide cannula mounted in a harness assembly on the back of the rat. MED-PC IV (Med Associates, St Albans, VT) software was used for operating the apparatus and recording data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Contextual Fear Conditioning Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eighteen days after surgery (8–10 days after exercise), hippocampal-dependent contextual fear conditioning was performed7 (link). Rats were placed into the operant conditioning chamber (Coulbourn Instruments, Whitehall, PA) for 370 seconds with a 2 second 1.5 mA shock administered at second 340. The following day, rats remained in the chamber for 480 seconds with no shock administered. Amount of time freezing was quantified (FreezeFrame, Coulbourn Instruments) prior to the shock on the first day (Baseline) and for the entire duration on the second day (Contextual). Animals that froze more than 50% on the first day were excluded from further analysis (n=1, global cerebral ischemia with moderate exercise).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!