The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using samdri 790

1

Topographical Analysis of Implant Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples were subjected to SEM evaluation to study the topographical changes in implant surface and remaining bacterial biofilm. The implants were placed in fixative solution (4% paraformaldehyde, 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate (NaCac)) buffer, pH 7.4, overnight and post-fixed in 2% osmium tetroxide in NaCac buffer, dehydrated through a graded ethanol series (25–100%), and critical-point dried using CO2 (Samdri790, Tousimis, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA). The dried implants were mounted on aluminum stubs with carbon adhesive tabs, electrically grounded with colloidal graphite, and sputter-coated for 6 min with gold-palladium (Anatech Hummer™6.2, Union City, CA, USA). The implants were imaged by a scanning electron microscope SEM (FEI, Inspect S50, Berno, Czech Republic), which was operated at 20 kV and electronic images were then captured. Four images were then recorded from each implant at the apical three threads using 1000×, 6000×, and 12,000× magnification. Representative images of each treatment were selected for presentation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Biofilm Formation in Methamphetamine Exposure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess biofilm formation in vivo in the setting of METH administration, SEM was used to examine the teeth of untreated animals and animals treated with 25 μM METH, 2% sucrose, and 25 μM METH plus 2% sucrose. After extraction, teeth were fixed overnight (4% formaldehyde [Sigma] and 1% glutaraldehyde [Sigma] in PBS), washed for 5 min in PBS, and placed in 1% osmium tetroxide (Sigma) for 30 min. After a series of alcohol washes, the samples were critical-point dried (Samdri-790; Tousimis), mounted, gold coated (Desk-1; Denton Vacuum, Inc.), and viewed in a JEOL JSM-6400 scanning electron microscope in high-vacuum mode at 10 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Ultrastructural Analysis of Beroe Ctenophores

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adult, 0.5-5 cm, Beroe were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.2 M phosphate-buffered saline (pH=7.6) for 4 hours at room temperature and washed for 2 hours in 2.5% sodium bicarbonate. Animals then were then dissected into a few smaller pieces. For secondary fixation, we used 2% osmium tetroxide in 1.25% Sodium Bicarbonate for 3 hours at room temperature. The tissue was rinsed several times with distilled water, dehydrated in ethanol and placed in Samdri-790 (Tousimis Research Corporation) for Critical point drying. After the drying process, the tissues were placed on the holding platforms and processed for metal coating on Sputter Coater (SPI Sputter). SEM observations and recordings were done on NeoScope JCM-5000 microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Inflorescence and Floral Organogenesis in TK

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The developmental process of inflorescence and floral organogenesis were observed under a stereomicroscope and a scanning electron microscope. The selected plants described above (collected at 5, 10, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, and 33 DAG) were dissected using a Leica S6D stereomicroscope and fixed in FAA (37% formaldehyde/glacial acetic acid/95% ethanol/dH2O, 10:5:50:35, v/v) at least over night at room temperature [51 ]. Samples were then dehydrated for 15 min in each of the following concentrations 50%, 70%, and 90% ethanol (1×/ea.) and 100% ethanol (3×) at room temperature [34 (link)]. Critical point drying was obtained (Samdri-790, Tousimis Research Corporation, Rockville, MD, USA) mounted on aluminum stubs and platinum coated. One hundred and five plants were sampled, and their inflorescences observed and imaged using scanning electron microscopy (Hitachi S-3500N, Tokyo, Japan) under high vacuum.
To evaluate the timing of inflorescence development and floral organogenesis, a total of 98 plants were evaluated considering the developmental stage of the oldest inflorescence in the plant. The developmental stage was assigned according to the nine stages proposed herein for inflorescence development in TK.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Macrophages grown on coverslips were treated as indicated and processed for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using a method described previously (37 (link)). Briefly, cells were fixed in SEM fixative (4% paraformaldehyde, 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate solution) overnight at 4 °C. Cells were dehydrated through a graded ethanol series (25%−100%) and critical point drying was performed (Tousimis Samdri-790, Rockville, MD, USA). Coverslips were mounted onto aluminum stubs, sputter coated with 3.5 nm of gold/palladium (Anatek USA-Hummer, Union City, CA) and imaged at 20 KV using a Philips XL30 scanning electron microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Gram Staining and SEM Imaging of GBS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Coverslips with GBS overnight culture were air-dried, heat fixed, and then subjected to a standard Gram stain protocol. Images were taken using a Zeiss upright microscope with an attached Axiocam Icc3 camera. For electron microscopy, 1mL (107 CFU) of bacterial cells suspended in PBS was fixed in a cocktail of 2% gluteraldehyde and 1% osmium tetroxide in PBS for 10 minutes. The solution was then passed through a 0.4μm polycarbonate filter to collect bacterial cells and rinsed with 4mL of water. In order to dry the samples, the filters were taken through a series of increasing concentrations of ethanol (50, 75, 85, 95, 100%) before being placed in a Tousimis SAMDRI-790 critical point drying machine. The dried filters were mounted onto SEM sample stubs with a piece of double-sided carbon tape before applying a 6nm layer of platinum with a Quorom Q150ts high-resolution coater. Samples were viewed using an FEI FEG450 scanning electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

SEM Imaging of Pancreatic ECM Hydrogels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To obtain SEM images, cell-seeded pancreatic ECM hydrogels were first fixed in a 2% (v/v) glutaraldehyde solution (Millipore Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA) at day 14 of the culture. Samples were then dehydrated using ethanol, dried using the critical point drying (CPD) method with a Tousimis Samdri 790 machine (Tousimis Research, Rockville, MD, USA) and sputter coated with 6 nm Au-Pd with an EMS 150T ES machine (Quorum Technologies, Sacramento, CA, USA). SEM images were acquired using a Schottky Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (Joel JSM 7900F Peabody, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Macrophage Surface Ruffles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Macrophages were fixed (4% paraformaldehyde, 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate solution) overnight at 4 °C. Then cells were dehydrated through a graded ethanol series (25%–100%) and washed with 100% ethanol before critical point drying (Tousimis Samdri-790, Rockville, MD). Coverslips were mounted onto aluminum stubs and sputter coated with 3.5 nm of gold/palladium (Anatek USA-Hummer, Union City, CA). Cell were imaged at 20 KV using a Philips XL30 scanning electron microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, OR.) The number of ruffles on the surface of Cre/Nf1f/fand Cre+/Nf1f/fmacrophages were visually quantified and normalized to total cell number.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Cryptococcus Biofilms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cryptococcus sp. biofilms were grown on glass coverslips in microtiter plates with RPMI-1621 for 72 h. Coverslips with biofilms were then washed three times with PBS and transferred to another microtiter plate containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde and incubated for 48 h at 4°C. The samples were serially dehydrated in alcohol, fixed in a critical-point drier (Samdri-790; Tousimis, Rockville, MD, USA), coated with gold-palladium (Desk-1; Denton Vacuum, Inc., Cherry Hill, NJ, USA), and viewed with a JEOL (Tokyo, Japan) JSM-6400 scanning electron microscope at a voltage of 10.0 kV; the image was captured at 10,000×.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Oral Veil Papillae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For tissue isolations, anesthetized animals were secured on a Sylgard-coated plate in chilled ASW. Papillae 2–3 mm in length and tentacle tips were excised from the OV and relaxed in MgCl2 (0.33 M, 10 mM HEPES, pH = 8.0) for three hours prior to fixation. Papillae were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M PBS at pH 7.6 for 4 hours at room temperature and washed for 2 hours in 2.5% sodium bicarbonate. A secondary fixation was for 3 hours at room temperature in 2% osmium tetroxide in 1.25% sodium bicarbonate. Tissues were next rinsed 3X in distilled water and dehydrated in ethanol. For critical point drying we used the Samdri-790 (Tousimis Research Corporation). After drying, tissues were processed for metal coating on Sputter Coater (SPI Sputter) using the gold/palladium target. SEM analyses and photographs were done on a NeoScope JCM-5000 microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). In all, seven groups of oral veil tissues were processed independently through fixation, drying, metal coating and imaging, each containing between 6 and 10 papillae-containing pieces dissected from the oral veils of two healthy adult Pleurobranchaea.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!