The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sensifast cdna synthesis kit

Manufactured by Meridian Bioscience
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States, Australia, Germany, Canada, Italy, Spain

The SensiFAST cDNA Synthesis Kit is a laboratory product designed for the reverse transcription of RNA into complementary DNA (cDNA). The kit provides the necessary reagents and components to efficiently convert RNA into cDNA, which is a crucial step in various molecular biology techniques, such as gene expression analysis and quantitative PCR.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

705 protocols using sensifast cdna synthesis kit

1

RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA from cell lines was extracted with the ISOLATE II RNA Mini Kit (Bioline, Sydney, Australia) and any residual genomic DNA contamination was removed by on-column DNAse I treatment for 15 min. RNA was eluted in 50 µL RNase-free H2O. RNA quality and quantity were measured using the NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). cDNA synthesis was performed from 1 µg total RNA with the SensiFAST cDNA Synthesis kit (Bioline, Sydney, Australia). Total RNA from IsoFlux CTC samples or healthy control PBMCs was extracted with the RNA purification Micro kit (Norgen Biotek Corp., Thorold, ON, Canada) and double-eluted in a total volume of 30 µL RNase-free H2O. 15 µL of this RNA was converted into cDNA with the SensiFAST cDNA Synthesis kit (Bioline). Healthy donor PBMCs consisted of 4000 cells to mimic IsoFlux CTC samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative PCR Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated from the cultured cells using the innuPREP RNA Mini Kit (Analytik Jena). RNA concentration was quantified using a NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and cDNA was synthesized using the SensiFAST cDNA synthesis kit (Bioline GmbH). SensiFAST SYBR No-ROX (Roche) reagent together with gene-specific primers (Table S2 of supporting information 1) were used for gene expression quantification. PCR products of each gene were initially cloned in the pGEM-T vector (Promega) and sequenced to verify the specificity of the primer pairs before analysis. Five different dilutions of cloned plasmids were used as standards and amplified together with cDNA samples in each run. The PCR amplification was performed in duplicates for each sample by taking 2.5 and 5 μl of cDNA in a total volume of 12 μl of reaction mix using a Light Cycler 96 instrument (Roche). PCR amplicon was verified for each run using melting curve analysis and agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of PD-L1 Transcript Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA from 2×107 cells was isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands) and cDNA was generated by the reverse transcription on CFX96 real-time system (BioRad) using SensiFAST cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bioline, London, UK). Template RNA and resulting cDNA quality and concentration were assessed on an ND-1000 Nanodrop system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The relative amount of PD-L1 transcript variants was measured by real-time PCR using SensiFAST SYBR N-ROX Kit (Bioline) and calculated using Bio-Rad CFX Manager Software. Primers were designed to target the exon 2/3 boundary (v1), or exon 1/3 boundary (v2) of PD-L1 transcript variant 1 (NM_014143.3), as we described previously [37 (link)]. The sequences of the primer pairs were the following: variant 1 forward ATGGTGGTGCCGACTACAAG, variant 1 reverse GGAATTGGTGGTGGTGGTCT, variant 2 forward TTGCTGAACGCCCCATACAA, variant 2 reverse TCCAGATGACTTCGGCCTTG. For the relative quantification by 2−ΔΔCt method, GAPDH expression was measured as a reference, using GAAACTGTGGCGTGATGGC and CCGTTCAGCTCAGGGATGAC as the forward and reverse primers, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Parasite Burden in Macrophage Infections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human MDMs and J774 macrophages were infected with L. major stationary-phase promastigotes at a parasite-to-cell ratio of 10-to-1, for 4 h, after which non-internalized parasites were removed through extensive washing in PBS. Cells were then treated with a TDO-specific inhibitor (680C91, Sigma Aldrich) at a concentration of 20 μM, previously determined as non-toxic for both parasite and cells, or DMSO (vehicle). At 48 h after incubation at, cells were lysed in 800 μL of TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific. RNA was purified and reverse transcription and quantitative PCR using SensiFAST cDNA synthesis kit (Bioline) followed by a qPCR (SensiFAST SYBR Hi-ROX kit, Bioline). For gene amplification, mixtures were composed of SensiFAST buffer (2X, Bioline) and 200 nM of forward and reverse primer. Assays were performed in 10 μl reactions volume with 15 ng of cDNA sample. Thermocycling settings consisted of one hold of 2 min at 95°C followed by a two-step temperature (95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 30 s) over 40 cycles in a CFX384 touch real time PCR detection system (Bio-rad). To calculate the relative intracellular parasite growth between DMSO-treated and TDO-inhibitor treated cells, we quantified the parasite-specific transcripts KMP11 and RRNA45, using GAPDH and RPS18 as host reference genes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

RT-qPCR Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA (500 ng) isolated from cells or tissues with TRIsure (Bioline) and SV Total RNA Isolation System (Promega GmbH) was reverse transcribed with SensiFast cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bioline). Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed in 12.5 μl using the SensiMix SYBR No-ROX Kit (Bioline) in the LightCycler 480 instrument II (Roche). Gene expression of target genes was normalized to the housekeeper gene general transcription factor II B (Gtf2b). Primers are listed in Supplementary Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative PCR Validation of RNA-seq

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
qPCR assays were performed to confirm the RNA-seq results. One microgram of total RNA from each sample (the same samples as for RNA-seq) was used to synthesize cDNA using a SensiFAST cDNA synthesis kit according to the manufacturer’s instruction (Bioline, Inc. Cincinnati, OH, USA). The SensiFAST SYBR No-ROX kit was used for qPCR using a BIO-RAD CFX384 real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad laboratories), in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocols. The data were collected from three biological and three technical replications. Initially, we tested 5 reference genes including 18SrRNA, Elongation factor [Ef1α], GAPDH, Initiation factor [IF4a] and ACTIN. GAPDH was selected and used as a reference gene to normalize the relative quantities of the target genes because of its consistency across different time points and genotypes. The comparative CT method was used for quantification of gene expression, and fold change was calculated using 2−∆∆CT [94 (link)]. The list of the selected genes and primers used for validation are listed in Table S11.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Intestinal Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intestinal tissues were collected and immediately stored in RNALater (Life Technologies). After removal of the RNALater, the tissues were homogenized using Trizol (Life Technologies) and 1.0-mm silicon carbide beads (Biospec Products) on the Precellys 24 at 4000 rpm for 30 s, three times. After centrifugation, the supernatant was collected and RNA extraction performed using a Direct-zol RNA purification kit (Zymo Research). cDNA was synthesized from tissue RNA (Sensifast cDNA synthesis kit, Bioline) and real-time PCR used the SensiFast SYBR Lo-ROX Kit (Bioline) on a ViiA7 real-time PCR system (Life Technologies). Data were analyzed in duplicates using the delta-delta Ct method, with HPRT as the housekeeping gene. Primers used are shown in Table 1.

Primers for qRT-PCR

IL-10′5-CAGGGATCTTAGCTAACGGAAA-3′
′5-GCTCAGTGAATAAATAGAATGGGAAC-3′
IL-22′5-ATGAGTTTTTCCCTTATGGGGAC-3′
′5-GCTGGAAGTTGGACACCTCAA-3′
HPRT′5-CCTAAGATGAGCGCAAGTTGAA-3′
′5-CCACAGGACTAGAACACCTGCTAA-3′
Lysoyzme P′5-ATGGCTACCGTGGTGTCA-3′
′5-CGGTCTCCACGGTTGTAGTT-3′
Cryptdin′5-AAGAGACTAAAACTGAGGAGCAGC-3′
′5-GGTGATCATGAGACCCCAGCATCAGT-3′
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

RNA Extraction and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from synchronized L3 and day-1 adult animals. Protocols for RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis and qPCR were described earlier7 . Briefly, total RNA was extracted using Trizol (Thermo Fisher, USA). The RNA was used to prepare cDNA and, subsequently, perform qPCR using the SensiFast cDNA synthesis kit (Bioline, USA), and SYBR green mix (Bio-Rad, Canada), respectively. Primers are listed in Table S4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of Salt Tolerance Genes in Rice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative real time PCR was conducted according to Liu et al. [109 (link)] to measure the gene expression of key transporters related to salt tolerance in rice. Total RNA from rice leaves was extracted in the 4th week after stress application using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and reverse transcription was performed using a SensiFAST cDNA synthesis kit (Bioline, London, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The expression of genes (HAK1, NHX1, HKT1;4, SOS1, and VHA-c) known to be involved with salt tolerance was assessed by real-time quantitative RT-PCR using a Quantinova Sybr Green Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) in a Rotor-Gene 3000 quantitative PCR thermocycler (Corbett Research, Mortlake, NSW, Australia). G6PDH and Elfa were used as reference genes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cloning and Mutagenesis of WSB1 Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genomic DNA fragment spanning from exon 5 to exon 6 of WSB1 gene was cloned into pcDNA3.1(+) plasmid and deletion mutants were generated by mutagenesis cloning using PrimeSTAR Max DNA Polymerase (Takara). Minigene plasmids were transfected into cells using lipofectamine 2000. After 48 h total RNA was purified using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) with RNAse-Free DNase Set (Qiagen) to digest contaminating DNA. Reverse transcription was performed using SensiFAST™ cDNA synthesis kit (Bioline) and PCR was performed using pcDNA3.1(+) forward and reverse primers by exTEN 2× PCR Master Mix (Axil Scientific). Primer sequences are listed in Supplementary data 7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!