The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Api coryne test

Manufactured by bioMérieux
Sourced in France

The API Coryne test is a biochemical identification system used for the identification of Corynebacterium and other Gram-positive, catalase-positive bacteria. It provides a standardized procedure for the identification of these bacteria through a series of enzymatic and biochemical tests.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using api coryne test

1

Isolation and Identification of Trueperella pyogenes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thirty-seven T. pyogenes strains isolated from various animal hosts and different suppurative infections were used in this study (12 from goats, 8 from cattle, 8 from pigs, 2 from sheep, and 7 from European bison). All strains were selected from the strain collection of the Division of Microbiology, Department of Preclinical Sciences, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (an origin and a source of strains are shown in Figure 3 and Table S2 of Supplementary Materials). The studied strains were isolated from individual animals from different farms, with the exception of nine strains originating from three goats (strains 28/K, 30/K, 31/K, 34/K, strains 26/K, 27/K and strains 21/K, 22/K, 54/K were isolated from the goat 3, the goat 2 and the goat 1, respectively). All strains were identified using the API Coryne test (BioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) and also by the species-specific plo gene PCR, as described previously [23 (link),24 (link)].
Bacteria were cultured on Columbia Agar supplemented with 5% sheep blood (Graso Biotech, Starogard Gdański, Poland) at 37 °C under microaerophilic conditions for 48 h. Then, a pure culture of each strain was prepared on Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB; BioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France), and after 24 h incubation, it was used for a template DNA extraction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Rapid Diphtheria Identification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We cultured collected swab specimens on tellurite-containing agar medium in a 35°C incubator for 24‒48 hours (3 ). If black colonies grew, we initially tested them by Gram stain to identify gram-positive bacilli (3 ). We used the API Coryne Test (bioMérieux, https://www.biomerieux.com) to identify species and biovars for each subculture (3 ). We tested subcultures for expression of the diphtheria toxin by using the modified Elek test (24 (link)).
We conducted quadruplex, real-time, reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) directly on throat swab specimens and aliquots of skim milk, tryptone, glucose, and glycerin medium to identify C.diphtheriae, C.ulcerans, or C. pseudotuberculosis and the diphtheria toxin gene according to published methods (3 ,25 (link)). DNA was extracted by using the QIAmp DNA Extraction Kit (QIAGEN, https://www.qiagen.com) (26 (link)). Primers and probes targeted 2 rpoB genes, the tox gene, and the green fluorescent protein gene (gfp), which we used as internal positive controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Biotyping and Toxigenicity of Corynebacterium

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The isolates were biotyped using the API Coryne test (BioMerieux, France) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Toxigenicity was determined by conventional and modified Elek tests according to the WHO manual [12 ]. The presence of the diphtheria toxin gene was investigated by PCR as described previously [13 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Biochemical Identification and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Catalase activity was tested by API® ID color catalase (Biomérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). Coagulase activity was determined by BD BBL™ Rabbit Coagulase Plasma (BD, Sparks, MD, USA) (35 °C, overnight). DNase activity was evaluated using DNase agar containing toluidine blue (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Oxidase activity was determined using BD BBL™ Oxidase Reagent Droppers (BD, Sparks, MD, USA). Motility was evaluated using BBL™ Motility Test Medium (BD, Sparks, MD, USA). The urease activity was determined using a urease agar slant (Creative Life Science Co., Ltd., New Taipei City, Taiwan). The ability of the cells to utilize various sources of carbon and their enzyme activity were evaluated using the API bacterial identification systems APIStaph, ID32, and the API Coryne test (Biomérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France), following the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!