The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using cytof system

1

Comprehensive Kidney Immune Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the kidney samples were processed in the same batch. CyTOF analysis was performed by PLTTech, Inc. (Hangzhou, China) according to a published protocol [12 (link)]. The kidney tissue was dissociated into a single-cell suspension with a mixture of DNase I, collagenase IV, and hyaluronidase (Sigma-Aldrich). Immune cells were enriched using Percoll density gradient media (Sigma-Aldrich), and erythrocytes were fully removed using ACK Lysing Buffer (Sigma-Aldrich). Qualified samples were blocked and stained with a mixed panel of surface antibodies, followed by overnight fixation. After fixing with Fix & Perm Buffer (Fluidigm), the cells were incubated in an intracellular antibody mix. The signals of the stained cells were detected using a CyTOF system (Fluidigm). The types of immune cells were identified via nonlinear dimensionality reduction (t-SNE), followed by density clustering.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Single-Cell CyTOF Analysis of NSCLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eight fresh early stage NSCLC samples were obtained from the Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University. The detailed clinical characteristics of the samples were shown in Supplementary Table 1. After washing by the RPMI 1640 medium, the fresh lung tumor samples were then dissociated into single cells under Deoxyribonuclease and Collagenase type IV exposure. ACK Lysing Buffer (PLT) was used to remove the erythrocyte, the amounts of viable and dead cells were then counted to provide a preliminary estimate of the sampling efficiency. Cell-ID™ Cisplatin-194Pt (Fluidigm) was used to specifically identify dead cells; next, qualified samples were blocked on ice for 20 minutes. Without removing the blocking solution, samples were incubated with a surface antibody mix (Maxpar® Antibody Labeling Kit, Fluidigm) for 30 minutes on ice. With Maxpar® Fix and Perm Buffer, an eventual 500μM DNA intercalator (Cell-ID™ Intercalator-Ir, Fluidigm) were incubated with the washed 200uL re-suspended cells per sample overnight at 4°C. Subsequently, intracellular staining was performed. After washing, pre-fixing, and 30 minutes of co-incubation with intracellular antibody mix on ice, cells were then rinsed and subsequently obtained in the CyTOF system (Helios, Fluidigm) to detect the signals. For the detailed procedures, please refer to the reported protocol (34 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Tumor Immune Profiling by CyTOF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immune cells were collected from KPC tumors using the method detailed in Section Tumor Immune Microenvironment Assay using Flow Cytometry. Immune cells were labeled using antibodies with metal tags. The mixed antibody panel consisted of 42 antibodies conjugated with different metals (Table S1, Supporting Information). The metal signals were detected to evaluate the expression of the conjugated target molecule using the CyTOF system (Helios, Fluidigm, San Francisco, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

CyTOF Sample Acquisition and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The barcoded samples were loaded onto a Helios CyTOF system using an attached autosampler and were acquired at a rate of 200–400 events per sec. Data were collected as .FCS files using CyTOF software (Version 6.7.1014, Fluidigm). After acquisition, intrafile signal drift was normalized to the acquired calibration bead signal and individual files were deconvoluted and stored into .fcs files using CyTOF software. File clean-up (e.g., removal of dead cells, debris, doublets, and beads) was performed using Gemstone software (Verity Software House).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

CyTOF Sample Preparation for Helios Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed with 3 mL of MaxPar® cell staining buffer and centrifugated at 800x g for 5 min followed by a 2x wash with 4 mL MaxPar® Water (Fluidigm, South San Francisco, California). Before introduction into the Helios™, a CyTOF® System (Fluidigm, South San Francisco, California), pelleted cells were re-suspended with MaxPar® Water containing EQ™ Four Element Calibration Beads (Fluidigm, South San Francisco, California) and filtered using a 12 × 75 mm tube with a 35 μm nylon mesh cell-strainer cap (Corning, New York).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Tumor Immune Profiling by CyTOF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The immune cells in KPC‐bearing mice tumors were further analyzed by Mass cytometry (CyTOF). The methods of obtaining immune cells from tumor tissues are the same as mentioned in section “Tumor Immune Microenvironment Assay by Flow Cytometry.” The immune cells were incubated with an in‐house developed panel of mixed antibodies according to the standard protocol. The mixed antibody panel consists of 42 antibodies conjugated to different metals (Table S1, Supporting Information). After incubation, the CyTOF system (Helios, Fluidigm, San Francisco, CA, USA) was used to detect the metal signals to evaluate the expression of the conjugated target molecule. The types of immune cell were subjected to density clustering after they were identified using nonlinear dimensionality reduction [t‐distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t‐SNE)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multi-Omics Profiling of Lung Tumor Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After washing with RPMI 1640 medium, the fresh lung tumor samples were dissociated into single cells under the irradiation of deoxyribonuclease and type IV collagenase. ACK lysis buffer (PLT) was used to remove the red blood cells, and the number of live and dead cells was then counted to estimate the sampling efficiency. Cell-ID cisplatin 194Pt (Fluidigm) was used to identify the dead cells, after which block qualified samples were placed on ice for 20 min. Each sample was then incubated on ice for 30 min, with the surface antibody mixture (Maxpar Antibody Labeling Kit; Fluidigm) and without removing the blocking solution, using Maxpar Fix and Perm Buffer. The final 500 μMNA intercalator (Cell-ID Intercalator-Ir; Fluidigm) was incubated with 200 μl after the resuspended cells were washed in each sample and finally stored overnight at 4°C. Subsequently, intracellular staining was performed, the cells were washed with the intracellular antibody mixture on ice, pre-fixed, and co-incubated for 30 min. Then the cells were rinsed and then collected on the CyTOF system (Helios; Fluidigm) to detect the signal (Han et al., 2018 (link)). Antibody selection is shown in Supplementary Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

CyTOF Profiling of Mouse Liver Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CyTOF analysis was performed by PLTTech Inc. (Hangzhou, China) according to the protocol described previously.
33 (link) In brief, mouse liver tissue was dissociated into single cells with DNAase, collagenase IV, and hyaluronidase (Sigma‐Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). Immune cells were concentrated using Percoll density gradient media (Sigma‐Aldrich), while red blood cells were removed using ACK Lysing Buffer (Sigma‐Aldrich). Qualified samples were gathered in blocks and stained for 30 min with a panel of 42 antibodies, followed by overnight fixation. Permeabilisation buffer was applied, and the cells were incubated in an intracellular antibody mixture. The cells were rinsed, and the signals were detected using a CyTOF system (Helios, Fluidigm, South San Francisco, CA, USA). The types of immune cells were identified via nonlinear dimensionality reduction (viSNE) followed by density‐based clustering.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!