The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sigma scanning electron microscope

Manufactured by Zeiss
Sourced in Germany

The Sigma scanning electron microscope by Zeiss is a versatile instrument designed for high-resolution imaging and analysis of a wide range of materials. It utilizes a focused electron beam to scan the surface of a sample, generating detailed images that reveal the topography and composition of the specimen at the nanoscale level. The Sigma provides excellent resolution and imaging capabilities, making it a valuable tool for various scientific and industrial applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

22 protocols using sigma scanning electron microscope

1

SEM Imaging of Photonic Chips

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Zeiss Sigma scanning electron microscope (SEM, Carl Zeiss AG, Jena, Germany) was used to image the fabricated photonic chips. Imaging was carried out to compare the designed dimensions to the fabricated structures and identify any fabrication limitations or unexpected effects. In-lens and secondary electron detectors were used to take top-view and angled-view (45° tilt) images of the photonic devices. ImageJ was used to measure the dimensions of the fabricated SWG waveguides on top-view SEM images taken at 50,000× magnification. For each geometrical parameter (w, Λ, δ, and wfb), five measurements were taken and then averaged to give a more representative estimation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Multimodal Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescence spectra were measured by LS55 fluorescence spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer). Absorption spectra of Ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) were recorded using Lambda-35 UV-vis spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer). The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images were analyzed using JEM-1400Plus transmission electron microscope (Japan Electron Optics Laboratory Co., Ltd). Zeta potentials for CDs were evaluated by zetasizer (Nano ZSE, Malvern Instruments, UK). VG Multilab 2000 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was gathered by surface analysis. Optical density (OD) in the cell was calculated using microplate reader (Thermo Scientific, England, UK). The circular dichroism spectra were gathered using Chirascan Plus spectropolarimeter (Applied Photophysics Ltd.). Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images for bacteria were conducted using Zeiss SIGMA scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss Jena). Fluorescence optical microscope (Nikon ECLIPSE Ti) was applied on images through laser-scanning confocal fluorescence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of SNAP-Matrix Grafts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FTIR spectra of selected NO releasing (10% (w/w) SNAP-matrix—10% (w/w) SNAP-MWCNTs-OH) and control (non-loaded matrix—non-loaded MWCNTs-OH) grafts for biological studies was measured from 400 to 4000 cm−1 with a Bruker Vertex 70 spectrometer (Bruker Optics, Evere, Belgium). Coated and non-coated 3D printed tubes were mounted on SEM-supporting stubs with silver paint, and sputter-coated with 10 nm chromium with a Leica ACE600 coating machine (Leica-Microsystems GmbH, Vienna, Austria). The specimens’ morphology was visualized using a SE-detector of a Zeiss Sigma scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany) at the acceleration voltage of 2 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Titanium Nitride Nanotubes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TiNTs were prepared by a classical hydrothermal method and characterized as described previously.22 (link) TiNTs powder was appropriately suspended in pure water (0.1 mg mL−1), then ultrasonicated for 5 min. A sample of 20 μL was observed using a transmission electron microscope (TEM, Tecnai G2, FEI, Netherlands) at 200 kV and images were acquired with a Veleta camera (Olympus, Japan). TiNTs powder was also characterized by SEM using a ZEISS Sigma scanning electron microscope (SEM) with a 10 kV accelerating voltage. For crystallinity, X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed at room temperature with an X-ray diffractometer (X′ Pert PRO MPD, PANalytical Co., Holland). Monochromatic Cu Kα-radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) was obtained with Ni-filtration and a system of diverging and receiving slides of 0.5° and 0.1 mm, respectively. The diffraction pattern was measured at a voltage of 40 kV and a current of 30 mA over a 2θ range of 3–40° using a step size of 0.02° at a scan speed of 1 s per step.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Automated Imaging of Sectioned Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cured blocks were trimmed as previously described (Hildebrand, et al., 2017 (link)) and ~30nm sections were automatically collected using a custom tape collection device (ATUM) (Hayworth, et al., 2014 (link)) mounted to a commercial ultramicrotome. Sections were collected and post-stained as published (Hildebrand, et al., 2017 (link)). Images were acquired using back-scatter detection with a Sigma scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss) equipped with the ATLAS software (Fibics). Custom made algorithms were used for non-affine alignment, and volume annotation and segmentation were performed with VAST (Berger, et al., 2018 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Analytical Techniques for Material Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed on a JEOL electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 100 kV. High-angle annular dark-field scanning TEM (HAADF-STEM), HAADF-STEM energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (HAADF-STEM-EDS), and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) were performed on an FEI Tecnai F30 transmission electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 300 kV. Scanning electron microscopy EDS (SEM-EDS) was conducted on a ZEISS Sigma scanning electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV. Inductively coupled plasma optical spectroscopy (ICP-OES) was carried out on a Thermo Fisher iCAP700 series (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA) in axial mode. X-ray diffraction spectroscopy (XRD) was conducted on a Rigaku XRD machine with Cu Kα (λ = 1.540598 Å). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was conducted on an SSI S-Probe XPS spectrometer. The XANES and EXAFS spectra were measured in transmission mode by using the TPS 44A beamline at the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Centre (NSRRC, Hsinchu).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
These data (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 1) were collected via energy-dispersive spectroscopy on a Carl Zeiss Sigma scanning electron microscope at the University of Glasgow. Samples were carbon-coated, and the electron microscope was operated in high-vacuum mode at 20 kV and ~ 2 nA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Electron Microscopy of Mouse Renal Cortex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For electron microscopy, a small piece of mouse renal cortex was immersion fixed in 4% PFA and 1% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M PB. After post-fixation (same fixative o/n at 4 °C), tissue blocks were washed in 0.1 M PB, treated with OsO4 (0.5% for 60 min), and stained with uranyl acetate (1% w/v in 70% v/v ethanol). After dehydration, tissue blocks were embedded in Araldite resin (Serva Electrophoresis GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). Eighty nanometer ultrathin sections were cut on an UC6 ultramicrotome (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany), rinsed in lead citrate buffer before analysis using a Zeiss Sigma scanning electron microscope using a STEM detector (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Serial Ultrathin Sections Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The resin-embedded sections were cut into 30 nm serial ultrathin sections using automated tape-collecting ultramicrotome (ATUM) 86 (link). Serial sections were collected onto carbon-coated and plasma-treated Kapton tape. The tape was cut into strips and affixed onto 150 mm silicon wafers (University Wafer).
A Zeiss Sigma scanning electron microscope was used to acquire overview images from the serial sections. Two overview images were taken per wafer, which were around 1.35 μm apart in z-axis. Typical imaging conditions are 8-kV landing energy, 1.2-nA beam current, 3-μs dwell time, 150-nm pixel size, and 4k × 4k images. The images were captured using a below-the-lens backscatter detector and Zeiss’ Atlas 5 software. The overview images were aligned using the “Linear stack alignment with SIFT” plugin in FIJI.
Prior to acquiring high-resolution images, the serial section sections on wafers were post-stained for 4 min with a 3% lead citrate solution. After staining, the sections were degassed for a minimum of 24 h at 1×10–6 Torr. A Zeiss MultiSEM 505 scanning electron microscope equipped with 61 electron beams was used to acquire high-resolution images from the serial sections. Images were collected using a 1.5-kV landing energy, 4-nm image pixel, and a 400-ns dwell time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Preparing Cortical Samples for SEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After micro-CT imaging, we bisected a brain sample with a bandsaw and machined a 7 mm × 7 mm × 20 mm block of cortex from one hemisphere. We mounted the block onto the chuck of a Leica EM UC-7 Ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL), trimmed down the machining damage with a diamond knife and reduced the face to a 1 mm × 2 mm rectangle with a 400 μm setback. We then collected 30 nm sections onto carbon-coated Kapton tape with an automated tape-collecting ultramicrotome (ATUM)49 . The tape with the sections was mounted to silicon wafers and we then post-stained the sections with 1% uranyl acetate in maleate buffer and 3% stabilized lead citrate (Ultrostain II, Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany). We imaged the sections on a Zeiss Sigma scanning electron microscope and acquired images using secondary electron detection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!