The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using isogen lysis buffer

1

Microarray Analysis of RNA Profiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA of 60As6, 60As6Luc, HSC-60, and HSC-60Luc cells was isolated by suspending the cells in an ISOGEN lysis buffer (Nippon Gene, Toyama, Japan) followed by isopropanol precipitation. We conducted microarray analyses twice by using Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). The procedures were conducted according to the suppliers’ protocols. The arrays were scanned with a GeneChip Scanner 3000 (Affymetrix), and the data were analyzed by Microarray Suite version 5.0 with Affymetrix default analysis settings and global scaling as normalization method. The trimmed mean target intensity of each array was arbitrarily set to 1000. All the microarray data have been deposited in a MIAME compliant database, GEO; accession number GSE53276. By a 2-fold change, 684 genes were selected as specific genes for 60As6 and 60As6Luc cells, and 1150 genes were selected for HSC-60 and HSC-60Luc cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive RNA Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated by suspending the cells in an ISOGEN lysis buffer (Nippon Gene, Toyama, Japan) followed by precipitation with isopropanol. Reverse transcription was carried out by SuperScript III First‐Stand Synthesis System (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). PCR was carried out by AccuPrime Taq DNA Polymerase System (Invitrogen) within the linear range of amplification, typically 19‐30 cycles, for all splicing isoforms of SIM2, long isoform of SIM2, short isoform of SIM2 (SIM2s), ARNT, ARNT2, FN1, VIM, SNAI2, TWIST1, PDPN, SPRR1A, FLG and ACTB. Quantitative real‐time PCR was carried out for long isoform of SIM2, ARNT, ARNT2, VIM, PDPN, SPRR1A, FLG, FANCD2, BRCA1, BARD1, XRCC5, SOD2 and ACTB by a Bio‐Rad iCycler with iQ Syber Green Supermix (Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Results are presented as linearized Ct values normalized to the housekeeping ACTB and the indicated reference value (2−ΔΔCt). Primers used for the study are listed in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Semi-Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from tissues or suspending cells using ISOGEN lysis buffer (Nippon Gene), followed by precipitation with isopropanol. As described in our previous report [29 (link)], semi-quantitative RT-PCR was carried out using primer sets (Table S1). For semi-quantitative RT-PCR, we showed data within linear range by performing 25–30 cycles of PCR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Gene Expression Analysis by RT-PCR and qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from cells in an ISOGEN lysis buffer (Nippon Gene, Toyama, Japan) followed by precipitation with isopropanol. Reverse transcription was carried out by SuperScript III First-Stand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen, CA, USA). PCR was carried out by AccuPrimeTaq DNA Polymerase System (Invitrogen, CA, USA). RT-PCR was performed within the linear range of amplification, typically 19–30 cycles, for SIM2, HIF1A, TP63, PTGS2, EGFR, ERBB2, TGFB1, ITGB3, and GAPDH. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed on HIF1A, VEGFA, HK2, PDK1, DDIT4, SLC2A, LDHA, BNIP3, NOS2, PDGFB, FGF2, NDUFA4L2, EPO, SLC16A3, MDR1, SIM2, and GAPDH by a Bio-Rad iCycler with iQSyber Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA sequences of used primers are listed in Supplementary Table S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

ESCC Chemoradiotherapy Response Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) specimens were provided by the National Cancer Center Hospital and National Cancer Center Hospital East, after obtaining written informed consent from each patient and approval by the National Cancer Center Institutional Review Board. Patients received definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) treatment: protracted infusion of 5-FU 800 to 1000 mg/m2/24 hours on days 1 to 4 and 29 to 32, a 2-hour infusion of CDDP 75 to 80 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29, and concurrent radiation therapy at a dose of 50.4 to 60 Gy. After the completion of CRT, responders additionally received two courses of chemotherapy every 4 weeks. Treatment response was evaluated 8 weeks after CRT. For the biopsy samples, tumor portions (about 2 mm X 2 mm) of patients before and after (3–4 weeks) treatment were obtained under endoscopy from a margin of the tumor by exclusion of any central necrotic lesions to obtain viable cancer cells. All biopsy samples were immediately exposed to ISOGEN lysis buffer (Nippon Gene Co., Ltd., Toyama, Japan) or frozen with liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C until use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Microarray Analysis of Gastric Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated by suspending the cells in an ISOGEN lysis buffer (Nippon Gene, Toyama, Japan) followed by precipitation with isopropanol. We used Human Expression Array U95A version 2 (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) for analysis of mRNA expression levels corresponding to 12,600 transcripts. The procedures were conducted according to the suppliers’ protocols. The expression value (average difference: AD) of each gene was calculated using GeneChip Analysis Suite version 4.0 software (Affymetrix). The mean of AD values in each experiment was 1000 to reliably compare variable multiple arrays. Hierarchical clustering is widely used as one of the unsupervised learning methods. Hierarchical clustering of microarray data was performed by the use of GeneSpring (Agilent Technologies Ltd., Palo Alto, CA), Microsoft EXCEL, and Cluster & TreeView software [29 (link)]. All the microarray data have been deposited in a MIAME compliant database, GEO; the accession number GSE47007. By Wilcoxon u-test (p<0.05) and a 2-fold change, 188 genes were selected as specific genes for 18 intestinal-type GCs, and 704 genes were selected as specific genes for 12 diffuse-type GCs. The results of a two-dimensional hierarchical clustering analysis of the 892 selected genes are shown.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

High-Fidelity mRNA Amplification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For total RNA isolation, surgical specimens and esophageal epithelial cells of mice were lysed by ISOGEN lysis buffer (Nippon Gene, Toyama, Japan), extracted with chloroform, and precipitated with a glycogen carrier in isopropanol. The mRNA was amplified by an efficient method of high‐fidelity mRNA amplification developed by us, called TALPAT (T7RNA polymerase promoter‐attached, adaptor ligation mediated, and PCR amplification followed by in vitro T7‐transcription).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Gene expression profiling of Uc.63+ in MKN-1 cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA from MKN-1 cells with forced expression of Uc.63+ and its control was isolated by lysing cells in Isogen lysis buffer (Nippon Gene) and further purified with RNeasy MinElute CleanUp Kit (QIAGEN). We performed microarray analyses using the Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The arrays were scanned with a GeneChip Scanner 3000 (Affymetrix), and the data were analyzed by Microarray Suite version 5.0 with Affymetrix default analysis settings and global scaling as the normalization method. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) (http://www.broad insti tute.org/gsea) was also applied for the analysis and validation of the gene expression profiles.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genome-wide gene expression profiling of diffuse-type gastric cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated by suspending the cells in ISOGEN lysis buffer (Nippon Gene, Toyama, Japan) followed by precipitation with isopropanol. We performed expression analyses using Human Expression Array U95A version 2 (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) according to the suppliers’ protocols . The expression value (average difference: AD) of each gene was calculated using GeneChip Analysis Suite version 4.0 software (Affymetrix). Hierarchical clustering of microarray data was performed using GeneSpring (Agilent Technologies Ltd., Palo Alto, CA), Microsoft EXCEL, and Cluster & TreeView [22 , 23 (link)]. All microarray data have been deposited in a MIAME compliant database, GEO (accession number; GSE47007). By Wilcoxon u-test (p < 0.05) and by showing a 2-fold change, genes expressed specifically in diffuse-type GC were selected [22 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!