The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

29 protocols using genios plus microplate reader

1

Real-time Collagen Synthesis Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As previously described, collagen type-I (COLS) synthesis was investigated employing COL1A1-LV-tGFP, a GFP-based lentiviral vector (LV) driven by the human COL1A1 gene promoter [22 (link), 24 (link)]. A red fluorescence protein-based LV (EF1α-LV-FP602) was used to normalize the cell transduction efficiency [22 (link)]. This method allows us to perform the real-time assessment of multiple samples at the same time in a 96-well plate using a small amount of subject sera [22 (link)]. HPMECs were transduced with lentiviral particles obtained from the pCOL1A1-LV-tGFP and EFα-LV-FP602 lentivectors. Transduction efficiency was checked and confirmed under a fluorescence microscope. Treatment-induced variation of fluorescence was kinetically measured over a time-course of 12 hours using a Tecan GENios Plus microplate reader (Tecan, Switzerland). Excitation wavelengths used for fluorescence quantification were 485 nm and 535 nm, while emission wavelengths were 535 nm and 590 nm for pCOL1A1-LV-tGFP and EFα-LV-FP602, respectively. Data were normalized for transduction efficiency by reporting the ratio of pCOL1A1-LV-tGFP to EFα-LV-FP602 and expressed as a means ± SD of the relative fluorescence unit (RFU) values.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Intracellular Reactive Oxygen Species

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intracellular ROS levels were determined by using the ROS molecular probe 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCF-DA) (Molecular Probe, Eugene, OR, USA), as previously described [23 (link),24 (link)]. Within the cell, esterases cleave the acetate groups on H2DCF-DA, thus trapping the reduced form of the probe (H2DCF). Intracellular ROS oxidize H2DCF, yielding the fluorescent product, DCF. Cells were incubated for 3 h with the concentrations of extract indicated in the figure legends. After treatment, cells were incubated for 30 min with Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) containing 5 µM H2DCF-DA, then washed twice with HBSS and assessed for the fluorescence by using a Tecan GENios plus microplate reader (Tecan, Männedorf, CH, USA) in a light-protected condition. Treatment-induced variation of fluorescence was measured for 2 h in cell culture medium without phenol red. Excitation and emission wavelengths used for fluorescence quantification were 485 nm and 535 nm, respectively. All fluorescence measurements were corrected for background fluorescence and protein concentration. Using untreated cells as a reference, the overall anti- and pro-oxidant outcome was evaluated by comparison of five different measurements and expressed as percent of controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Biofilm formation of S. suis inhibition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biofilm formation ability of S. suis was monitored as described previously [26 (link)]. S. suis HA9801 was grown in TSB medium 12 h at 37°C, and then the bacterial culture was diluted with fresh TSB medium to a concentration of 106 CFU/ml for the anti-biofilm assay. A PF stock solution was freshly prepared in distilled water at a concentration of 1.6 mg/ml. After filtering with a 0.22 water-based filter, the stock solution was diluted at different concentrations ranging from 6.25 to 25 μg/ml in sterile culture medium, and an equal volume was added to the above bacterial suspension and incubated at 37°C for 24 h without shaking. A control culture with S. suis and no PF was also performed. Following growth, planktonic bacteria were removed and the biofilm was stained with 1% crystal violet for 10 min and then washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). After adding 95% ethanol to release the dye, the absorbance at OD595 nm was recorded with a Tecan GENios Plus microplate reader (Tecan, Austria). Biofilm formation by the ΔluxS mutant of S. suis HA9801, previously constructed by our research group [10 (link)], was assessed as described above. The assay was performed in the presence of DPD (final concentration of 3.9 μM) and PF at 25 μg/ml. A control culture with ΔluxS mutant and no PF was also performed. All assays were performed in triplicate and repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Azithromycin Inhibits Biofilm Formation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue culture plate assay was used to test the inhibitory effect of azithromycin on biofilm formation (Chen et al., 2017 (link)). A culture suspension of S. xylosus 700404 at the mid-exponential phase of growth was diluted with TSB to an optical density of 0.1 at 595 nm (OD595). Next, 100 μL of this suspension and 100 μL of azithromycin were added to each well of a 96-well microplate, at final azithromycin concentrations of 1/2-MIC (0.25 μg/mL), 1/4-MIC (0.125 μg/mL), 1/8-MIC (0.0625 μg/mL), and 1/16-MIC (0.03125 μg/mL), respectively. In addition, control (with TSB alone) and negative control (with bacteria alone) were included after incubation at 37°C for 24 h without shaking. The supernatant was removed, the wells were rinsed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.2), 200 μL of 99% methanol was added to the wells to fix the biofilms, and then, the plates were emptied after 15 min and stained for 5 min with 200 μL of 2% crystal violet per well (Ding et al., 2017 (link)). The wells were rinsed with PBS (pH 7.2), and the dye was resolubilized with 200 μL of 33% (v/v) glacial acetic acid per well (Ding et al., 2017 (link)). All wells were then measured using a Tecan GENios Plus microplate reader (Tecan, Austria) at 595 nm (Ding et al., 2017 (link)). The experiments were performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Intracellular ROS Quantification Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intracellular ROS levels were determined by using the ROS molecular probe 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCF-DA) (Molecular Probe, Eugene, OR, USA) as previously described with minor modification [24 (link),25 (link)]. In this assay, ROS oxidize H2DCF, producing the fluorescent compound DCF, the fluorescence levels of which are proportional to the amount of intracellular ROS. Cells were treated as indicated in figure legends and then processed for the intracellular ROS assessment. For the ROS assay, cells were incubated for 30 min with Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) containing 5 µM H2DCF-DA, then washed twice with HBSS, and then fluorescence was measured by using a GENios plus microplate reader (Tecan, Mannedorf, Switzerland. Excitation and emission wavelengths used for fluorescence quantification were 485 and 535 nm, respectively. All fluorescence measurements were corrected for background fluorescence and protein concentration. Using untreated cells as a reference, the antioxidant and prooxidant outcomes were evaluated by comparing five measurements and expressed as a percentage of untreated control cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Measuring Cellular Superoxide Dismutase Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was determined using a superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity assay kit (BioVision, Abcam, Waltham, MA, USA) [60 (link)]. The kit utilizes a WST-1 molecule (Water-Soluble Tetrazolium 1) that generates a water-soluble formazan dye upon reduction by the superoxide anion, which is liberated following the addition of an enzyme solution present in the kit. The superoxide reduction rate is linearly correlated with the xanthine oxidase activity, and it is inhibited by SOD. SOD inhibition activity can be colorimetrically determined at 450 nm. Cells were treated with sera, and proteins were extracted and quantified as described in Section 2.6. The supernatant of each sample and different blanks containing equal protein amounts were used to measure the SOD activity. Samples and blanks were read using a plate reader at 450 nm (GENios Plus microplate reader, Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland). To calculate the SOD activity (as inhibition rate %), the following equation was used: SOD Activity inhibition rate %=(Ablank1  Ablank3)  (Asample  Ablank2)(Ablank1  Ablank3)×100
where ABlank1 is the absorbance of the solution without the sample, ABlank2 is the absorbance of the solution without the enzyme working solution, and ABlank3 is the absorbance of the solution without the enzyme working solution and the sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Cellular Glutathione Redox Status

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The activity of glutathione (GSH) was measured by employing a fluorometric assay kit (BioVision, Abcam, Waltham, MA, USA) that provides a tool for the detection of GSH, GSSG, and total glutathione separately [62 (link)]. The O-phthalaldehyde (OPA) molecule reacts with GSH (not GSSG), generating fluorescence, thus specifically quantifying GSH. The addition of a reducing agent converts GSSG to GSH, so (GSH + GSSG) can be determined. To measure GSSG specifically, a GSH quencher is added to remove GSH, preventing reaction with OPA (while GSSG is unaffected). A reducing agent is then added to destroy the excess quencher and convert GSSG to GSH. Thus, GSSG can be specifically quantified. Cells were treated with sera, and proteins were extracted and quantified as described in Section 2.6. The GSH before and after adding the reducing agent was quantified using the GSH standard curve generated simultaneously in the 96-well black plate. Samples and standards were read using a fluorescence plate reader equipped with Ex/Em = 340/420 nm (GENios Plus microplate reader (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland)). Fluorescence values were corrected for background fluorescence and normalized for protein content, and the ratio of GSSG to GSH was used to determine the redox status of GSH in the cell.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cell-Surface ELISA for SNAP Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK-293 SL cells were transfected using PEI as above and seeded into
poly-L-lysine coated 96-well plates (Greiner BioOne, Germany) and incubated
for 2 days at 37°C 5% CO2. Each well was washed with 200
μl PBS, the cells were then treated with 50 μl 3%
paraformaldehyde per well for 10 min. Each well was washed as follows: Three
washes with wash buffer total (PBS + 0.5% BSA); for the last wash step, the
cells were incubated with wash buffer for 10 min. Primary rabbit anti-SNAP
antibody (GenScript, USA) was added at 0.25 μg/ml in 50 μl and
incubated for 1 h at RT, followed by three wash steps as described above.
The cells were incubated with secondary anti-rabbit HRP antibody (GE
Healthcare) diluted 1:1000 for 1 h. Again, the cells were washed three times
with wash buffer and then three times with PBS. Per well, 100 μl
SigmaFast solution was added, the plates were incubated at RT in the dark.
Reactions were stopped by the addition of 25 μl 3M HCl. 100 μl
of the resulting solution was transferred to a new transparent 96-well
plate, and the optical density was read at 492 nm using a Tecan GENios Plus
microplate reader. Cell-surface ELISAs were carried out in three biological
replicates with internal quadruplicates. Each plate contained wild-type and
mock-transfected cells as controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cell Proliferation Assessment by BrdU Incorporation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell proliferation was assessed by using a chemiluminescent immunoassay method, which is based on the measurement of BrdU incorporation during DNA synthesis (Roche, CH). When cells are pulsed with BrdU, it is incorporated into newly synthesized DNA strands of actively proliferating cells. The incorporation of BrdU into cellular DNA can be detected using anti-BrdU antibodies, allowing assessment of the population of cells synthesizing DNA. Subconfluent cells were treated for 48 with 10% (v/v) of serum from different subjects, and BrdU was added 12 hrs before the end of the experiments. After that, the culture supernatant was removed, and the cells were fixed with a Fix-Denat solution for 30 min. The Fix-Denat was discarded and cells were incubated with an anti-BrdU antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (anti-BrdU-POD) for 90 min. After rinsing three times with washing buffer, the substrate solution was added and allowed to react for 3–10 min at room temperature. Within this time window, the horseradish peroxidase catalyzes the oxidation of diacyl hydrazide, where the reaction product decaying from its excited state yields light. Finally, light emission was read by using a GENios Plus microplate reader (Tecan). Results were expressed as a means ± SD of the relative light units/sec (RLU/s) values [25 (link), 26 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Apoptosis in Adherent Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell apoptosis was assessed by using the fluorimetric kit APOPercentage (Biocolor Ltd., Carrickfergus, UK) following the protocol provided by the manufacturer. This assay has been employed with several adherent cell lines including endothelial cells [37 (link),38 (link)] and uses a dye selectively imported by cells that are undergoing apoptosis. Necrotic cells cannot retain the dye and, therefore, are not stained. HREC cells were treated as previously described in the “cell culture and treatment” section and the apoptosis assay was performed at day 6 of treatment in 96-well black plates (BD Falcon). The APOPercentage dye 3,4,5,6,-tetrachloro-2′,4′,5′,7′-tetraiodofluorescein was added to each well (dilution 1:10) and cells were incubated for 30 more min at 37 °C in a cell incubator. After thoroughly washing, 100 µL of APOPercentage dye release reagent was added to each well, and the cell-bound dye recovered into solution was measured using a GENios plus microplate reader (Tecan) with excitation and emission of 530 and 580 nm, respectively. Results were calculated as the means ± SD of five measurements and expressed as a percentage of untreated control cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!