The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Stata 12.0 version

Manufactured by StataCorp
Sourced in United States

Stata 12.0 is a comprehensive statistical software package developed by StataCorp. It provides a wide range of data management, analysis, and visualization tools for researchers and data analysts. Stata 12.0 offers a user-friendly interface and supports a variety of data formats, enabling efficient data manipulation and statistical modeling.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

3 protocols using stata 12.0 version

1

Metabolic Syndrome Prevalence and Sleep

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We excluded 112 participants with missing information on sex, marital status, education, occupation and metabolic data, and those with extreme values of sleep duration (Fig. 1). Finally, total participants 8 272 participants were included in our analyses. Demographic and metabolic features were showed based on gender using percentages for categorical variables and means ± SD for continuous variables. Prevalence of MetS and its components were calculated for the overall population and different subgroups, such as age groups, gender, BMI groups, sedentary behaviors and sleep duration. Sleep duration was classified as <6, 6–9, and >9 hours. Sedentary time behavior was divided into <3, 3–6, and > 6 hours. The relationships between sleep duration and MetS were evaluated by Restricted Cubic Spline Regression, adjusting for age, sex, education, occupation, smoking category, alcohol intake, physical activities, and BMI. The number of dots was chosen to 3 according to criteria to balance best fit and overfitting. MetS rate standardization was done using Henan province population in 2010. All the statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc). Figures used Stata 12.0 version (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Heterogeneity Assessment in Meta-analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the meta-analysis, we used SIR with its 95% CI to combine these pieces of data. Heterogeneity assumption in studies was checked with the Q statistic [9 (link)]. Meanwhile, we assessed the effect of heterogeneity in these studies by the following method: I2 = 100% × (Q − df)/Q [10 (link)]. A significant Q statistic (P < 0.10) suggested heterogeneity across studies, and then the result of the random-effect model was selected. If not, the result of the fixed effect model was selected. Additionally, publication bias was investigated with the funnel plot and Egger's linear regression test [11 (link)]. All the analyses were performed using the software Stata 12.0 version (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Examining Non-Linear Weather-Hospital Admission Relationships

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
During the second phase, we plotted two-way fractional-polynomial prediction plots with confidence intervals (CI) in order to better describe the potential non-linear relationships between the weather and hospital admissions (the y axis in each figure denotes log-hazard ratios). Due to the German law prohibiting reporting of individual admissions and hospitals, correlational analysis was only made on a daily basis but not hourly. From the generated PETs in 2009–2011 (see Fig. 2), it was observed that there was no heat stress (PET >35 °C in Western Europe; Matzarakis and Mayer 1996 ). PETs were mainly between −10 and 20 °C throughout 3 years in 2009–2011. Statistical software STATA 12.0 version (STATA, College Station, TX, USA) was used to perform all the statistical analyses.

Averaged PET by month and by day over 3 years in 2009–2011

+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!