The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

23 protocols using zirconia sleeve

1

Optogenetic Modulation of Sleep-Wake Cycles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three weeks after viral infection and implantation, mice were connected to fiber optic patch cords (Doric Lenses) using zirconia sleeves (Doric Lenses). Mice were allowed to habituate to the patch cords for 7–10 d. All optogenetic stimulations (15 ms pulses at 1 and 25 Hz; see text) were generated by a waveform generator (Master-8; AMPI, Jerusalem, Israel) that triggered blue-light lasers (473 nm; LaserGlow). We adjusted the light power of the lasers such that the light power exiting the optic fiber was 20 mW In acute photostimulation experiments, we monitored EEG-EMG signals in real time in order to precisely time the delivery of optical stimuli (5 s at 1 or 25 Hz) at the onset of NREM or REM epochs (∼10 s from onset).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fiber Optic Photostimulation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fiber optic cables (1 m long, 200 mm diameter; Doric Lenses) were firmly attached to the implanted fiber optic cannulae with zirconia sleeves (Doric Lenses) and coupled to lasers via a fiber-optic rotary joint (Doric Lenses). During photostimulation experiments, light pulse trains (5 ms pulses of 20 Hz; 2 s on, 2 s off) were programmed using a waveform generator (PCGU100; Valleman Instruments or Arduino electronics platform) that provided input to a blue light laser (473 nm; Laserglow). We adjusted the light power of the laser such that the light power exiting the fiber optic cable was 10–12 mW using an online light transmission calculator for brain tissue http://web.stanford.edu/group/dlab/cgi-bin/graph/chart.php. We estimated the light power at the ARC at 4.99 mW/mm2. Note that this is likely a high estimation because some light was probably lost at the interface between the fiber optic cable and the implanted fiber optic cannula.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

In Vivo Optogenetic Stimulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The blue light was delivered from 473 nm diode-pumped solid-state blue laser (Laserglow) at 10 Hz, 5 ms pulse width, and ~5 mW (measured at the end of the patchcord) using a custom-made waveform generator (Arduino). For in vivo experiments, mice were habituated to be connected to the fiber optic patch cord (Doric Lenses) before the experiment. Zirconia sleeves (Doric Lenses) were used to connect the patch cord to the fiber-optic cannulas.
For electrophysiological recordings, the fiber optic patch cord was placed above the slice surface.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Optogenetic Stimulation of Neuronal Targets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were allowed to adapt to the fiber patch cord for at least three days prior to experiments and typically not handled on the day of the experiment. Fiber optic cables (200 m diameter; NA: 0.22, 1 m long; Doric Lenses; or, 0.5m long, ThorLabs) were connected to the implanted fiber optic cannulas with zirconia sleeves (Doric Lenses) and coupled to lasers via a fiber optic rotary joint (Doric Lenses). We adjusted the light power of the laser (473 nm; Laserglow or Opto Engine) such that the light power (measured with a fiber optic power meter; PM20A; ThorLabs) at the end of the fiber optic cable was ~10 mW. Using an online light transmission calculator for brain tissue (http://web.stanford.edu/group/dlab/cgi-bin/graph/chart.php), we estimated the light power at the DMH or RPa between 3 and 6 mW/mm2. This is an upper limit due to possible light loss between the fiber optic cable and the implanted optic fiber. Light pulses were controlled by a waveform generator (Arduino) programmed to deliver light pulses. In most experiments (unless otherwise indicated), stimulation was on for 1 s, followed by 3 s off, pulses were 10 ms delivered at 20 Hz. After the completion of experiments, fiber placement and ChR2 expression were assessed. Animals without ChR2 expression or incorrect placement of optic fibers were excluded from analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Optogenetic Manipulation and EEG-EMG Monitoring in Mouse

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were allowed to recover for at least 3 weeks after the surgery and then habituated to a flexible EEG-EMG connection cable and an optical patch cord using zirconia sleeves (Doric Lenses) for 7 days within individual recording chambers. Each cable was flexible so that mice could freely move about their cages. Mice were optically stimulated with blue-light lasers (473 nm, 10 ms pulses at 20 Hz for 10 s) using a waveform generator (Master-8; AMPI) during the light phase (zeitgeber time 5 to 8). We adjusted the light power of the lasers such that the light power exiting the optic fiber was 20 mW. In experiments with predator odor, we placed freshly prepared rat bedding in mice home cage for a period of 1 h during the light phase (zeitgeber time 6 to 7). EEG-EMG signals were continuously recorded during the test period.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Optogenetic Stimulation of PVH-LPBN Pathway

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fibre optic cables (1.5 m long, 200 mm diameter; Doric Lenses) were firmly attached to the implanted fibre optic cannulae with zirconia sleeves (Doric Lenses). During occlusion and PVHMC4R→LPBN photostimulation experiments, light pulse trains (10-ms pulses of 20 Hz; 1 second on, 3 seconds off; 5 seconds on, 2 seconds off, respectively) were programmed using a waveform generator (PCGU100; Valleman Instruments or Arduino electronics platform) that provided input to a blue light laser (473 nm; Laserglow). We adjusted the light power of the laser such that the light power exiting the fibre optic cable was at least 10 mW using an online light transmission calculator for brain tissue http://web.stanford.edu/group/dlab/cgi-bin/graph/chart.php. We estimated the light power at the PVH, BNST, LH and LPBN to be 6.01, 4.99, 4.99 and 11.25 mW/mm2, respectively. Note that this is probably a high estimation because some light was probably lost at the interface between the fibre optic cable and the implanted fibre optic cannula. After the completion of photostimulation experiments, mice were perfused and the approximate locations of fibre tips were identified based on the coordinates of Franklin and Paxinos.63
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

In Vivo Fiber Photometry Procedure for Freely Moving Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments were conducted in an open arena in freely moving mice. Beginning 1 week post GCaMP injection, mice were habituated to the arena with fiber optic cable connected, and were administered 0.3 mL intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of saline for habituation purposes.
In vivo fiber photometry was conducted as previously described (Chen et al., 2015 (link)). A fiber optic cable (“patch cord,” 1.5 m long, metal ferrule, 400 μm diameter; Doric Lenses) was firmly attached to the implanted fiber optic cannula with zirconia sleeves (Doric Lenses). Laser light (473 nm) was adjusted such that a light intensity of less than 0.05 mW entered the brain; emission light was passed through a dichroic mirror (Di02-R488-25x36, Semrock) and GFP emission filter (FF03-525/50-25, Semrock), before being collected by a sensitive photodetector (Newport part #2151). The signal was digitized at 1019 Hz using a TDT data acquisition software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Optogenetic Stimulation of LPBN and CeA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patch cords (1 m long, 200 mm core diameter; Doric Lenses) were connected from a rotary joint (Doric Lenses) to monofibre optic cannulae through zirconia sleeves (Doric Lenses). A custom-made lickometer (Arduino) was used to detect licks and drive photostimulation upon each lick (10 Hz, 10 ms pulse width, 1 s duration). Blue light was generated from a laser (473 nm; Laserglow) at an intensity of 8.2–11.3 mW as measured at the tip of the optic cannula. We estimated the light power at the LPBN to be around 9.2–12.67 mW/mm2 and at the CeA to be 14.4–21 mW/mm2 as calculated by an online light transmission calculator (http://web.stanford.edu/group/dlab/cgi-bin/graph/chart.php).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Optogenetic Stimulation of LPBN and CeA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patch cords (1 m long, 200 mm core diameter; Doric Lenses) were connected from a rotary joint (Doric Lenses) to monofibre optic cannulae through zirconia sleeves (Doric Lenses). A custom-made lickometer (Arduino) was used to detect licks and drive photostimulation upon each lick (10 Hz, 10 ms pulse width, 1 s duration). Blue light was generated from a laser (473 nm; Laserglow) at an intensity of 8.2–11.3 mW as measured at the tip of the optic cannula. We estimated the light power at the LPBN to be around 9.2–12.67 mW/mm2 and at the CeA to be 14.4–21 mW/mm2 as calculated by an online light transmission calculator (http://web.stanford.edu/group/dlab/cgi-bin/graph/chart.php).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Optogenetic Stimulation of PVH-LPBN Pathway

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fibre optic cables (1.5 m long, 200 mm diameter; Doric Lenses) were firmly attached to the implanted fibre optic cannulae with zirconia sleeves (Doric Lenses). During occlusion and PVHMC4R→LPBN photostimulation experiments, light pulse trains (10-ms pulses of 20 Hz; 1 second on, 3 seconds off; 5 seconds on, 2 seconds off, respectively) were programmed using a waveform generator (PCGU100; Valleman Instruments or Arduino electronics platform) that provided input to a blue light laser (473 nm; Laserglow). We adjusted the light power of the laser such that the light power exiting the fibre optic cable was at least 10 mW using an online light transmission calculator for brain tissue http://web.stanford.edu/group/dlab/cgi-bin/graph/chart.php. We estimated the light power at the PVH, BNST, LH and LPBN to be 6.01, 4.99, 4.99 and 11.25 mW/mm2, respectively. Note that this is probably a high estimation because some light was probably lost at the interface between the fibre optic cable and the implanted fibre optic cannula. After the completion of photostimulation experiments, mice were perfused and the approximate locations of fibre tips were identified based on the coordinates of Franklin and Paxinos.63
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!