The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

42 protocols using rm4 5

1

Tumor Infiltrating Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumors were harvested and chopped into several pieces. The tumor pieces were digested into single cell suspensions by incubating in digestion buffer [2 mg/mL collagenase D (Merck) and 40 μg/mL DNase I (Merck)] for 1 h at 37 °C. Cell suspensions were filtered using a 70-μm cell strainer (Corning) and a 40-μm nylon mesh to remove cell clumps. After washing with FACS buffer (1% FBS in PBS), cells were primed with antibodies targeting CD45 (30-F11, BD Pharmingen), CD4 (RM4-5, BD Pharmingen), CD8 (53-6.7, BD Pharmingen), CD3 (17A2, eBioscience), or ICOS (7E.17G9, eBioscience). Next, the cells were permeabilized using a permeabilization kit (eBioscience) and stained for IFN-γ (eBioscience). Data was acquired using a CytoFLEX flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter) and analyzed using the FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

MSCV-based Retroviral Vector Targeting CD4

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two MSCV-based γ retroviral vectors were used to target the Cd4 gene as described by Kotov et al. 29 . One vector encoded Cas9 and the fluorescent protein mNeongreen and the other either Cd4 or control LacZ guide RNAs (gRNAs) and the fluorescent protein mAmetrine 30 . Both vectors were produced by modifying the LMP-Amt vector from S. Crotty (La Jolla Institute) as described by Kotov et al. 29 . Platinum-E cells (Cell Biolabs) were grown in complete DMEM (Life Technologies) and transfected with the aforementioned plasmids. Virus-containing supernatants were harvested several days later. B3K508 T cells were cultured with complete IMDM (MilliporeSigma) containing IL-7 (Tonbo Biosciences) and then activated in plates coated with CD3 (2C11; Bio X Cell) and CD28 (37.51; Bio X Cell) antibodies. The cells were transduced with retroviral supernatant and polybrene (MilliporeSigma) 24 and 40 hours after activation and transferred to uncoated plates without CD3 or CD28 Abs for five days, the last three in complete IMDM-containing IL-7 (Tonbo Biosciences). The cells were then stained with P5R:I-Ab or P5R:I-Ab-4E tetramers and then BV786-labeled CD4 (RM4–5; BD Biosciences) antibody and a fixable viability dye (Ghost Dye Red 780; Tonbo Biosciences). The stained cells were analyzed by flow cytometry as described below.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Murine CD4+ T Cell Dynamic Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Murine splenic CD4+ T cells were first stained with CFSE, according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (Invitrogen) and then with rat anti-mouse CD4-APC (RM4-5, BD Biosciences) mAb. After staining, cells were incubated in ibidi’s μ-Dish (ibidi, Nanterre, France) in the thermo-regulated chamber of the Zeiss Axiovert 100M confocal microscope. A time-lapse acquisition was performed with a delay of 120 s between frames. Each frame was illuminated using 488-nm and 633-nm lasers, and fluorescence was collected using 505- to 580-nm and 644- to 719-nm filters. The magnification was 40×/1.3 oil, and images were saved as 8 bits. The image stack was splitted using ImageJ, v1.43, and images were analyzed using CellProfiler 2.0.10415. The cell segmentation was performed on the CFSE fluorescence, and the fluorescence of the CD4 staining was analyzed using R software. Intensity was normalized to the maximum fluorescence measured at t0 for each condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Treg Migration and Suppression Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Splenocytes (1 × 106 cells/well) from FoxP3-eGFP/B6 mice (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) were plated in 5 Nm pore size transwells (Cell Biolab, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). RPMI 1640 with 10% FBS and antibiotics (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) was added to the outer well in the presence or absence of 100-500ng/ml mouse Ccl22 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Cells were allowed to migrate for 2 hrs before harvesting cells from the bottom well (Klarquist et al, 2010 (link); Justus et al, 2014 ). Cells from top and bottom wells and a splenocyte sample not included in the migration assay were subjected to immunofluorescent staining to detect Treg, using 145-2C11, RM4-5, and PC61 antibodies to CD3, CD4, and CD25, respectively (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Splenocytes were sorted using a BD FACS Aria III sorter (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Sorted Treg from reporter mice were combined with effector cells from TCR transgenic mice recognizing gp10022-35 (Pmel1 mice) or human tyrosinase368-376 (h3TA2 mice) in IFN-gamma ELISPOT plates in the presence of cognate peptide. The resulting suppression by Treg cells was quantified by comparing to the spot numbers produced by the same number of effector cells without Treg cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Treg Quantification in B16-BL6 Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess the Treg population by flow cytometry, the B16-BL6 tumors were harvested at 5 days following the final Tregs injection. Dissociated tumors were prepared as previously described [30 (link)]. Cells were stained as previously described [34 (link)]. Briefly, the cells were stained with peridinin chlorophyll protein-CY5.5-conjugated anti-CD4 Ab (cat. no. 550954, clone RM4-5, BD Biosciences), phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-CD25 Ab (cat. no. 12-0251-81, clone PC61.5, eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), and allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-Foxp3 Ab (cat. no. 17-5773-82, clone FJK-16s, eBioscience). Samples were analysed using a BD Biosciences BD FACScanto II flow cytometry analyser and FACSDiva software (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Treg Migration and Suppression Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Splenocytes (1 × 106 cells/well) from FoxP3-eGFP/B6 mice (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) were plated in 5 Nm pore size transwells (Cell Biolab, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). RPMI 1640 with 10% FBS and antibiotics (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) was added to the outer well in the presence or absence of 100-500ng/ml mouse Ccl22 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Cells were allowed to migrate for 2 hrs before harvesting cells from the bottom well (Klarquist et al, 2010 (link); Justus et al, 2014 ). Cells from top and bottom wells and a splenocyte sample not included in the migration assay were subjected to immunofluorescent staining to detect Treg, using 145-2C11, RM4-5, and PC61 antibodies to CD3, CD4, and CD25, respectively (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Splenocytes were sorted using a BD FACS Aria III sorter (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Sorted Treg from reporter mice were combined with effector cells from TCR transgenic mice recognizing gp10022-35 (Pmel1 mice) or human tyrosinase368-376 (h3TA2 mice) in IFN-gamma ELISPOT plates in the presence of cognate peptide. The resulting suppression by Treg cells was quantified by comparing to the spot numbers produced by the same number of effector cells without Treg cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Retinal Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anesthetized mice were perfused with 20 mL of PBS. Eyes were enucleated and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 2× PBS for 15 min and then transferred to 2× PBS on ice for 10 min. After dissecting eyes, retinal whole mounts were prepared. Retinas were then transferred to ice-cold methanol and kept at −80 °C until use.
For immunohistochemistry, retinas were first blocked in a blocking buffer (0.3% Triton, 0.2% BSA, and 5% goat serum in PBS) for 1 h at room temperature and incubated with primary antibodies and Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated isolectin GS-B4 (1:100; Thermo Fisher Scientific) overnight at 4 °C. After washing, retinas were incubated with secondary antibodies for 4 h at 4 °C. Retinas were mounted after washing. Rabbit anti-P2ry12 antibody (1:500; a gift from H. Weiner, Brigham and Women’s Hospital), rat anti-CD11b antibody (1:100, clone M1/70; Abcam), rat anti-MHC class II (1:1,000, I-A/I-E; BD Pharmingen), rat anti-CD4 (1:200, RM4-5; BD Pharmingen), and rat anti-CD8a (1:200, 53-6.7; BD Pharmingen) were used for primary antibodies. Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody, and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rat antibody (1:500; Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used for secondary antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cytokine Profiling of Activated Splenocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cell splenocyte suspensions were incubated in RPMI 1640 culture medium and stimulated ex vivo for four hours with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA, 30ng/mL) and ionomycin (400ng/mL) with Brefeldin-A (10ug/mL) at 37°C. After stimulation, cells were stained for the follow extracellular and intracellular markers: anti-CD4 (RM4.5, BD Biosciences), anti-CD8 (MCD0830, Invitrogen), anti-TNF (MP6-XT22, BioLegend), anti-IFNγ (XMG1.2, BD Pharmingen), and anti-IL-2 (5336636, BD Pharmingen). Data were analyzed with FlowJo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells from the thymus, spleen or lymph nodes were resuspended in staining buffer at a density of 2 × 106 cells/ml. The cells were incubated with anti-FcγRII/III monoclonal antibody (mAb) (2.4G2), followed by antibodies against CD4 (RM4-5, BD Pharmingen), CD8 (53–6.7, BD Pharmingen), B220 (RA3-6B2, BioLegend), Thy1.1 (53–2.1, BioLegend), Thy1.2 (OX-7, BioLegend), CD44 (IM7, BioLegend), CD62L (MEL-14, BioLegend), Dll1 (HMD1-5, eBiosciences), Dll4 (HMD4-1, eBiosciences), Jagged1 (HMJ1-29, eBiosciences) or Jagged2 (HMJ2-1, eBiosciences). After gating out cells that were positive for 7-AAD, excluding the doublets, the fluorescence intensity of 105 cells was measured with a FACS Canto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, CA) and analyzed with FACSDiva (BD Biosciences) or FlowJo (Tree Star) software programs. For intracellular staining, cells were fixed with an intracellular staining kit (72–5775, eBioscience), permeabilized and stained with Foxp3 (3G3, Tonbo Biosciences) antibody.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunophenotyping and Cell Sorting Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Labeled antibodies specific for CD4 (RM4-5), CD44 (IM7), CD25 (PC61), CD62L (MEL14), CTLA-4/CD152 (UC10-4F10), FoxP3 (FJK-16s) and Hamster IgG1,κ (A19-3) were purchased from BD Biosciences or eBioscience. Isolated cells from lymph nodes and spleen were stained with commercially available antibodies, listed above. Intracellular staining for FoxP3 and CTLA-4 (CD152) was performed using a FoxP3 staining buffer set, according to the manufacturers’ instructions (eBioscience, San Diego, CA USA). Stained single-cell suspensions were analyzed using a BD LSRII flow cytometer running FACSDiva software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA USA). Cell sorting experiments were performed with a MoFlo cytometer high-speed cell sorter (Dako) or a FACSAria (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!