The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

L8 m ultracentrifuge

Manufactured by Beckman Coulter
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom

The L8-M ultracentrifuge is a high-performance laboratory instrument designed for the separation and purification of biological samples. It is capable of achieving centrifugal forces up to 100,000 x g, enabling the efficient separation of particles, cells, and macromolecules. The L8-M provides consistent and reliable results, making it a valuable tool for researchers and scientists in various fields, including biochemistry, molecular biology, and biotechnology.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using l8 m ultracentrifuge

1

Purification of BMP-7 Complex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
10 μg of BMP-7 complex dialyzed against TBS containing 0.25–4 m urea was applied to a 5–20% (w/v) sucrose gradient. Ultracentrifugation was carried out as described previously using a Beckman L8-M ultracentrifuge (13 (link)). Each gradient was collected in 28 fractions and analyzed by Western blotting using specific anti-BMP-7 PD (mAb2 from Millipore, Billerica, MA) and GF (500-P198, Peprotech) antibodies (13 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Isolation of Chromera Light-Harvesting Complex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

C. velia cells were broken and solubilized as described in Kaňa et al. (2016) (link) and then loaded on a fresh, continuous 5–15% sucrose density gradient prepared using a home-made gradient maker in buffer containing 25 mM HEPES pH 7.8 and 0.04% n-dodecyl β-D-maltoside (β-DM). The ultracentrifugation was performed at 140 000 g at 4 °C for 20 h (with rotor SW28, for 40 ml tubes, of an L8-M ultracentrifuge; Beckmann, USA). The resulting band no. 2 contained a strong double band at 18 and 19 kDa, previously identified as ‘fucoxanthin chlorophyll a/c binding protein (FCP)-like antenna’ (Tichy et al., 2013 (link)). The band analysis by Pan et al., (2012) (link) and Tichy et al. (2013) (link) placed this antenna protein within the main FCP-like group of light-harvesting complexes and so it was named Chromera light harvesting complex (CLH).
After separation by sucrose gradient, the antenna protein was desalted using a PD10 column (GE Healthcare) in a buffer containing 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.6) and 0.01% (w/v) β-DM. Spinach LHCIIb was isolated as previously described (Ruban et al., 1994b (link)) and then purified, desalted and eluted in the same buffer as CLH. In both cases, antennas were isolated from samples dark-adapted for 30–45 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Sucrose Gradient Fractionation of Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Discontinuous sucrose gradients were prepared in 14 × 89 mm Ultra Clear Ultracentrifuge tubes (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA) by layering 5–23% (top to bottom) sucrose in NIB + 1% Triton X-100 in 0.37 mL steps of 2% sucrose increments. 700 µL of yeast extract or recombinant protein diluted in NIB Buffer was then added to the top of the gradient. Sucrose gradients were centrifuged at 100 k x g (50 kRPM) in a Beckman L8-M ultracentrifuge for 2 hr at 4 ˚C in a chilled SW60ti swinging bucket rotor. 0.5 mL gradient fractions were collected from the top by hand, vortexed, and 100 µL of each fraction was mixed 2:1 in 3X SDS-PAGE sample buffer (65 mM Tris pH 6.8, 3% SDS, 10% glycerol, 10% 2-mercaptoethanol, 50 mM NaF, 50 mM β-glycerophosphate, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate) and boiled for 5 min. Samples were then subjected to SDS-PAGE and western blotting or Coomassie staining. To calculate S-values of sedimentation peaks from western blot signal intensities, mean band intensities were measured using Image Studio Lite (LICOR, Lincoln, NE), and Gaussian Curves were fit to these values. The peak of the Gaussian for each sedimentation peak of each protein was used to assign the known or interpolated S-value.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Polysome Profiling of Cycloheximide-Treated ES Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ES cells, grown to 80% confluence, were incubated with 1% (vol/vol) of 9 mg/mL cycloheximide (Sigma Aldrich) for 10 minutes at 37°C and then trypsinized. Cells were washed with PBS and lysed at 4°C using a handheld homogenizer (Fisher Scientific) in polysome buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (Fisher Scientific), 240 mM NaCl (Fisher Scientific), 10 mM MgCl2 (Sigma Aldrich), 5 mM beta-mercaptoethanol (Sigma Aldrich), 250 mM sucrose (Fisher Scientific), 2% Triton X (Sigma Aldrich), 100µg/mL heparin (Alfa Aesar), and 90µg/mL cycloheximide. Lysates were run on 15–55% sucrose gradients containing 25 mM Tris-HCl, 25 mM NaCl and 5 mM MgCl2. Gradients were centrifuged at 28,000 rpm for 7–8 hours using a Beckman L8-M ultracentrifuge. The gradients were then broken down using an ISCO density gradient fractionator, retriever and UA-6 UV/Vis detector (ISCO).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fractionation of Brain Regions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In separate experiments, non-infused mice were anesthetized with Nembutal (50 mg/kg, i.p.) and decapitated. Brains (n = 10 saline, n = 12 fluoxetine) were removed quickly and frozen in 2-methylbutane at −40°C on dry ice, then stored at −80°C. Half-brains were homogenized using a Tenbroeck tissue grinder on ice (Kontes Glass, Vineland, NJ, USA) in 2 vol of cold buffer containing 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 0.34 M sucrose and protease inhibitor cocktail tablet (Complete, Roche, Mannheim, Germany).
Homogenates were centrifuged at 14,000 g for 20 min, then at 100,000 g for 1 h at 4°C (Beckman L8-M Ultracentrifuge, Fullerton, CA USA). The supernatant corresponded to the cytosolic fraction. The pellet then was resuspended in 0.2 M Tris, pH 7.4 containing 0.2% Triton X-100 and protease inhibitors (Sigma-Aldrich), incubated on ice for 1 h with occasional stirring, and finally centrifuged at 100,000 g for 1 h at 4°C. The soluble supernatant was used as the membrane fraction. Protein concentrations of both fractions were determined by the Bradford method [37 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Overexpression and Detection of CusS Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cusS gene and its derivatives were cloned into pASK-IBA7 (IBA, Göttingen, Germany), which attaches an amino-terminal Strep Tag II under the control of the tet promoter in E. coli strain BL21(pLys). Precultures in LB were diluted 50-fold into fresh LB and were incubated with shaking at 37°C until the turbidity at 600 nm reached 1.0. Anhydrotetracycline (AHT) was added to a final concentration of 10 or 200 μg/L. Incubation was continued with shaking at 30°C, and the cells were harvested by centrifugation. Crude extract was prepared by ultrasonication followed by removal of the debris by centrifugation for 30 min at 4°C and 5,000 rpm (Eppendorf 5804R, Eppendorf, Hamburg). The crude extract was further separated into membrane and soluble fractions by ultracentrifugation (1 h at 45,000 rpm and 4°C; Beckman L8-M ultracentrifuge). Following SDS-PAGE (52 (link)) of samples representing 50 μg of dry mass or 25 μg of protein in a linear 10% (wt/vol) gel, the proteins were transferred by semidry electroblotting onto a nitrocellulose membrane (NCP, Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) at 3 mA/cm2 and 15 V for 30 min and detected using a Strep-Tactin peroxidase conjugate antibody (Institut für Bioanalytik Göttingen, Germany) and chemiluminescence detection, as described by the manufacturer (Lumi-Film, Roche, Mannheim, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Extracellular Vesicle Isolation by Ultracentrifugation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 48 h incubation, the conditioned media was collected and centrifuged at 300xg for 10 min to pellet cells. The supernatant was collected and spun at 2,000xg for 20 min to remove dead cells, followed by storage at -80 °C until EV isolation.
To isolate the EVs, the conditioned medium underwent differential ultracentrifugation using a 30% sucrose/deuterium oxide (Sigma-Aldrich, Poole, UK) cushion, made up to a density of 1.210 g/cm3 [22 ]. The conditioned media was passed through a 0.22 µm filter (Sarstedt, Leicester, UK), loaded onto a 30% sucrose cushion, and then centrifuged at 100,000xg for 1 h 45 min on an SW28Ti rotor, 25PC Polycarbonate open-top tubes (Scientific Laboratory Supplies, Nottingham, UK) and using an L8-M Ultracentrifuge; k-factor 296.8 (Beckman Coulter, High Wycombe, UK). Using a 21G needle and syringe, 3-4 ml of EV suspension was collected at the interface between the sucrose cushion and conditioned media. DPBS was added to this suspension, and it was centrifuged on a Type 70.1Ti fixed angle rotor at 100,000xg for 60 min to pellet pure EVs. All ultracentrifugation experiments were performed at 4 °C and EV pellets were stored at -80 °C. For clarity, this paper uses the term ‘extracellular vesicles’ to describe both exosomes and microvesicles which are smaller than 0.22 µm and float at a density of < 1.2 g/ml, and hence represent small EVs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Subcellular Fractionation and Cholesterol Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were isolated on ice by washing 2× with cold PBS and 1× with homogenization buffer (HB; 20 mM tris pH 7.4, 250 mM sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, protease inhibitor as needed). Cells were collected in HB + protease inhibitor and homogenized in Dounce homogenizer. A post-nuclear supernatant was carefully layered on top of a prepared 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% (top to bottom) OptiPrep gradient in a clear ultracentrifuge tube. Samples were spun at 40,000 rpm in a Beckman L8-M Ultracentrifuge for 3 h at 4 °C under vacuum in a SW41 swing rotor. Fractions were collected by aliquoting 800 μL from the top of the ultracentrifuge tube. Aliquots of each fraction were removed for protein determination with a modified Lowry assay. The samples were analyzed for protein by Western blot. For cholesterol analysis, the lipids were extracted with chloroform: methanol (2:1) and spotted on a TLC plate. Cholesterol was separated using the solvent system hexanes: ethyl ether: acetic acid (30:20:1). To visualize the lipids, plates were submerged briefly with 3% Copper acetate (w/v) in 8% phosphoric acid (v/v) and heated at 180 °C for approximately 15 min to char [103 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Bortezomib-Induced Proteasome and OAT3 Modulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (250–300 g) were administered vehicle (98% saline, 2% ethanol, 0.1% ascorbic acid) or bortezomib (0.2 mg/kg) by intravenous injection, and euthanized by CO2 inhalation at 12 hours post-dose, and the kidneys were immediately placed into freshly oxygenated ice-cold saline [25 (link)]. Tissue slices (<0.5 mm, 5–10 mg wet weight) were cut with a Stadie-Riggs microtome. The kidney cortex was homogenized in CelLytic MT cell lysis reagent containing 1% protease inhibitor cocktail and centrifuged at 5,000 g for 15 minutes using SW41 rotor and L8-M ultracentrifuge (Beckman). The supernatant was collected as the whole cell lysate fraction. The remaining supernatant was centrifuged at 100,000 g for 2 hours, then the collected pellet as the crude membrane fraction [13 (link), 26 (link)]. Whole cell lysate fraction was used to assay 20S proteasome activity and OAT3 ubiquitination in kidney, and crude membrane fraction was used to detect OAT3 by immunoblotting.
All animal experiments were conducted following guidelines described in the guide for the care and use of laboratory animals (Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care) as well as requirements established by the animal protocol (PROTO999900376) approved by the Rutgers Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Polyribosome Profiling by Sucrose Gradient

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extracts were prepared for polyribosome profiling as described previously (Mustroph et al., 2009; Zhu et al., 2016) . A total of 2,000 A260 units of the supernatant were layered onto a linear 15%-60% sucrose gradient poured with a peristaltic pump (LEAD FLUID, BT101S). Following ultracentrifugation in a Beckman L8-M Ultracentrifuge with an SW55 rotor at 237,000× g for 1.5 h at 4°C, the gradients were analyzed using a 185 Gradient Fractionator (ISCO Lincoln, NE) attached to an ISCO UA-5 UV detector for continuous measurement of the absorbance at 254 nm. All fractions were collected using a fraction collector, and several selected fractions were subjected to RT-PCR analysis. The primer sets used for RT-PCR analysis are listed in Supplemental Data Set S4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!