The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using ethanol

1

Cryptotanshinone Extraction and Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cryptotanshinone of 99.26% purity (Selleckchem, Poznań, Poland), ≥99.9% methanol for HPLC (Chempur, Piekary Śląskie, Poland), 96% ethanol (Stanlab Sp. J., Lublin, Poland), ≥99.5% isopropanol (Fluka: BioChemika, Buchs, Switzerland), sodium hydroxide (Stanlab Sp. J.), 2-amino-2-methyl-1,3-propanediol (AMPD, Sigma-Aldrich, Poznań, Poland), 2-amino-2-(hydroxymethyl)-1,3-propanediol (TRIS, Sigma-Aldrich), 2,2′,2″-nitrilotriethanol (TEOA, Sigma-Aldrich), tris(2-propanol)amine (TIPA, Sigma-Aldrich), 96% sulfuric acid (VI) (Stanlab Sp. J., Lublin, Poland), 35–38% hydrochloric acid (HCl, POCH BASIC, Gliwice, Poland), acetonitrile for HPLC (Sigma-Aldrich), formic acid for HPLC (Sigma-Aldrich), and deionized water were used in the experimental procedures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Wax Moth Larvae: ABA Cytotoxicity and Anti-Staphylococcal Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The larvae model was used to assess ABA cytotoxicity and anti-staphylococcal activity in vivo. Sixth instar larvae of the greater wax moth, G. mellonella, of average weight equal to 0.21 g, were selected for the experiment. The larvae were injected with 20 µL of ABA solution (reaching 500 mg/L/larvae body mass) to evaluate its cytotoxicity or with 10 µL of the S. aureus 6538 strain (109 CFU/mL), or with such density of S. aureus and 20 µL of aforementioned ABA concentration together. Moreover, a negative control with 10 µL of PBS (Biowest, Riverside, MO, USA) was used. The usability control was injection of 10 µL of 96% (v/v) ethanol (Stanlab, Lublin, Poland). The larvae were placed in 90 mm Petri dishes (Noex, Warsaw, Poland) and incubated at 30 °C/five days. Each day, the mortality of larvae was monitored. Death was defined when the larvae were nonmobile, melanized, and did not react to physical stimuli. Five groups of 10 larvae each were analyzed for each testing condition, tests were performed twice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Catalysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemicals used in this work were: Pluronic P123 (Poly(ethylene glycol)-block-Poly(ethylene glycol)-block-Poly(ethylene glycol)-block) copolymer (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA), tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA, 98%), hydrochloric acid (POCH S.A. Gliwice, Poland, 35–38% HCl), manganese(II) nitrate hydrate (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA, 99.99%), copper(II) nitrate (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA, 99.99%), sodium borohydride (Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA, >98%), (3-aminopropyl)trimethoxysilane (APTMS, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, 97%), 2-propanol (p.a., StanLab, Lublin, Poland), 2,5-hexanedione (Sigma Aldrich, ≥98%) pyridine (C5H5N, Sigma Aldrich, 99.8%, glucose (Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA, ≥99.5%), ethanol (StanLab, Lublin, Poland, 96%) and deionized water.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Vasoactive Agents and Oxidative Stress Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following drugs were used: acetylcholine chloride (ACh), sodium nitroprusside (SNP), noradrenaline hydrochloride (NA) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louise, MO, USA); potassium chloride (KCl) (Chempur, Piekary Slaskie, Poland); pinacidil and U-46619 (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). The stock solutions (10 mM) of drugs were prepared in distilled water, except for Noradrenaline (NA) which was dissolved in a NaCl (0.9%) + ascorbic acid (0.01% w/v) solution; pinacidil was dissolved in DMSO, and U-46619 in ethanol. These solutions were kept at −20 °C, and appropriate dilutions were made in KHS (in mM: NaCl 115; CaCl2 2.5; KCl 4.6; KH2PO4 1.2; MgSO4 1.2; NaHCO3 25; glucose 11.1) on the day of the experiment. At a concentration of 0.01%, the solvents did not alter the reactivity of isolated aortic rings.
Myo-inositol, trichloroacetic acid (TCA), thiobarbituric acid (TBA), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB), 1-(trimethylsilyl) imidazole, pyridine and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA); while ethanol was purchased from Stanlab (Lublin, Poland). Other reagents were of analytical grade and were provided by commercial suppliers, including POCh (Gliwice, Poland), and Chempur (Piekary Slaskie, Poland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Synthesis of Ru-doped Hierarchical FAU Zeolite

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The preparation of hierarchical material based on commercial FAU-type zeolite was based on dispersing the commercial FAU zeolite (Alfa Aesar) in the amount of 0.50 g in a mixture containing 100.00 g distilled water, 1.25 g ammonia (StanLab), 60.00 g ethanol (StanLab, 96%) and 0.35 g CTABr (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) (Fluka Analytical). The whole mixture was placed in a polyethylene bottle and ultrasonicated for a period of 30 min at 65 °C. After this time, 0.56 g of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) (Aldrich Chemistry) was added to the solution as a silicon source, followed by 0.0122 g of ruthenium source, which was chloropentaaminoruthenium(III) chloride (Sigma Aldrich, >98%). In a further step of the synthesis, the whole mixture was stirred on a magnetic stirrer for 24 h at 65 °C, after which the resulting precipitate was drained on a glass funnel using a filter strainer, washed with a mixture of distilled water-ethyl alcohol at a ratio of 1:1, and allowed to air-dry at room temperature. After drying, the material was calcined for 5 h at 550 °C (Figure S16 in Supplementary Materials).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Chemical Exposure Effects Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Melatonin, indole-3-propionic acid (IPA), 17β-estradiol, sodium chlorate (NaClO3), ammonium thiocyanate (NH4SCN), potassium selenocyanate (KSeCN), potassium nitrate (KNO3), sodium fluoride (NaF), potassium perchlorate (KClO4) and bisphenol A (BPA) were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Ethanol (96%) was purchased from Stanlab (Lublin, Poland). The LPO-586 kit for LPO was obtained from Enzo Life Science (Farmingdale, NY, USA). All the used chemicals were of analytical grade and came from commercial sources.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

SEM Scaffold Cell Preparation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For SEM examination, the scaffolds with imposed cells of the studied lines were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Serva Electrophoresis, Heidelberg, Germany) diluted in cacodylate buffer (0.2 M, pH 7.4, Serva Electrophoresis). After 1 h, the samples were washed three times in cacodylate buffer for 5 min at room temperature and postfixed for 1 h at 4 °C in 1% osmium tetroxide (Serva Electrophoresis) diluted in cacodylate buffer. The samples were next bathed three times with cacodylate buffer for 5 min. Dehydration of the samples was performed by increasing concentrations of ethanol (Stanlab, Lublin, Poland) for 15 min in each solution (50%, 70%, 80%, 96%) at 4 °C. Subsequently, the studied cell lines were incubated in absolute alcohol three times for 15 min at room temperature. Finally, the specimens were transferred to pure acetone, air-dried, and covered with 30 nm of gold in a high-vacuum sputter coater (Edwards, Burgess Hill, United Kingdom). Observations were taken with a JSM-6610A scanning electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) using 20 kV accelerating voltage and a secondary electron detector, revealing topography contrast.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Ultrasound-assisted Extraction of Plant Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The dry plant material was grounded in a laboratory mill (A11 IKA, Germany) to obtain a homogenous drug powder. Drug material (2 g) was extracted for 30 min with 20 mL of 50% (v/v) ethanol (Stanlab, Lublin, Poland) solution using an ultrasound-assisted method (U-504 Ultron, Moorpark, CA, USA). Subsequently, the extract was filtered through a paper filter. ethanol was removed under vacuum using a rotary evaporator (Heidolph G3, Heidolph, Schwabach, Germany) at 40 °C. The extracts were prepared in triplicates. Obtained ethanol-free water extract was frozen at −80 °C and lyophilised for 24 h using FreeZone 2.5 lyophilizer (Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA). Lyophilised extracts were diluted in sterile water, shortly before the experiment, to the final concentrations of 125, 250, 500 and 1000 µg/mL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Synthesis of Hierarchical Zeolite Catalysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The preparation of unmodified hierarchical zeolite MFI (ZSM-5), BEA (β) or FAU (Y) was based on dispersing weighed amount (0.75 g) of commercial zeolite of ZSM-5 (Acros Organics B.V.B.A., Geel, Belgium), β (Alfa Aesar, Ward Hill, MA, USA) or Y (Alfa Aesar, Ward Hill, MA, USA) type in a mixture containing 150.00 g of distilled water, 1.875 g of ammonia (StanLab, Lublin, Poland), 90.00 g of ethanol (StanLab, Lublin, Poland), and 0.525 g of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTABr) (Fluka Analytical, Buchs, Switzerland). This process was carried out in a polyethylene bottle, for a period of 30 min, at 65 °C, using an ultrasonic bath. After 30 min, 0.84 g of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) (Aldrich Chemistry, Saint Louis, MO, USA) was added to the solution as a source of silicon. The entire solution was then stirred on a magnetic stirrer for 4 h at 65 °C.
After this time, the precipitate obtained was filtered on a glass funnel using a filter paper, washed with a mixture of distilled water and ethyl alcohol in a volumetric ratio of 1:1, and left to dry in air at room temperature. After drying, the precipitate was calcined in order to remove the templating agent (CTABr). The calcination was carried out for 5 h at 550 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Hierarchical Faujasite-Based Material Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The preparation of a hierarchical material based on commercial FAU-type zeolite was based on dispersing commercial FAU zeolite (Alfa Aesar, Haverhill, MA, USA) in an amount of 0.50 g in a mixture containing 100.00 g distilled water, 1.25 g ammonia (StanLab, Lublin, Poland), 60.00 g of ethanol (StanLab, 96%), and 0.35 g of CTABr (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) (Fluka Analytical). The whole mixture was placed in a polyethylene bottle and ultrasonicated for a period of 30 min at 65 °C. After this time, 0.56 g of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, silicon source) (Aldrich Chemistry, Saint Louis, MI, USA) was added to the solution as a source of silicon. In a further step of the synthesis, the whole mixture was stirred on a magnetic stirrer for 4 h at 65 °C, after which the resulting precipitate was drained off on a glass funnel using a filter strainer, washed with a mixture of distilled water—ethyl alcohol—in a ratio of 1:1, and left to dry in the air at room temperature. After drying, the material was calcined for 5 h at 550 °C.
TEOS molecules are incorporated into the interblock space and undergo simultaneous hydrolysis to form stable SiO2 filaments between the individual sheets and the surfactants (CTABr), used for intercalation or swelling [45 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!