The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Jmp pro software version

Manufactured by SAS Institute
Sourced in United States

JMP Pro is a statistical analysis software developed by SAS Institute. It provides advanced analytical capabilities, including data visualization, modeling, and predictive analytics. The software is designed to help users explore, analyze, and interpret complex data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

9 protocols using jmp pro software version

1

Statistical Analysis of PCV2 Variant Impacts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For data analysis, JMP Pro software version 10.0.2 (SAS Institute) was used. Summary statistics were calculated for all the groups to assess the overall quality of the dataset, including normality. Statistical analysis of the data was performed by one-way ANOVA for continuous data (log10-transformed PCR data, ELISA data and mean daily weight gain). A P value <0.05 was set as the statistically significant level. A pairwise test using Tukey’s adjustment was subsequently performed to determine which differences among groups were statistically different. Serum qRT-PCR results (copies ml−1) were log10 transformed prior to statistical analysis. Non-repeated nominal data (histopathology scores) were assessed using a non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA; if there was a significant difference, pairwise Wilcoxon tests were used to evaluate differences among groups. Differences in prevalence were determined by using χ2 tests. In line with the objectives, PCV2a (n = 7), PCV2b (n = 8) and mPCV2 (n = 8) groups were compared initially. In a subsequent step, all groups were compared. For completeness, the importance of the 234 mutation in ORF2 was also evaluated by using the following groups: ORF2 233 (PCV2a, PCV2b and reciprocal chimeric PCV2 groups, n = 20) versus ORF2 234 (mPCV2 and PCV2b-234-K groups, n = 14).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Risk Factors for Choroidal Neovascularization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro software, version 12.0 (SAS, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The appropriate descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, median, range, and percentages) were applied. The analysis of variance, Fisher’s exact test, Chi-square test were used to analyze the correlations between the variables (baseline FAF patterns, age, sex, BCVA, AMD type of the fellow eye, drusen, retinal pigmentation, retinal atrophy, baseline retinal sensitivity, family history, smoking habit, supplement intake, hypertension, body mass index, hematological parameters). Multivariable logistic-regression models were prepared to estimate the risk of CNV development associated with potential predictors including age, LDL cholesterol and supplementation. Inclusion of variables in the models was based on factors that were significant in univariate analysis. We estimated a logistic model which contained all covariates as possible confounders and all interaction terms between perceived patient demand and the covariates as possible effect modifiers. The statistical significance was set at p<0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluating Patient Satisfaction in Telemedicine vs. In-Person Vascular Care

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Mayo Clinic Neurological, vascular and neurovascular Events With SARS-CoV-2 (MC NEWS) Study (institutional review board No. 20-003457) is a retrospective study of all patients affected by the COVID-19 pandemic identified within the three major campuses of Mayo Clinic, which includes hospitals in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota. Informed consent was not required for the study, because it was deemed at minimal risk to patients. Using the shared electronic medical record (Epic; Verona, Wisc) and data obtained from the Enterprise Office of Access, we identified patients within the practice of vascular surgery from January 1, 2020, to August 6, 2020. Our control group included all encounters with patients, who were seen on face-to-face interactions before the declaration of the pandemic on March 11, 2020. Our study group included all encounters with patients, who participated in telemedicine interactions with our vascular surgery practice. The end point is a direct patient satisfaction comparison between face-to-face and telemedicine encounters/interactions before and during the pandemic, which was provided by the Office of Patient Experience Research. All of the data provided are descriptive in nature and comparisons were made using JMP Pro software version 14.1.0 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were performed with JMP® Pro software version 15.0.0 (SAS institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine the distribution of continuous data. Normally distributed variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Non-normally distributed variables were expressed as median (interquartile range [IQR]). To determine the association between two variables, Pearson correlation was used for normal distribution data, while Spearman rank correlation was used for non-normally distributed data. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the difference in non-normally distributed continuous variables between the two groups. The difference with p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Corneal Nerve Regeneration after DMEK

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using JMP Pro software version 15.0.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). We used the Mann–Whitney U test followed by the Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test to compare BCVA, CCT, corneal sensitivity, and ECD at all measurement points (preoperatively, and 6, 12, and 24 months after DMEK). Evaluations performed with IVCM for total nerve length, number of trunks, and number of DCs were analyzed in the control group as well as in the four aforementioned groups. The correlation between the total nerve length and each endpoint (CCT, ECD, Trunk, Branch, DCs) was analyzed. The sample size was validated with calculated power of > 99%. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. All quantitative variables are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Ophthalmic Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using JMP Pro software version 17.1.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Qualitative data were compared using the Fisher’s exact test. The Wilcoxon t-test was used for nonparametric numerical data. The Bonferroni correction is used when several dependent or independent statistical tests are being performed simultaneously. Univariate linear regression analyses were performed to determine the associations of the percentage change in the polyp area and treatment outcome. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the BCVA and CRT before and after treatment. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multivariate Analysis of Early Cell Death

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using the JMP Pro software version 14.0.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). To compare the continuous variables in each group, we used the t-test; to compare the nominal variables, we applied Pearson’s chi-squared test. Pearson correlation analysis was used for the univariable analyses. Associations between the factors and ECD loss rates at 12 months were examined using multivariable regression analysis and second-order polynomial regression after stepwise variable selection (using the minimum Bayesian information criterion and increasing the number of variables). To exclude potential multicollinearity factors between the variables, we checked the variance inflation factor. The statistical significance level was set at P-values of < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Aqueous Humor Protein Analysis in Ophthalmology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using JMP Pro software version 11.2.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). A two-sided paired t-test was performed to compare the changes of BCVA and CRT at baseline and at 12 months. Associations between baseline factors, cytokine concentrations, and visual and anatomical outcomes were examined with Pearson’s correlation coefficient after a normal distribution was confirmed with Shapiro-Wilk’s W-test or Spearman’s rho for categorical variables. Stepwise variable selection (using minimum Bayesian information criterion, increasing the number of variables) was performed using baseline BCVA, BCVA change at 12 months, number of ranibizumab injections, and CRT and CCT (at baseline and change at 2 months) as response variables, and disease type, disease duration (months), sex, age, axial length (mm), PVD, GLD (μm), CRT (μm), CCT (μm), BCVA, and each log concentration of aqueous humour proteins as predictor variables. The concentrations of aqueous humour proteins were log-transformed because of the lognormal distribution of these variables. To select the predictor variables in multiple regression analysis, we used the non-fixed stepwise method due to its objectivity and to avoid the risk of multicollinearity [22 ]. We then used multiple regression analysis after stepwise variable selection. P < 0.05 was considered to be significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Survival Analysis of Prognostic Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Survival curves are estimated for each group in a study considered separately using the Kaplan-Meier method. The association between the aforementioned prognostic indicators and OS rates was investigated using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. The preoperative indicators observed to be statistically significant (P < 0.05) in univariate analysis were subjected to multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the JMP Pro software, version 13.2.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!