The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

38 protocols using easyscan 2

1

Biodegradation of LDPE by Microalga

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To study the surface erosion and biodegradation of LDPE sheet by biological treatment of the selected microalga, atomic force microscopy was employed. Atomic scope microscope Nanosurf Easyscan 2, head type EZ2-AFM with scan head 10-06-176.hed was used. Cantilever type: ContAI-G was used with static force as operating mode and Air was the measurement environment. The Z-controller was set at setpoint: 20 nV, with I-gain: 1000 and P-gain: 10,000. The AFM was controlled using the software version 3.0.1.16 and firmware version 3.1.3.0. The images were taken at 25 µm2, 10 µm2 and 5 µm2 sizes and analyzed with different mode by software Nanosurf Easyscan 2 version 3.8.6.3. A fresh untreated LDPE sheet was used as control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterizing Surface Roughness with AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ra was evaluated using a rugosimeter (SV-3100S4 -Mitutoyo, Tokyo, Japan) coupled with an atomic force microscope (Easy Scan 2, Nano surf, Boston, USA). The precision was 0.01 μm, with a cut-off value of 0.25 mm, reading length of 5 times the cut-off value (1.25 mm), and mean velocity of 0.1 mm/s. The specimens were placed parallel to the equipment surface and marked with 3 equidistant points at the center to guide the reading. The readings were performed at 180°, 135°, and 90°. The atomic force microscope (Easy Scan 2, Nano surf, Boston, USA) was operated in the tapping mode, with a constant of 31-71 N/m, wavelength of 225 μm, and resonance frequency of 160-210 KHz. 3D topographic and lock-in phase images (15 × 15 μm) were obtained using a profilometer mounted on the microscope. Specimens from all groups were analyzed. For quantitative analysis of the surface, the mean of the 3 readings was the final Ra. For the qualitative analysis, 1 topographic image and representative lock-in phase images were randomly chosen for samples of each group. The images were processed using the Gwyddion software (Gwyddion 2.29, GNU General Public License).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Silicone Surface Roughness Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surfaces were observed using a Nanosurf Easyscan 2 AFM (Nanosurf Inc., USA). The AFM settings were: tapping mode, tip: NCLR, I-gain 10000, P-gain 5000. Thirty random 10 µm2 sections of each silicone surface were scanned and the mean surface roughness of each silicone surface was calculated using the Nanosurf Easyscan 2 software package (Nanosurf Inc., USA). The mean surface roughness of the test and control silicone surfaces were analysed for statistical significance using independent samples t-test on the IBM SPSS Statistics 20 software package (IBM Corp., USA). For all analyses, P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Atomic Force Microscopy of Peptide-Bacterial Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM imaging was performed under ambient conditions in air with a Nanosurf easyscan 2 (Nanosurf AG, Switzerland). All measurements were carried out in tapping mode employing PPP-NCHR-W cantilevers from Nanosensors (resonance frequency ∼ 280 kHz, tip radius ∼ 10 nm). The mica substrates (20 × 20 mm2) were attached to a steel baseplate with Scotch tape and freshly cleaved prior to each new experiment. Peptides at a concentration of 4 × MIC were incubated with bacterial cell (B. subtilis OD600 = 0.1) in NaCl 0.9% for 10 min. The mixed solution was deposited onto a freshly cleaved mica surface. The solution was removed by gently rinsing with Milli-Q water after 5 min of incubation time. After dried with Argon gas, the substrate was analyzed with atom force microscopy. Peptide without bacterial treatment and bacterial without peptides were also analyzed by AFM as control. For details see ESI Fig. S2 and S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Rb-SA/PAAm Hydrogel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pore structure, element distribution, surface morphology of Rb-SA/PAAm gel were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Nova NanoSEM, USA), as well as energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS, EDAX, USA). Before SEM observation, the hydrogels were freeze-dried and coated with a thin platinum film to improve the image quality. The phase and crystallinity were detected by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Brooke Advance D8, Swiss). The surface roughness was measured via atomic force microscopy (AFM, Nanosurf Easyscan 2, Swiss) in an area of 10 × 10 μm2 under the tapping model. The freeze-dried hydrogel samples mixed with KBr were then pressed onto a transparent sheet and functional groups were examined by a Thermo Scientific Nicolet nexus Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Surface Characterization of Titanium Disks

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surfaces of the control, UV, blastedHF, and blastedHF+UV specimens were first observed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM, SU1510, Hitachi High-Technologies, Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV after sputter coating with Au using an ion coater (QUICK COATER SC-701, Sanyu Electron, Tokyo, Japan). Both surfaces of the disks and tapered cylinders were evaluated.
Examination with an atomic force microscope (AFM; Nanosurf Easyscan 2, Nanosurf, AG, Liestal, Switzerland) revealed the three-dimensional surface morphology and surface roughness (Sa) of the surface-modified disk specimens. AFM images were captured in air. The scans were obtained in the dynamic force mode with a tapping cantilever (Tap 190 Al-G, Budget Sensors; Innovative Solutions Bulgaria Ltd., Sofia, Bulgaria). AFM images were obtained for an area of 25 × 25 µm2. Surface roughness was measured as the three-dimensional arithmetic height (Sa) value obtained from the captured images on AFM analysis. Three specimens for each condition were measured.
Contact angles for each specimen with respect to double-distilled water were measured using a contact angle meter (DMe-201; Kyowa Interface Science Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The volume of the water drops was maintained at 1.0 µL, and 10 s measurements of each surface were made thrice under controlled conditions of 25 ± 1 °C and 46% humidity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles on Coated Catheters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cross-sections of the coated urinary catheter were subjected to line scans using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) (Quantax 70, Hitachi, Japan) to determine the presence of silver elements on the top surface and inside the tube materials. Size distribution of AgNPs on the coated surface was determined based on a scanning electron microscope micrograph taken at magnification values of 150,000× by field emission-scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) (Quanta 400, FEI, Eindhoven, The Netherlands), and the size distribution of the particles was determined by ImageJ. Surface roughness and topology were examined at the representative areas of the coated surface (5 × 5 mm) by using a noncontact mode of atomic force microscopy (AFM) (easyScan 2, Nanosurf, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of Film Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface morphology of films was characterized using a scanning electron microscope (Zeiss EVO 18) (Oxford instruments) by coating samples (3 mm × 3 mm) with a thin layer of gold and applying a 10 KV electron voltage. The morphology of membranes was observed by using Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FE-SEM), Carl-Zeiss Model Ultra-microscope-55 (German). The morphological structures of AP and APH films were analyzed using SEM. The texture of the film (1 cm × 1 cm) was captured by using an optical microscope (upright optical microscope Olympus BX61) using optical stream motion software; the image was analyzed at 200 µm and 20 µm at a magnification of 15 and 500. AFM (Nanosurf easy scan2 Nanosurf AG Switzerland 23-06-154) was used to characterize the morphology of the samples more precisely. Utilizing the interactions between the tip and the sample surface, AFM is a technique capable of recreating a topographic map of the sample surface. By collecting data on the cantilever’s deflection using a laser, it is possible to obtain morphology-specific data on the sample’s surface.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Characterization of Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Particle size and distribution (poly-dispersity index, PDI) were determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) using a Microtrac NANO-flex. Zeta potential of particle dispersion were measured by Stabino PMX 400. FTIR absorbance peaks were acquired using Bruker Tensor 27 FTIR spectrometer and NP dispersion and solution were dropped on KBr pellets and dried at 50 ºC. UV/Vis absorption spectra for F127 qualification was carried out with a UV–Vis–NIR spectrometer (Lambda 950, from Perkin Elmer). The photoluminescence spectra were measured using a JASCO spectrofluorometer FP-8500. SEM images were taken using a FEI Sirion SEM at 3 kV accelerating voltage. All samples were coated with 3 nm Pt before performing SEM measurements. AFM measurements were performed with a Nanosurf Easy Scan 2 in contact mode. Near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) spectroscopy have been recorded at the PolLux beamline at the Swiss Light Source66 (link). The samples were raster-scanned through the focal spot of a nickel zone plate with an outermost zone width of 25 nm (yielding approx. 30 nm lateral resolution) with a pixel resolution of 10 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Biofilm Surface Topology Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wells that contained biofilms were washed and dried as described elsewhere. After drying, the wells were cut out with a sharp blade and images of the wells taken with a FEI Nova nanoSEM 230 (FEI). The topology of the surfaces was studied using a Nanosurf Easyscan 2 atomic force microscope (AFM; Nanosurf AG, Switzerland). The AFM was operated in static force mode, equipped with a CantAI-G cantilever. The P-gain was adjusted to 2800, rotation to 45° and tip voltage to zero. Images were recorded in the range of 10 μm (x and y) and AFM parameters were evaluated using the SPIP 3D image processing 6.3.6 software (Image Metrology A/S, Hørsholm, Denmark).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!