The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using quantax eds

1

Characterization of Ni-Enriched Biochar

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Selected biochar
samples were analyzed after the sorption experiment to determine elemental
content, changes in surface structures, elemental distribution, and
crystalline phases present. Metal concentrations in the biochar after
24 h of contact with the 10 mM Ni sorption isotherm solution were
determined by microwave digestion and ICP-OES as previously described
for biochar. Changes in surface structures and elemental distribution
were determined using combined SEM and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
(EDS, QUANTAX EDS, Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA) methods. Crystalline
phase presence was determined through X-ray diffraction (XRD) performed
on duplicate-pooled biochar after 24 h of contact with the 5 mM Ni
sorption isotherm solution at Iowa State’s Materials Analysis
and Research Laboratory (Siemens D500 Powder Diffractometer, Bruker
Corporation, Billerica, MA) and analyzed using the Jade 9.5 software
(Materials Data Incorporated, Livermore, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Optical and Morphological Characterization of Ni/SiO2/Si Photoanodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The optical reflectance of the Ni/SiO2/Si substrate was measured using a single grating monochromator optronics laboratory platform (OL 750). The surface and cross-sectional morphologies of spiked SiO2 and electrodeposited Ni samples were characterized using field emission scanning electron microscopy (Zeiss, USA). The elements on the surface were analyzed using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (Bruker Quantax EDS for SEM). For analyzing the surface morphology, the surface was scanned in tapping mode using an atomic force microscope (AIST-NT Omegascope). To evaluate the Ni electrodeposited surface, the diameters and surface coverages of voids and electrodeposited Ni nano-islands were calculated using the “Image J” platform. The numerical simulations for the photoanodes were performed using the semiconductor module of a commercial numerical finite-element solver (COMSOL Multiphysics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

SEM Imaging of Scaffold Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A layer of gold film was coated on the surfaces of the scaffold specimens (control and test groups sample size, n = 3). The observed surface area of different scaffolds was chosen for photographs, which operate at 15 KV with 25×, 50×, 250×, 1000×, and 5000× magnification. Images were taken from at least five random, nonoverlapping flat areas. Microphotography was taken with a scanning electron microscope (SEM S-2400; Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and the composition of element analysis was determined by energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS, Bruker Quantax EDS, Berlin, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Tribological Surface Analysis of Lubricated Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the tribotests, all plates were sonicated in chloroform and then in ethanol baths, to remove the test lubricant from the surface. The surfaces were then analysed using an Olympus PMG3 Inverted microscope. Wear was determined on the upper surfaces (balls) in terms of the wear scar diameter observed on the images (wear scars were approximated as circles). The PD surfaces were additionally analysed using a Jeol 7800F SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope) equipped with Bruker Quantax EDS (Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy) unit. SEM and EDS were performed at a beam voltage of 15 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Synthesized Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of synthesized particles was examined using scanning electron microscope (SEM, Tescan Vega 3). We analysed SEM images to determine the size of the obtained particles. Briefly, we chose the ROI of approximately 40 × 40 μm for each SEM image. Next, the typical crystals (about 20 pieces for each sample) with well-defined boundaries were identified within ROI and imageJ software was used to automatically determine the average width and length of the crystals and to calculate the standard deviations. The elemental analysis was performed using energy dispersive x-ray spectrometer (QUANTAX EDS, Bruker) equipped with an XFlash 610 M detector with the resolution of <129 eV for the Mn Kα line. The crystal structure was determined with the x-ray diffractometer (XRD, PANalytical X’Pert Pro) using standard θ–2θ geometry. The detection was performed using the Cu Kα (λ = 1.54 Å) radiation at operating current and voltage of 30 mA and 40 kV, respectively. The angular resolution of the instrument was calibrated using LaB6 line profile standard (SRM660a–NIST certificate). The chemical composition of synthesized particles was determined with the Raman spectrometer (Almega XR of Thermo Electron Corp.). The chosen excitation light wavelength was 532 nm. Data was recorded in the spectral range from approx. 100 cm−1 up to 4000 cm−1 and with the spectral resolution of 2 cm−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Characterization of Nanostructured Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Powder X-Ray Diffraction (PXRD) patterns were collected in reflection geometry in the 10–80° 2θ range, with a 40 s step-1 counting time and with a step size of 0.016° on a PANalytical X’PERT PRO diffractometer (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Malvern, UK), PW3050 goniometer (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Malvern, UK), equipped with an X’Celerator detector (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Malvern, UK) by using the Cu Kα radiation. The long fine focus (LFF) ceramic tube operated at 40 kV and 40 mA. The UV-vis spectra of samples were measured in the range 250–700 nm.
The morphology and composition were examined by field emission gun electron scanning microscopy (FE-SEM) LEO 1525 ZEISS (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Elemental composition and chemical mapping were determined using a Bruker Quantax EDS (Bruker Nano GmbH, Berlin, Germany). The samples were deposited on conductive carbon adhesive tape and metalized with chromium (8 nm).
TEM images were obtained using a Philips 208 transmission electron microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The samples were prepared by putting one drop of an ethanol dispersion of the sample powder on a copper grid pre-coated with a Formvar film and dried in air.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Elemental Analysis of Mouse Hemimandibles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hemimandibles from three 7-week old mice were embedded in epoxy, and polished in a cross orientation using a series of SiC paper and diamond polishing suspension starting from incisor tip and stopping when mesial angle of the first molar was exposed. For each hemimandible, six randomly areas (as illustrated in Supplementary Figure S1) were subjected to an energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (Quantax EDS, Bruker Nano Inc.) to collect elemental composition of Ca, P, Na et al at 15 keV using a variable pressure chamber. Back scattered electron (BSE) images were also collected using a field emission scanning electron microscope (Sigma VP500 field emission SEM, Carl Zeiss Microscopy). The elemental composition collected from three Nckx4+/+ or Nckx4−/− mice was compared and the significance difference between two mouse models was determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Surface Characterization of Crystal 1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface compositions of the crystal 1 were analysed using a JEOL JPS-9200 X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS). Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) under scanning electron microscope (SEM), which was obtained by Hitachi SU8230 (Hitach High-tech), was performed and analysed by a Bruker Quantax EDS and ESPRIT software. Thermogravimetric differential thermal analyses (TG-DTA) were performed on Rigaku Thermo Plus TG-DTA 8120 thermal analysis station employing an Al2O3 reference sample, at the temperature range from room temperature to 800 °C at a heating rate of 5 K min−1 under a flow of N2 gas (flow rate 50 mL min−1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Acid-Coated QDs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Acid-coated water-soluble QdSe/ZnS QDs (product code QD620-WS-YY) were obtained from NanoOptical Materials Inc. (Carson, CA, USA). We then carried out fluorometer emission, DLS, and EDS studies to characterize the QDs.
For the fluorometer emission, the stock concentration (5 mg/mL) of QDs was diluted to 5% (v/v) with 18 MΩ deionized water. A total of 15 mL of 5% dilution of the sample was then pipetted into a quartz cuvette and the emission spectra were measured with a Shimadzu RF-6000 spectrofluorometer with an excitation wavelength of 375 nm.
For the DLS, the stock concentration (5 mg/mL) of QDs was diluted to 5% (v/v) with 18 MΩ deionized water. A total of 15 mL of 5% dilution of the sample was then pipetted into a disposable polystyrene cuvette and the hydrodynamic particle size was measured with a Zetasizer Ultra (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Malvern, UK).
For the EDS, the leftover samples from the fluorometer and DLS studies were used to form a thick film on a Si substrate. A total of 15 mL of 5% dilution of the sample was drop cast onto a Si wafer set on a hotplate at 75 °C until all the aqueous solution evaporated off and only a thick assembled layer of solid CdSe/ZnS QDs remained. The sample was then placed in a Quantax EDS (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) and the EDS was conducted at 10 kV incident beam energy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Biogenic Selenium Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The synthesis of SeNPs was confirmed by observing absorption peak maxima between 200 and 500 nm in a spectrometer (Genesis 10S UV–Vis, Thermo Scientific, Carlsbad, USA). The contribution of possible functional groups of A. glaucum leaf extracts to the synthesis of SeNPs was evaluated by FTIR analysis (Nicolet iS 5, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, USA) in the 4000-400 cm−1 region. Morphological characterization of SeNPs was performed by SEM (MIRA 3 LMU, TESCAN, Brno, Czech Republic) at 20 kV and TEM (JSM-1010, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at 80 kV. To determine the size distribution of SeNPs dispersed in the aqueous medium, the DLS technique was performed using a Zetasizer (Nano-ZS90, Malvern Instrument, United Kingdom). The elemental composition of the SeNPs was determined by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) using a microprobe for surface microanalysis (Quantax EDS, Bruker, Billerica, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!