The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

2 protocols using nbp2 37412

1

Protein extraction and Western blotting protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were extracted from cells or liver tissues in the lysis buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) consisting of protease inhibitor cocktail (1:100, TargetMol, MA, USA). The concentration of proteins was determined using BCA Protein Assay kit (Beyotime). The extracted proteins were separated by 10% SDS/PAGE and electro‐transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). After blocking in 5% milk for 1 h, the membranes were probed with primary antibodies against SLC27A5 (1:1000, NBP2‐37412, Novus Biologicals, CO, USA), α‐SMA (1:1000, ER1003, Huabio, Hangzhou, China), COL1A1 (1:1000, WL0088, Wanleibio, Shenyang, China), COL3A1 (1:1000, 22734‐1‐AP, Proteintech, IL, USA), RUNX2 (1:1000, 20700‐1‐AP, Proteintech, IL, USA), EGR3 (1:500, sc‐390967, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA), β‐actin (1:3000, BL005B, Biosharp), or GAPDH (1:3000, AG019‐1, Beyotime, Shanghai, China) at 4 °C overnight. Membranes were then incubated with horseradish peroxidase‐conjugated secondary antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). The staining was visualized using ClarityTM Western ECL Substrate (Bio‐Rad, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Histopathological Analysis of Liver Fibrosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liver specimens were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin and cut into 4 µm sections. Then, the specimens were deparaffinized, hydrated and stained by standard methods. To examine hepatic morphology and assess liver fibrosis, H&E and Sirius Red staining were performed. Sections were immune‐stained for SLC27A5 (1:500, NBP2‐37412, Novus Biologicals, CO, USA), α‐SMA (1:300, 19245T, CST, MA, USA), F4/80 (1:300, 70076T, CST), or RUNX2 (1:300, 20700‐1‐AP, Proteintech, IL, USA) overnight at 4 °C. Sections were then incubated with a secondary anti‐rabbit or anti‐mouse IgG (ZSGB‐BIO, Beijing, China) and stained using 3,3′‐diaminobenzidine (ZSGB‐BIO). Stained slides were scanned with a Pannoramic Scan 250 Flash and images were acquired using Pannoramic Viewer 1.15.2 (3DHistech, Budapest, Hungary). Immunostaining and Sirius Red staining were quantified by threshold analysis using the NIH ImageJ software. The immunohistochemical staining of SLC27A5 and RUNX2 was semi‐quantitatively analyzed using the immunoreactive scoring system.[62 (link)
]
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!