The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

29 protocols using hr 200

1

Anthropometric Measurements for DEXA Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Body mass was assessed using a TANITA electronic scale (BWB 627-A Class III, TANITA, Arlington Heights, IL, USA). Height was assessed using a wall-mounted stadiometer (HR-200, TANITA, Arlington Heights, IL, USA) with shoes off, feet together, and against the wall. These measures were collected upon arrival and prior to DEXA scans [23 (link)] and were used for both demographic purposes and as information required by the DEXA software (Version 4.5.3, HOLOGIC, Bedford, MA, USA) for accurate analysis of body composition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All body composition and anthropometric measurements were obtained during the initial familiarization session. Body mass was determined using a digital balance (BWB-627A Class III, Tanita Corp, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) and height was assessed using a stadiometer (HR-200, Tanita Corp, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Body composition was determined via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (Hologic Discovery A, Hologic Inc., Bedford, MA). Participants were positioned on the scan table according to manufacturer instructions. All scans were analyzed by the same trained researcher using the manufacturer-provided software package (Hologic APEX Version 4.5.3) and the NHANES correction factor. The test-retest reliability of these DXA procedures in our laboratory has been previously shown to be excellent (ICC ≥ 0.996) using the same device and a similar population.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Body weight and height were measured during each phase of the study. Shoes and excess clothing were removed and then body weight was obtained to the nearest 0.1 kg (Digital Scale BWB-627A Class III, Tanita, Tokyo, Japan). Height was measured to the nearest 0.25 in using a stadiometer (HR-200, Tanita, Tokyo, Japan) and subsequently converted to cm.
Body composition was measured during phases I, III, and V. Participants arrived at the laboratory after following an overnight (8–10 h) fast and having abstained from exercise and caffeine for 24 h. Participants provided a urine sample to determine hydration status. In cases where the urine specific gravity was greater than 1.02, 24 fluid ounces of water were provided to achieve a more standardized hydration status for each testing period. A whole-body DEXA scan (Hologic Discovery A, Hologic, Bedford, MA, USA) was then performed to obtain body composition and bone density parameters using manufacturer provided software (Hologic APEX Software, Version 4.5.3, Hologic, Bedford, MA, USA) with the NHANES correction factor applied. However, it should be noted that only a full body scan was obtained and was used to calculate bone mineral content (BMC), bone mineral density (BMD), and Z-score.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Anthropometric and Body Composition Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
During the screening visit, the height of the participants was measured to the nearest ± 0.5 cm using an analog wall-mounted stadiometer (HR-200, Tanita Corp, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) with their shoes removed and standing erect on flat feet. A bioelectrical impedance analyzer was used at the first visit to determine fat and fat-free masses, and body fat percentage (InBody 570, Cerritos, CA, USA). Body composition analysis occurred between 0600 and 1000 h by trained research personnel according to device specifications, with participants removing jewelry and loose clothing articles and wiping their palms and foot soles with a wipe provided by the manufacturer (InBody tissue, InBody, Cerritos, CA, USA) before standing on the platform with hands and feet in contact with sensors.
At the start of all study visits, participants had their resting heart rate and blood pressure measured using an automated sphygmomanometer (Omron BP785, Omron Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) after being seated with their feet uncrossed on the floor for approximately five minutes. Body mass was measured using a self-calibrating digital scale (Tanita BWB-627A, Tokyo, Japan) and recorded to the nearest ±0.1 kg. Body masses recorded after visit 3 were compared to ensure participants were weight stable through the testing visits [32 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Physical Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants performed a preliminary session during which anthropometry and maximal aerobic capacity were assessed. Height and weight were also measured using a wall‐mounted stadiometer (HR‐200, Tanita, Arlington Heights, IL) and digital scale (BWB‐800, Tanita, Arlington Heights, IL), respectively. Body composition was measured by dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry (GE‐LUNAR Prodigy module, GE Medical Systems, Madison, WI). Aerobic fitness (VO2max) was assessed using an incremental exercise test to exhaustion on an upright cycle ergometer (Kettler ErgoRace, Virginia Beach, VA) in accordance with guidelines from the Canadian Society of Exercise Physiology (CSEP, 1996). Following a self‐paced warmup and at least 10‐minute rest period, the protocol commenced with an external workload of 80 W that increased at a rate of 20 W·min−1 until physical or volitional exhaustion. Expired gases were measured via breath‐by‐breath indirect calorimetry using a metabolic cart (Vmax Encore, Care Fusion, Yorba Linda, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Anthropometric Measurements Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The height (m), body mass (kg), body composition, and waist circumference (cm) of the participants were measured preintervention and postintervention without shoes and with light clothes. Body mass and composition were measured using a hospital-grade body weight scale (TBF 300A, Tanita Corporation of America Inc). Height was measured using a portable wall-mounted height rod (HR-200, Tanita Corporation of America Inc). Waist circumference was measured over participants’ clothing with a measuring tape midway between the 10th rib and the top of the iliac crest. Before the measurements, participants were asked to refrain from the following: (1) drinking alcohol or engaging in moderate to vigorous intensity PA for 12 hours before meeting with the first author, (2) eating or drinking for 3 hours before the meeting, and (3) eating excessively or restrictively within 24 hours of the meeting [44 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Participant Screening Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to all laboratory visits, participants fasted for at least 8 h and abstained from exercise, caffeine, nicotine, and alcohol for at least 24 h. Upon arrival during the initial assessment, participant height was assessed to the nearest ±0.5 cm using an analog wall-mounted stadiometer (HR-200, Tanita Corp, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) with their shoes removed and standing erect on flat feet. Body mass was measured prior to all study visits using a self-calibrating digital balance (Tanita BWB-627A, Tokyo, Japan) and was recorded to the nearest ±0.1 kg. Additionally, body masses recorded after 0 and 2 weeks were compared to ensure the participants were weight stable. Any participant whose body mass deviated by more than 2% during this time was excluded from participation. Heart rate as well as systolic and diastolic blood pressure were assessed using an automatic blood pressure monitor (OMRON BP785, Omron Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). All hemodynamic measurements were completed in a supine position after the study participant had arrived in the laboratory and rested quietly on an exam table for approximately 10 min. Participants were assessed for hydration status by providing a mid-flow urine sample analyzed by a handheld urine refractometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Measuring Children's Anthropometrics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Children’s body weight and height were measured, using standard protocol and equipment, which was calibrated before and during the period of data collection. A portable stadiometer (HR-200, Tanita, Tokyo, Japan) was used to assess body height. Body weight was measured with a body composition analyzer (BC-420 MA, Tanita, Tokyo, Japan). Individual body mass index (BMI) was calculated as body mass (kg) divided by height (m) squared.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Anthropometric Measurements Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants rested quietly for approximately 10 min before measuring resting heart rate and blood pressure (Omron BP785, Omron Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). Body mass was determined (Tanita BWB-627A, Tokyo, Japan) and recorded to the nearest ±0.1 kg. Height was measured using a standard wall-mounted stadiometer (Tanita, HR-200, Tokyo, Japan) and recorded to the nearest ±0.5 centimeter (cm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Anthropometric Measurements and BMI Categorization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants’ body weight and height were measured using a standard protocol and equipment which was calibrated before and during the period of data collection. Body height was measured in an upright position, barefoot, to the nearest 0.1 cm using a portable stadiometer (HR-200, Tanita). Body mass was assessed with an accuracy of 0.01 kg using a body composition analyser (780 MA, Tanita). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (kg/m2). Based on the BMI values, the participants were divided into subgroups: normal weight (BMI: 18.5–24.9), overweight (BMI:25.0–29.9) and obesity (BMI > 30.0)7 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!