The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using amoxicillin

1

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility was determined on Mueller–Hinton agar using the standard disk diffusion method, as described by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) 2017 and also using the Phoenix system. Seventeen antibiotics (bioMérieux, Marcy L’Etoile, France) were tested, namely, amoxicillin (AMX), amoxicillin/clavulanate (AMC), piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ), cephalothin (CEF), ceftriaxone (CRO), cefepime (CPM), ertapenem (ETP), imipenem (IMP), amikacin (AMK), gentamicin (GEN), ciprofloxacin (CIP), Fosfomycin (FOS), nitrofurantoin (NIT), doxycycline (DCI), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT) and colistin (CS). Sensitivity to imipenem, ertapenem, meropenem (MEM) and colistin was confirmed by the antimicrobial gradient method Etest (bioMérieux, Marcy L’Etoile, France) in collected isolates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of strains was performed using the disc diffusion method as previously described [20 (link)] and according to the EUCAST recommendations [38 (link)]. Antibiotics (bioMérieux) tested were as follows: amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ertapenem, imipenem, cefoxitin, tetracycline, tigecycline, chloramphenicol, moxifloxacin, metronidazole, linezolid and vancomycin. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for tetracycline, clindamycin and cefotaxime were determined using the E-test strips as specified by the manufacturer (bioMérieux). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed twice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling of Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibility profile of the isolates was identified using the standard disk diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton agar (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). Sixteen different antibiotics were tested, including amoxicillin (20 μg), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (20/10 μg), piperacillin-tazobactam (30/6 μg), cephalotin (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), ertapenem (10 μg), imipenem (10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), Fosfomycin (200 μg), nitrofurantoin (100 μg), tobramycin (10 μg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), and colistin (10 μg) (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of colistin, ertapenem, and imipenem was identified using the microdilution and the E-test methods, respectively. Each strain was considered to be resistant to colistin, ertapenem, and imipenem if their MICs were greater than 2 mg/L, 1 mg/L, and 8 mg/L, respectively. The results were interpreted according to the European Microbial Medical Sensitivity Committee (EUCAST) 2017 (http://www.Sfmicrobiology.Org/Userfiles/Files/Files/CASFM/CASF%20V2_0_MAI2017.PDF, accessed on 25 September 2020).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotics susceptibility pattern of the isolates was determined using the disk diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar (Oxoid, England). Inhibition zone diameter values were interpreted as recommended by the Antibiogram Committee of the French Society of Microbiology [11 ]. The 13 antibiotics (BioMérieux, France) used in this study are amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (20/10 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), amoxicillin (30 μg), imipenem (10 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), tobramycin (10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), kanamycin (30 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), ofloxacin (5 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling of P. putida

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Kirby–Bauer technique was used (Bauer et al., 1966 (link)). Briefly, LB agar plates were spread with a suspension of approximately 108 CFU/ml of wild-type P. putida DOT-T1E or DOT-T1E-18 mutant strain to produce a lawn. Once the plate surface was dried, antibiotic disks of ofloxacin (5 μg), pefloxacin (5 μg), amoxicillin (25 μg), ticarcillin (75 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), erythromycin (15 μg) and tetracycline (30 μg) (BioMerieux, Spain) were placed on the surface of plates. After 18–20 h at 30°C, the inhibition zone was measured around each disc.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Marseille-P3237

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibility of strain Marseille-P3237 was assessed using the E-test method for the following molecules: benzylpenicillin, amoxicillin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, imipenem, amikacin, erythromycin, daptomycin, rifampicin, minocycline, teicoplanin, vancomycin, colistin and metronidazole (bioMérieux).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibiotic Resistance Profile Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic resistance profile of the strain was evaluated using the E‐test method and the following molecules: benzylpenecilin, amoxicillin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, imipenem, rifampicin, minocycline, tigecycline, amikacin, teicoplanin, vancomycin, colistin, daptomycin, and metronidazole (Biomerieux, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Microbial Identification and MRSA Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microbial identification was confirmed by Bruker Biotyper MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker, Billerica, MA). For MRSA designation, a PBP2a SA culture colony test (Alere) was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions using 18- to 24-h subculture growth. The presence of mecA and the homolog mecC were determined by in-house PCRs (22 (link), 23 (link)). Susceptibility testing included that for cefoxitin by disk diffusion and for oxacillin by disk diffusion and gradient diffusion. Methods followed the procedural guidelines outlined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (documents M02 and M23) (55 , 56 ). Disk diffusion testing of cefoxitin (Hardy Diagnostics) and oxacillin (BD) was performed on conventional Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) (Hardy Diagnostics). Gradient diffusion testing of oxacillin (bioMérieux) was performed on MHA with 2% NaCl agar (Remel). Detection of beta-lactamase production was assessed by the disk diffusion penicillin zone edge test (Hardy Diagnostics) and nitrocefin-based Cefinase disk test (Hardy Diagnostics). Beta-lactamase inhibitor rescue phenotype was determined by assessing the fold change in MIC from amoxicillin (bioMérieux) and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (bioMérieux) gradient diffusion testing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of BAL Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The BAL fluid from each subject was divided into 2 samples. The first sample was sent to the routine diagnostic laboratory. Antibiotic susceptibilities results were classified as susceptible, intermediate, and resistant by the Phoenix automated microbiology system (BD Diagnostics, le Pont de Claix, France) according to The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing recommendations. The second BAL sample (10 mL) was sent to our laboratory, where it was subjected to centrifugation (4,000g for 4 min). Once the supernatant was carefully removed, a 1.5-mL aliquot was used to inoculate 2 Mu ¨ller-Hinton and 1 blood agar plates. A set of 9 different E-test strips, including amoxicillin, amoxicillin plus clavulanate, cefotaxime, cefepime, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ertapenem, doripenem, and colimycin (BioMe ´rieux, Marcy-L'e ´toile, France), was directly applied to the Mu ¨ller-Hinton agar plates. Vancomycin and cefoxitin E-test strips were applied onto the blood agar plate (Fig. 1). The Mu ¨ller-Hinton agar plates were incubated at 37°C, whereas the blood agar plates were in a 5% CO 2 incubator at 37°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!