The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ventana pd l1 sp263 assay

Manufactured by Roche
Sourced in United States

The VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay is a qualitative immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay used to detect programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and urothelial carcinoma tissue specimens. The assay utilizes the SP263 rabbit monoclonal primary antibody to assess PD-L1 protein expression.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

23 protocols using ventana pd l1 sp263 assay

1

PD-L1 Status Evaluation in Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients’ PD-L1 status was evaluated using the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Tuscon, Arizona, USA) in tumour samples collected at screening. Archival tissue samples were used if available, otherwise, a fresh biopsy was recommended. PD-L1-positive status was defined as ≥1% of tumour cells (TCs) with PD-L1 expression, except in the Phase 2 (combination dose expansion) UC cohort. In the Phase 2 UC cohort, patients were considered to be PD-L1-positive if immune cells (ICs) involved >1% of the tumour area and ≥25% of TCs or ICs had PD-L1 expression, or if ICs involved ≤1% of the tumour area and ≥25% of TCs or 100% of ICs expressed PD-L1, consistent with the approach used in a previously reported Phase 2 trial of tislelizumab monotherapy in locally advanced/metastatic UC [30 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each slide set of all cases was stained using the PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay purchased from Dako and the Ventana PD-L1 (SP263) assay purchased from Ventana (Tucson, AZ, USA) in accordance with their respective protocols detailed in the product inserts and autostainer manuals (Dako Autostainer Link48 for 22C3 and Ventana BenchMark Ultra for SP263). Immunohistochemical staining for MMR-related proteins, including MLH1 (clone ES05, Dako, Agilent), MSH2 (clone FE11, Dako, Agilent), MSH6 (clone EP49, Dako, Agilent) and PMS2 (clone EP51, Dako, Agilent), was performed on the Dako Autostainer Link48. In addition, Ki-67 was stained with a monoclonal antibody against Ki-67 (Ki67) (ZSGB-BIO, Beijing, China) using the Dako Autostainer Link48.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

PD-L1 Expression and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PD-L1 expression status in tumor tissue samples was determined using the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay (Ventana Medical Systems), with high PD-L1 expression defined as ≥25% of TCs with membrane staining and low PD-L1 expression defined as <25% of TCs with membrane staining. Absolute neutrophil count and absolute lymphocyte count were assessed according to local standard to derive NLRs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Assessing PD-L1 and CD8+ Expression in Tumor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PD-L1 expression on tumor cells and immune cells was assessed at a central laboratory using the Ventana PD-L1 (SP263) assay (Ventana Medical Systems; 740–4907). The threshold of ≥1% of tumor-infiltrating immune cells staining positive within the tumor area of the tested tissue sample defined the official PD-L1 status of a given sample, but tumor cell expression was also evaluated as an exploratory variable. CD8 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry using clone C8/144B (M710301–2) and scored via a quantitative method using image analysis software (Definiens).20 (link) A central tumor region was delineated by a pathologist. At the interface between malignant and adjacent normal tissue, a 1000-μm wide immune margin (IM), an immunologically active region and site of PD-L1 expression,21 (link) centered around the perimeter was generated. For both the central tumor region and the IM, the relative area of marker-positive cells (ie, the CD8+ area relative to the total tumor area) was calculated. CD8 expression was reported in terms of the percentage of CD8+ cells in relation to the total number of CD8+ cells in the total tumor area, tumor center, or IM, with the median as the cut-point value.20 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Pembrolizumab Efficacy in PD-L1-Positive Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The two independent primary endpoints were PFS as per RECIST version 1.1 according to blinded independent central review (BICR) and OS in patients with PD-L1-positive tumors (≥1% of immune cells staining positive within the tumor area of the tissue sample). PD-L1 expression was assessed at a central laboratory with the Ventana PD-L1 (SP263) assay (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ). Key secondary endpoints were PFS as determined by BICR according to RECIST version 1.1 and OS in patients in the overall population, irrespective of PD-L1 expression. Other secondary endpoints were ORR, best overall response, and adverse events (AEs). Tumors were assessed using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging as previously described.17 (link) AEs were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs, version 4.03.17 (link) We conducted subgroup analyses of these endpoints in patients <65, ≥65 to <75, and ≥75 years of age.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Durvalumab for Advanced Esophageal Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Durvalumab 20 mg/kg i.v. or placebo was administered every 4 weeks for a maximum of 12 months or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Assessments of tumor response were performed using chest computed tomography every 12 weeks for the first 24 months after enrollment, every 4 months from 25 to 48 months, every 6 months from 49 to 60 months, and every 12 months thereafter. Positron emission tomography or esophagography was used to confirm the suspected disease.
For PD-L1 assessments, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were cut into 4-μm thick sections, stained with a VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) assay (Ventana Medical Systems, AZ, USA), and observed with the OptiView DAB immunohistochemistry Detection Kit (Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Assessment of PD-L1 expression was conducted based on tumor proportion score, defined as the percentage of viable tumor cells with partial or complete membrane staining in at least 100 viable tumor cells, which is performed independently and prospectively by two pathologists who were blind to any information about patients. Positive PD-L1 expression was defined as ≥1% of the tumor cells presenting with any membrane staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Standardizing PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Using the respective institutional research ethics board approval, 18 pathologists contributed eight unstained serial sections prepared from paraffin blocks of 81 lung cancer cases that they had collected through their routine clinical practice. The final cases included 39 adenocarcinomas, 26 squamous cell carcinomas, six poorly differentiated non–small cell carcinomas, and 10 small cell carcinomas (Supplementary Table 1). The cases included 21 resections, 20 core needle or bronchial biopsy samples, 18 tumor-positive lymph node excision biopsy or resection samples, and 22 cytological cell blocks.
The PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx and PD-L1 28–8 pharmDx assays were purchased from Dako (Heverlee, Belgium). The Ventana PD-L1 (SP142) assay and Ventana PD-L1 (SP263) assay were purchased from Ventana (Tucson, AZ). The 73–10 antibody was provided by EMD Serono/Merck KGaA/Pfizer through Dako/Agilent together with its staining protocol (see below).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluation of PD-L1 Expression in NSCLC, HNSCC, and UC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ninety (90) commercial clinical cases, thirty (30) for each of NSCLC (BioIVT, West Sussex, UK, ProteoGenex, Inc., Inglewood, CA, USA and Tissue Solutions, Glasgow, UK) HNSCC and UC (Avaden Biosciences, Seattle, WA, USA), previously assessed using the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay (Ventana, Tucson, AZ) were chosen to represent a wide range of percentage tumour cell membrane staining (TCIHC). This tissue set has previously been assessed using other PD-L1 IHC assays such as Dako PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx and PD-L1 IHC 28–8 pharmDx assays [12 (link), 25 ]. Tissue cases included in the analysis represent samples that may be encountered in a routine clinical setting. Tissue was formalin fixed according to industry guidelines [26 (link)].
Tissue sections were cut at 4μm thickness. IHC and RNAScope assays were performed on tissue cut within 10 consecutive sections of each other, this minimises the impact of heterogeneity within a tissue block [27 (link)]. Tissue sections were assessed by IHC within 3 months of preparation. RNAScope staining was performed within 12 months of tissue sectioning [28 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

PD-L1 Expression Assessment in FFPET

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PD-L1 expression in FFPET samples was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) performed using the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA) per the manufacturer’s guidelines.25 (link),26 High expression of PD-L1 was defined as ≥25% of the tumor cells with membrane positivity for PD-L1 at any intensity. Low expression of PD-L1 was defined as <25% of the tumor cells with membrane positivity for PD-L1 at any intensity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

PD-L1 Scoring Precision and Concordance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Institutional review board approval was obtained by the Roche Tissue Diagnostics Clinical Operation Department. The two reader precision studies used commercial samples. For the samples used in the comparison study, which were collected as part of a BeiGene study, consent was obtained in compliance with requirements. Each pathologist received training on the TAP scoring algorithm: TAP=%PD-L1 positive TC and ICTumor area
Pathologists were then required to pass a series of tests before participation in the studies (see Pathologist training section). Samples from gastric adenocarcinoma, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) (including both resections and biopsies) were stained using the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) assay (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA). Between- and within-reader precision studies were performed for the TAP score among three internal (Roche Tissue Diagnostics) pathologists (internal study) and six pathologists from three external organizations (external study). After successful completion of the reader precision studies, TAP score was compared to CPS retrospectively for concordance and time efficacy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!