The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss 20.0 statistic

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS 20.0 is a comprehensive statistical software package developed by IBM. It provides a wide range of data analysis and management tools, enabling users to perform advanced statistical analysis, data mining, and predictive modeling. The software supports various data types and offers a user-friendly interface for handling complex data sets.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

32 protocols using spss 20.0 statistic

1

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SPSS 20.0 statistics software was utilized to analyze the resulted data. The measurement data were expressed in the form of x ± s (mean number ± standard deviation), which were submitted to the homogeneity test of variance. P > 0.05 indicated the homogeneity of variance, and the pair comparisons between each mean number were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. P < 0.05 suggested inhomogeneity of variance, and the one-way ANOVA should be corrected by Welch. The pair comparisons of multivariate analysis were performed by the Least Significant Difference (LSD) method. The differences were proved to be significant in terms of statistics if P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Whitefly Performance and Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical significance of whitefly performance was determined using one-way ANOVA at a 0.05 level, followed by Fisher’s least-significant difference (LSD) tests. Percentage data of female survival were transformed by arcsine square root for statistical analysis, but the original data are presented for convenience of reading. qPCR data were analyzed using student’s t test at a significance level of p < 0.05. All analyses were performed using the software SPSS20.0 Statistics.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

NEDD8 Expression and Prognosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were analyzed by SPSS 20.0 statistics software. Quantitative data were evaluated by mean ± SD. According to whether the variance was homogeneity, parameter test and non‐parametric test were used, respectively. Associations between the expression of NEDD8 and clinical characters were analyzed by chi‐squared tests. Kaplan‐Meier method and log‐rank tests were carried out to estimate the prognostic value of NEDD8 in patient survival. < .05 for the difference was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Biochemical Determinations of Accessions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All biochemical determinations were repeated three times, and they were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Duncan’s multiple-comparison test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed by using SPSS 20.0 Statistics (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) to identify significant differences (p < 0.05) among accessions. Principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis (CA) were performed by using OriginPro 2021b Statistics (OriginLab Inc., Northampton, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Prognostic Value of AXL Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were analyzed by SPSS.20.0 statistics software. Quantitative date was evaluated by mean ± SD. According to whether the variance was homogeneity, parameter test and non-parametric test were used respectively. Relationship between the expression of AXL and the clinicopathological features was evaluated using χ2 tests. The prognostic value of AXL was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and Cox-regression analysis. For the results, P<0.05 for the difference was considered as significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS 20.0 statistics software was used for the analysis of all data. Data were obtained from at least three separate experiments and are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). One-way analysis of variance for multiple groups or Student’s t test for two groups was used for data analysis with comparisons. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Bone Density and Mechanical Strength Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS 20.0 statistics software was used for statistical analysis. The Shapiro-Wilk test was first used to determine whether the quantitative data followed a normal distribution. The Lane-Sandhu X-ray scores, the maximum load in the three-point bending test, the maximum torque, the newly synthesized trabecular bone density, and the collagen levels were all found to be normally distributed data with homogeneity of variance. These results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Multiple groups comparisons were carried out using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or two-way repeated-measures ANOVAs over time as appropriate. If the difference was statistically significant, then the least significant difference (LSD) test method was used for comparison between two groups. A difference of P < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The values were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-test and one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 statistics software (SPSS, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). A P-value of less than 0.05 was defined as statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were presented as mean ± standard error of mean (S.E.M.) with sample size, n, indicating the number of cells from which each dataset was collected. Error bars represent S.E.M. The statistical significances were assessed using one–way ANOVA (Figs 1, 2, and Supplementary Data Figs S1 and S3), Kruskal–Wallis test (Fig. 3), and two–way ANOVA (Fig. 4, and Supplementary data Fig. S6), the Mann–Whitney U test for two independent samples (Fig. 5), with a statistically significant level of p < 0.05. Data analyses were performed using the SPSS 20.0 Statistics (New York; United states).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Thermal Tolerance of Whitefly Species

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All percentage data were arcsine square root transformed for use in statistical analysis and back-transformed for presentation in tables and figures. Comparisons of survival of eggs, pupae and adults between the two whitefly species following exposures to each of the low and high temperatures were performed by an independent-samples Student-t Test. The number of eggs laid, percentages of the egg hatch, developmental time of offspring and sex ratio of offspring of the populations of the two whitefly species following exposure of adults to low or high temperatures were analyzed by a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test. Likewise, the levels of expression of each of the heat shock protein related genes were analyzed by a two-way ANOVA followed by LSD test. Each of the two factors had two levels in every case: for whitefly species, MEAM1 and MED; and for temperature, a high temperature and a control temperature. The differences between treatments were considered significant when P < 0.05. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 20.0 Statistics and Excel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!