The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using med pc 5 software

1

Operant Conditioning for Goal-Directed and Habitual Behavior

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The balance between goal-directed and habitual behaviors was investigated by using two identical operant chambers (Med-Associates, St. Albans, VT), enclosed in sound attenuating boxes that were differentiated by contextual cues (15 mm wide multi-colored washi tape that was vertically and horizontally aligned on chamber walls to give a checkerboard-like pattern or clear plexiglass chamber walls). Each chamber was equipped with a pellet dispenser that delivered 20 mg food pellets (Bio-Serv, Flemington, NJ) into a recessed food magazine, two retractable levers on either side of the food magazine, a house light, a stainless-steel grid floor and an 8 input/16 output connection panel that serves as an interface between the chambers, and a computer that runs the MED-PC V software (Med-Associates, St. Albans, VT) to operate the experimental paradigms and record lever pressing behavior. Prior to training, mice were handled, and food restricted to 85%–90% of their baseline body weight. Their body weights were maintained within this range during the entirety of the instrumental learning paradigm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Automated Rat Operant Chamber Testing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Behavioral testing was performed in 10 automated, rat operant chambers (Med Associates Inc., St. Albans, VT, USA) housed in sound attenuating wooden boxes equipped with a fan for ventilation. The test chambers measured 17.5 cm tall with a 24 cm × 20 cm stainless steel grid floor resting above a tray filled with corn cob bedding. Dustless grain-based precision pellets (45 mg; Bio-Serv, Flemington, NJ, USA) were dispensed into a food magazine centered 2.5 cm above the floor. A retractable response lever with a cue light above was located on both sides of the food magazine and a house light was located on the opposite wall. White noise was presented during testing to minimize disruption from outside sounds. Med-PC V software (Med Associates) was used to conduct the testing programs and record data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Methamphetamine Self-Administration in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rats learnt to self-administer METH in standard sound-attenuated operant chambers (Med Associates, VT, USA). Each chamber had two retractable levers, a cue light above each lever, a house light and a tone generator. Each lever was programmed as either active or inactive and their position was counterbalanced across chambers. Four infrared photobeam detectors were also positioned on the sidewall of each operant chamber to measure locomotor activity. Active and inactive lever presses, number of infusions and locomotor activity were recorded using MED-PC-V software (Med Associates). Locomotor activity was recorded during all addiction-relevant stages, except for persistence in drug-seeking when the drug was signalled not available.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Operant Conditioning for Intracranial Self-Stimulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were trained on a fixed-ratio 1 (FR1) schedule to respond for stimulation via a wheel manipulandum (ENV-113AM; Med Associates, St. Albans, VT, USA) within an operant chamber (15.24 × 13.34 × 12.7 cm; ENV-307A-CT; Med Associates) as previously described (Fish et al. 2012 (link); Carlezon and Chartoff 2007 (link)). Operant chambers were placed inside closed sound-attenuating cubicles (ENV-022V; Med Associates). For every ¼ turn of the response wheel, a 500-ms train of square-wave, cathodal current (100-ms pulses) was delivered at a constant frequency of 142 Hz through a stimulator (PHM-150B/2; Med Associates). Each stimulation was followed by a 500-ms time-out period during which responses were counted but not reinforced by stimulation. The current intensity was adjusted for each subject to the lowest value that produced > 500 responses during a 45-min period across at least three consecutive training sessions (−50 to −140 μA). The minimum effective current for each subject was held constant throughout the rest of the study. All behavioral procedures were performed using Med-PC V software (Med Associates).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Operant Fentanyl Self-Administration in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The operant conditioning equipment used in this study has been described in detail previously26 . Briefly, intravenous fentanyl self-administration data were collected using 32 modular mouse operant conditioning chambers enclosed in sound attenuating cubicles (Med Associates; St. Albans, Vermont). Two retractable response levers were mounted to the right and left sides of the front wall (henceforth active lever and inactive lever, respectively). A stimulus light was mounted directly above each of the two levers. A house light was centrally mounted on the front wall of each chamber. A 25-gauge single-channel plastic swivel was mounted to a counterbalanced lever-arm attached to the lid of the chamber. An infusion pump was mounted within the sound attenuating cubicle outside of the operant conditioning chamber. Tubing was used to connect a 20 mL syringe mounted on the infusion pump to the swivel. During fentanyl self-administration testing, tubing was used to connect the externalized catheter port on the midscapular region of the mouse to the plastic swivel. Operant conditioning chambers were controlled by two Med Associates control units using MED-PC V software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Operant Conditioning Chambers for Behavioral Experiments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Training and testing were conducted in 12 operant chambers (Med Associates, St. Albans, VT, USA) as described previously (Figure 1B; Ciampoli et al., 2017 (link); Huang et al., 2017 (link)). Briefly, two strings of LED lights were installed onto the ceiling of each of the sound-attenuating boxes and controlled by a timer to ensure 12 h light/dark. Each operant chamber contained a five nose-poke hole wall outfitted with an LED stimulus light for each hole. Additional LED pre-cue lights were installed above each of the five nose-poke holes. An infrared beam detected nose-poke. On the opposite wall of the five holes, there was a food magazine and a head entry detector for food reinforcement. A water dispenser on the latter wall allowed the mice to have full access to water throughout the test. A houselight was located above the food magazine. The operant chambers were connected to a smart control panel and interfaced to a Windows computer equipped with an MED-PC V software (Med Associates).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Operant conditioning for intracranial self-stimulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were trained on a fixed-ratio 1 (FR1) schedule to respond for stimulation via a wheel manipulandum (ENV-113AM; Med Associates, St. Albans VT USA) within an operant chamber (15.24 x 13.34 x 12.7 cm; ENV-307A-CT; Med Associates) as previously described (Fish et al. 2012, Carlezon and Chartoff 2007) . Operant chambers were placed inside closed sound-attenuating cubicles (ENV-022V; Med Associates). For every ¼ turn of the response wheel, a 500 ms train of square-wave, cathodal current (100-ms pulses) was delivered at a constant frequency of 142 Hz through a stimulator (PHM-150B/2; Med Associates). Each stimulation was followed by a 500 ms time-out period during which responses were counted but not reinforced by stimulation. The current intensity was adjusted for each subject to the lowest value that produced > 500 responses during a 45-min period across at least 3 consecutive training sessions (-50 to -140 uA). The minimum effective current for each subject was held constant throughout the rest of the study. All behavioral procedures were performed using Med-PC V software (Med Associates).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Operant Conditioning Cage Setup for Rodent Behavior

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Experiments were conducted in a modular operant conditioning cage with a grid floor, pellet receptacle, and pellet dispenser (Behavioral Test Packages for Rat, Med Associates Inc., Fairfax, VT, USA) controlled by Med-PC® V software (version 5.08, Med Associates Inc.). Additionally, there was a USV condenser microphone CM16/CMPA (UltraSoundGate, Avisoft Bioacoustics, Glienicke/Nordbahn, Germany) placed in the glass ceiling of the cage and an ultrasonic speaker (Vifa, Avisoft Bioacoustics) placed in the corner of the cage, next to the pellet receptacle, connected to an UltraSoundGate Player 116 (Avisoft Bioacoustics). Both USV-playback and recording were performed using Avisoft Recorder USGH software (version 1.0.0.1, Avisoft Bioacoustics). The locomotor activity was recorded with a FLIR® camera (Teledyne FLIR LCC, Wilsonville, OR, USA) mounted behind or above the cage and controlled via Spinnaker® SDK software (version 1.15.0.63, Teledyne FLIR LCC, Wilsonville, OR, USA); home-cage activity was recorded with a Basler camera (acA1300-60gc, Basler AG, Ahrensburg, Germany) controlled via EthoVision XT software (version 10, Noldus, Wageningen, Netherlands). Non-flavored sucrose pellets weighing 45 mg (TestDiet®, St. Louis, MO, USA) were used as rewards in conditioning. The cage was cleaned and thoroughly wiped using 10% EtOH between animals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Voluntary Exercise after VML Injury

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals in the rehabilitation groups (VEH-RUN and LOS-RUN) were housed with unrestricted access to a running wheel (ENV-042; Med Associates Inc.; Fairfax, VT, USA) and were acclimated 7 days prior to VML injury. The running wheel access was restricted for 7 days post-VML injury followed by unrestricted access until the 56-day study endpoint. Total running distances were digitally recorded using Med PC-V software (Med Associates Inc.; Fairfax, VT, USA), and the average daily running distance per animal was calculated weekly after each data collection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fiber Photometry System for Neural Activity Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fiber photometry system used two light-emitting diodes (490 nm and 405 nm; Thorlabs) controlled by an LED driver (Thorlabs). The 490 nm light source was filtered with a 470 nm (the excitation peak of dLight1.1) bandpass filter and the 405nm light source was used as an isosbestic control.48 (link) Light was passed through an optical fiber (400 μm, .48 NA; Doric) that was coupled to a chronically implanted fiber optic cannula in each mouse. LEDs were controlled via a real-time signal processor (RZ5P; Tucker-Davis Technologies) and emission signals from each LED were determined by multiplexing. Synapse software (Tucker-Davis Technologies) was used to control the timing and intensity of the LEDs and to record the emitted fluorescent signals upon detection by a photoreceiver (Newport Visible Femtowatt Photoreceiver Module; Doric). LED power (125 μW) was measured daily and maintained across trials and experiments. For each event of interest (e.g., cue presentation, footshock), transistor-transistor logic (TTL) signals were used to timestamp onset times from Med-PC V software (Med Associates Inc.) and were detected via the RZ5P in the Synapse software (see below). A built-in low-pass filter on the Synapse software was set to 10 Hz to eliminate noise in the fiber photometry raw data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!