The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sc 5958

Manufactured by Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Sourced in United States

Sc-5958 is a product from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. It is a piece of lab equipment. Its core function is to perform a specific task in a laboratory setting.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 protocols using sc 5958

1

Immunohistochemical Detection of TFE3 in ASPS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used the P-16 polyclonal antibody to TFE3 (Santa Cruz# sc-5958; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) which binds to the C-terminal portion of the TFE3 protein downstream of the region encoded by exon 6 to help confirm the diagnosis of ASPS (6 (link)). Representative 5-μm FFPE sections from each case were mounted onto positively charged slides, and subsequently processed for immunohistochemical staining using a standard protocol. Briefly, the sections were deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated using graded ethanol concentrations, and then subjected to antigen retrieval by boiling in citrate buffer at pH 6.0 for 10 minutes. Following quenching with peroxidase and blocking with avidin, sections were incubated overnight with a 1:500 dilution of the polyclonal antibody to TFE3 in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Detection of antibody binding was achieved using a biotinylated secondary antibody and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) and 3,3,5,5′-diaminobenzidine as chromogen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Detection of TFE3 in Xp11.2 RCC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC staining for the detection of TFE3 was performed using a goat polyclonal antibody for TFE3 (sc-5958, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and the Envision detection kit (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) in 76 suspected Xp11.2 RCC. The detailed procedures of immunostaining was carried out as mentioned in previous study29 (link).
All slides were examined and scored by two pathologists, who were blinded to all clinical data, in an open discussion. The interpretation of immunoreactivity for TFE3 was evaluated as previously reported20 (link)30 (link). Tumors scored as positive for TFE3 demonstrated nuclear immunoreactivity that was readily apparent at low-power magnification (×4 objective). These cases were subdivided into moderately (2+) and strongly (3+) positive on the basis of the intensity of labeling. Weak/equivocal nuclear immunoreactivity (1+) for TFE3, demonstrating nuclear immunoreactivity was subtle at low magnification and typically required higher magnification to be appreciated, was considered as negative. Cytoplasmic immunoreactivity was ignored because native TFE3 and its fusion proteins are known to localize to the nucleus31 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of TFE3 in RCC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry of TFE3 were performed on the four-μm-thick formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections of all the RCC cases. IHC staining of the sections was carried out using anti-TFE3 antibody (SC-5958,1:300; Santa Cruz, CA). Further, IHC assay of the TFE3 was conducted though labeled streptavidin-biotin method followed by overnight incubation (22 (link)). The Xp11.2 translocation RCC and IgG were used as positive and negative controls for the IHC assay, respectively. Only nuclear TFE3 staining was considered as the positive result. The final result was analyzed by two independent observers and the inconsistent result was resolved by an experienced pathologist. To perform a semi-quantitative assessment, the results of this study were analyzed in reference to the previously reported intensity and degree of nuclear staining (22 (link), 23 (link)). The IHC score was calculated by multiplying the percentage of positive cells (0–100) by the staining intensity (0=no staining, 1 = weak staining, 2 = moderate staining, and 3 = strong staining). For the result of immunostaining, a score of between 0 and 25 was considered negative (–), a score of between 26 and 100 was considered weak (+), a score of between 101 and 200 was considered moderate (++), and a score of between 201 and 300 was considered strong (+++).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!